6.1 sec in total
561 ms
5 sec
557 ms
Click here to check amazing 24 content for Kyrgyzstan. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about 24.kg
Свежие Новости Кыргызстана и Бишкека на нашем сайте 24.KG. Ошские события, Выборы, Политика, Парламент, Экономика, Общество, Люди и судьбы, Бишкек-24, Великая Победа, Репортажи, Криминал, Происшествия...
Visit 24.kgWe analyzed 24.kg page load time and found that the first response time was 561 ms and then it took 5.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
24.kg performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.9 s
10/100
10%
Value9.6 s
0/100
25%
Value12.7 s
3/100
10%
Value1,640 ms
12/100
30%
Value0.639
9/100
15%
Value20.9 s
2/100
10%
561 ms
998 ms
60 ms
43 ms
366 ms
Our browser made a total of 96 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 47% of them (45 requests) were addressed to the original 24.kg, 32% (31 requests) were made to Ox.24.kg and 4% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.7 sec) belongs to the original domain 24.kg.
Page size can be reduced by 336.5 kB (13%)
2.5 MB
2.2 MB
In fact, the total size of 24.kg main page is 2.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 73.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 73.3 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 129.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. 24 images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 118.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 118.8 kB or 27% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 14.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. 24.kg needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 14.6 kB or 22% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 21 (24%)
87
66
The browser has sent 87 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of 24. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
24.kg
561 ms
24.kg
998 ms
js
60 ms
css
43 ms
368fcb76aa6d9a493e9d85942ee97cf2.css
366 ms
context.js
1172 ms
adsbygoogle.js
122 ms
adsbygoogle.js
209 ms
cf237608c3250a952ef56665ce15299e.js
850 ms
jquery.autocomplete.js
529 ms
spcjs.php
993 ms
render.js
571 ms
cycounter
690 ms
3_0_FFFFFFFF_FFFFFFFF_0_pageviews
699 ms
logo.png
399 ms
logo-md.png
316 ms
logo-sm.png
360 ms
329502_w848_h445.jpg
823 ms
329522_w848_h445.jpg
854 ms
329475_w848_h445.png
540 ms
329513_w848_h445.jpg
725 ms
329498_w848_h445.jpg
1143 ms
329410_w848_h445.jpg
793 ms
329253_w848_h445.jpg
721 ms
329302_w263_h198.jpg
903 ms
257798_w263_h198.jpg
905 ms
329486_w555_h315.png
1297 ms
249737_w263_h198.jpg
999 ms
311467_w263_h198.jpg
1021 ms
156949_w263_h198.jpg
1083 ms
329514_w555_h315.jpg
1265 ms
328290_w263_h198.jpg
1172 ms
328769_w263_h198.jpg
1193 ms
329364_w263_h198.jpg
1264 ms
257559_w263_h198.jpg
1378 ms
69704_w555_h315.jpg
1379 ms
328291_w263_h198.jpg
1380 ms
329474_w263_h198.png
1444 ms
329155_w263_h198.jpg
1445 ms
329519_w263_h198.jpg
1463 ms
329129_w263_h198.jpg
1512 ms
329530_w263_h198.jpg
1516 ms
328535_w263_h198.jpg
1528 ms
329232_w263_h198.jpg
1624 ms
328827_w263_h198.jpg
1625 ms
329409_w263_h198.jpg
1631 ms
show_ads_impl.js
236 ms
context.js
876 ms
329004_w263_h198.jpg
1603 ms
jizaRExUiTo99u79D0KEwA.ttf
29 ms
jizfRExUiTo99u79B_mh0O6tKA.ttf
41 ms
img.php
1305 ms
BngSUXNadjH0qYEzV7ab-oWlsbg95AiFW_g.ttf
19 ms
BngRUXNadjH0qYEzV7ab-oWlsbCGwRg.ttf
18 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
1726 ms
328774_w263_h198.jpg
1520 ms
zrt_lookup.html
33 ms
ads
29 ms
329358_w263_h198.jpg
1461 ms
328334_w263_h198.jpg
1448 ms
329168_w263_h198.png
1405 ms
328901_w263_h198.JPG
1399 ms
spc_iframe.php
215 ms
fl.js
381 ms
analytics.js
57 ms
watch.js
1 ms
afr.php
174 ms
afr.php
288 ms
afr.php
343 ms
afr.php
463 ms
afr.php
516 ms
afr.php
511 ms
afr.php
517 ms
afr.php
514 ms
afr.php
510 ms
collect
14 ms
collect
24 ms
sprite.js
467 ms
27eeb67aa0944b00bf2c7f989ddc3d7d.png
1181 ms
lg.php
522 ms
eb944dd61a3c682ef5786049d8d0f6b7.jpg
582 ms
lg.php
415 ms
2a9004634844ef6d1a858bdfd12f377d.png
698 ms
lg.php
470 ms
1a81ff465910f344d946a9523992ca6a.jpg
906 ms
lg.php
413 ms
41cf458b31010b0e8b76ed02220b64e2.jpg
641 ms
lg.php
528 ms
b2d2cc42d8e2b67a6413bf5b0b6f24bd.png
703 ms
lg.php
699 ms
15b3ded5ea3cb1494bea0188bbc7987e.png
862 ms
lg.php
810 ms
3442810bed67df515c0dd4bfe5866d46.png
863 ms
lg.php
872 ms
f2f4960e2c5027134d6dd854b4787168.jpg
1149 ms
lg.php
994 ms
24.kg accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
24.kg best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
24.kg SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
RU
RU
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise 24.kg can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that 24.kg main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
24.kg
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of 24. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: