Report Summary

  • 22

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    40% of other websites

  • 85

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 60% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 74

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    32% of websites

26point2.co.uk

26.2 Road Runners Club | Surbiton's friendly running club. Open to runners of all standards, fast or slow. We participate in local races of all d...

Page Load Speed

8.4 sec in total

First Response

1.3 sec

Resources Loaded

5.1 sec

Page Rendered

1.9 sec

26point2.co.uk screenshot

About Website

Visit 26point2.co.uk now to see the best up-to-date 26 Point 2 content for United Kingdom and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about 26point2.co.uk

Surbiton's friendly running club. Open to runners of all standards, fast or slow. We participate in local races of all distances.

Visit 26point2.co.uk

Key Findings

We analyzed 26point2.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 1.3 sec and then it took 7.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

26point2.co.uk performance score

22

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.9 s

24/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.9 s

3/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value13.4 s

2/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,700 ms

11/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.015

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value15.8 s

6/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.26point2.co.uk

1334 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

161 ms

0f3f6a83_ai1ec_parsed_css.css

472 ms

twentyfourteen.css

173 ms

bbpress.css

166 ms

Our browser made a total of 79 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 44% of them (35 requests) were addressed to the original 26point2.co.uk, 9% (7 requests) were made to I2.wp.com and 9% (7 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.2 sec) relates to the external source I1.wp.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.2 MB (48%)

Content Size

2.5 MB

After Optimization

1.3 MB

In fact, the total size of 26point2.co.uk main page is 2.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 82.1 kB

  • Original 102.9 kB
  • After minification 98.0 kB
  • After compression 20.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 82.1 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 40.7 kB

  • Original 930.9 kB
  • After minification 890.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. 26 Point 2 images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-71%

Potential reduce by 798.0 kB

  • Original 1.1 MB
  • After minification 1.1 MB
  • After compression 321.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 798.0 kB or 71% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 289.4 kB

  • Original 359.4 kB
  • After minification 275.4 kB
  • After compression 70.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. 26point2.co.uk needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 289.4 kB or 81% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 37 (55%)

Requests Now

67

After Optimization

30

The browser has sent 67 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of 26 Point 2. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 21 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 18 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

26point2.co.uk accessibility score

85

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

26point2.co.uk best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

26point2.co.uk SEO score

74

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise 26point2.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that 26point2.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of 26 Point 2. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: