Tools & Wizards About Us
24etar.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 22

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    40% of other websites

  • 80

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 49% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

24etar.net

الصفحة الرئيسية - ٢٤ اطار

Page Load Speed

1.2 sec in total

First Response

41 ms

Resources Loaded

1.1 sec

Page Rendered

56 ms

24etar.net screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing 24 Etar content for Egypt. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about 24etar.net

Visit 24etar.net

Key Findings

We analyzed 24etar.net page load time and found that the first response time was 41 ms and then it took 1.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

24etar.net performance score

22

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.3 s

73/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value34.6 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value19.7 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value6,930 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.026

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value27.4 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

24etar.net

41 ms

24etar.net

655 ms

style.css

43 ms

1215977fa750b669.css

36 ms

818b9983dca99a0a.css

33 ms

Our browser made a total of 19 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 89% of them (17 requests) were addressed to the original 24etar.net, 5% (1 request) were made to Cdn.msaaq.com and 5% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (655 ms) belongs to the original domain 24etar.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 3.8 kB (51%)

Content Size

7.5 kB

After Optimization

3.7 kB

  • HTML
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of 24etar.net main page is 7.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 7.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-52%

Potential reduce by 3.8 kB

  • Original 7.3 kB
  • After minification 7.3 kB
  • After compression 3.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 3.8 kB or 52% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 14 B

  • Original 227 B
  • After minification 227 B
  • After compression 213 B

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. 24etar.net has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 13 (76%)

Requests Now

17

After Optimization

4

  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 17 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of 24 Etar. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

24etar.net

24etar.net

41 ms

24etar.net

24etar.net

655 ms

style.css

style.css

43 ms

1215977fa750b669.css

1215977fa750b669.css

36 ms

818b9983dca99a0a.css

818b9983dca99a0a.css

33 ms

polyfills-c67a75d1b6f99dc8.js

polyfills-c67a75d1b6f99dc8.js

411 ms

webpack-45728df1637fc71d.js

webpack-45728df1637fc71d.js

29 ms

framework-ce84985cd166733a.js

framework-ce84985cd166733a.js

33 ms

main-88e709951377b27d.js

main-88e709951377b27d.js

28 ms

_app-cc56b40ae6e51615.js

_app-cc56b40ae6e51615.js

136 ms

bb1e58e9-7c8d73ff8eb2afed.js

bb1e58e9-7c8d73ff8eb2afed.js

73 ms

6331-f4a2c5943a2827ab.js

6331-f4a2c5943a2827ab.js

84 ms

4472-7a74d44caf1f4d4b.js

4472-7a74d44caf1f4d4b.js

72 ms

9923-7f37006722105c20.js

9923-7f37006722105c20.js

84 ms

8251-ab00b15f740ee509.js

8251-ab00b15f740ee509.js

77 ms

index-07fe33c806a78f75.js

index-07fe33c806a78f75.js

74 ms

_buildManifest.js

_buildManifest.js

92 ms

_ssgManifest.js

_ssgManifest.js

93 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

74 ms

Accessibility Review

24etar.net accessibility score

80

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

24etar.net best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

24etar.net SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    AR

  • Language Claimed

    AR

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise 24etar.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Arabic is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that 24etar.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

24etar.net

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of 24 Etar. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: