Tools & Wizards About Us
256bit.by screenshot

Report Summary

  • 87

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    89% of other websites

  • 69

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 34% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 90

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    68% of websites

256bit.by

Компьютерный интернет магазин 256bit.by Беларусь

Page Load Speed

3.8 sec in total

First Response

691 ms

Resources Loaded

2.8 sec

Page Rendered

284 ms

256bit.by screenshot

About Website

Visit 256bit.by now to see the best up-to-date 256 Bit content for Belarus and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about 256bit.by

Наша фирма существует на рынке Беларуси более 10 лет, а продажи через интернет мы осуществляем с 2012 года. Наш офис находиться в Гродно по адресу Советская 5-1. Мы являемся первым импортером компьюте...

Visit 256bit.by

Key Findings

We analyzed 256bit.by page load time and found that the first response time was 691 ms and then it took 3.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

256bit.by performance score

87

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.7 s

60/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.9 s

80/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.9 s

64/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value90 ms

99/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.2 s

94/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

256bit.by

691 ms

notice.min.css

226 ms

ui.design-tokens.min.css

231 ms

template_276664c1baac46e25d6092c2d3606949_v1.css

805 ms

popup.min.css

233 ms

Our browser made a total of 42 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 90% of them (38 requests) were addressed to the original 256bit.by, 5% (2 requests) were made to Bitrix.info and 2% (1 request) were made to . The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1 sec) belongs to the original domain 256bit.by.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 875.3 kB (24%)

Content Size

3.6 MB

After Optimization

2.7 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of 256bit.by main page is 3.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 179.1 kB

  • Original 209.3 kB
  • After minification 163.7 kB
  • After compression 30.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 45.7 kB, which is 22% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 179.1 kB or 86% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-21%

Potential reduce by 533.5 kB

  • Original 2.6 MB
  • After minification 2.1 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, 256 Bit needs image optimization as it can save up to 533.5 kB or 21% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-14%

Potential reduce by 71.0 kB

  • Original 504.9 kB
  • After minification 504.5 kB
  • After compression 433.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 71.0 kB or 14% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-30%

Potential reduce by 91.6 kB

  • Original 304.4 kB
  • After minification 304.4 kB
  • After compression 212.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. 256bit.by needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 91.6 kB or 30% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 25 (64%)

Requests Now

39

After Optimization

14

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 39 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of 256 Bit. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 21 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

256bit.by

256bit.by

691 ms

notice.min.css

notice.min.css

226 ms

ui.design-tokens.min.css

ui.design-tokens.min.css

231 ms

template_276664c1baac46e25d6092c2d3606949_v1.css

template_276664c1baac46e25d6092c2d3606949_v1.css

805 ms

popup.min.css

popup.min.css

233 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

364 ms

kernel_main_v1.js

kernel_main_v1.js

487 ms

protobuf.min.js

protobuf.min.js

450 ms

model.min.js

model.min.js

344 ms

rest.client.min.js

rest.client.min.js

349 ms

pull.client.min.js

pull.client.min.js

574 ms

ajax.min.js

ajax.min.js

467 ms

notice.min.js

notice.min.js

486 ms

currency-core.bundle.min.js

currency-core.bundle.min.js

561 ms

core_currency.min.js

core_currency.min.js

583 ms

critical.min.css

critical.min.css

607 ms

observer.js

observer.js

607 ms

ls.unveilhooks.min.js

ls.unveilhooks.min.js

673 ms

lazysizes.min.js

lazysizes.min.js

688 ms

jquery-3.6.0.min.js

jquery-3.6.0.min.js

885 ms

speed.min.js

speed.min.js

728 ms

bottom_panel.js

bottom_panel.js

728 ms

template_90320ed11c477e0577708f396e26e951_v1.js

template_90320ed11c477e0577708f396e26e951_v1.js

1011 ms

default_fa1dddf37d8ad9e2775006103e72c8f4_v1.js

default_fa1dddf37d8ad9e2775006103e72c8f4_v1.js

884 ms

setTheme.php

setTheme.php

894 ms

ba.js

ba.js

148 ms

ygekkrdkoqwz1c3tz7bgquiypvcz030j.png

ygekkrdkoqwz1c3tz7bgquiypvcz030j.png

146 ms

double_ring.svg

double_ring.svg

142 ms

header_icons_srite.svg

header_icons_srite.svg

142 ms

trianglearrow_sprite.svg

trianglearrow_sprite.svg

127 ms

header_icons.svg

header_icons.svg

124 ms

PAJJhLM6sSoWKfWCAAwDAjgbRAAB42mNgYGBkAIIbCZo5IPrmUn0hGA0AO8EFTQAA

PAJJhLM6sSoWKfWCAAwDAjgbRAAB42mNgYGBkAIIbCZo5IPrmUn0hGA0AO8EFTQAA

15 ms

social.svg

social.svg

461 ms

payment.svg

payment.svg

246 ms

tag.js

tag.js

973 ms

bx_stat

bx_stat

100 ms

zmffv2p8t4gprexpge31z0sb4svxfgxd.png

zmffv2p8t4gprexpge31z0sb4svxfgxd.png

494 ms

igq0m1634kqj4js0034cdeqi1tmlq4wn.png

igq0m1634kqj4js0034cdeqi1tmlq4wn.png

473 ms

3gmc294klx65tjlxibgtwtkqa11cem89.png

3gmc294klx65tjlxibgtwtkqa11cem89.png

340 ms

jtzeeuvro4o4v1ohp2ovsjw36reym6jn.png

jtzeeuvro4o4v1ohp2ovsjw36reym6jn.png

348 ms

0ie9ewtrypgbmsxn3w16i7y80rqbltve.png

0ie9ewtrypgbmsxn3w16i7y80rqbltve.png

640 ms

print.min.css

print.min.css

123 ms

Accessibility Review

256bit.by accessibility score

69

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

256bit.by best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

SEO Factors

256bit.by SEO score

90

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    RU

  • Language Claimed

    RU

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise 256bit.by can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that 256bit.by main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

256bit.by

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of 256 Bit. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: