Report Summary

  • 85

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    88% of other websites

  • 86

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 61% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

Page Load Speed

121 ms in total

First Response

32 ms

Resources Loaded

37 ms

Page Rendered

52 ms

2plus4.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing 2 Plus 4 content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about 2plus4.com

Visit 2plus4.com

Key Findings

We analyzed 2plus4.com page load time and found that the first response time was 32 ms and then it took 89 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only a small number of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

2plus4.com performance score

85

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.2 s

44/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.3 s

69/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.2 s

92/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.033

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.2 s

95/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

2plus4.com

32 ms

bWNNLotWY.js

5 ms

Our browser made a total of 2 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to 2plus4.com and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (32 ms) belongs to the original domain 2plus4.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 338.3 kB (69%)

Content Size

489.6 kB

After Optimization

151.3 kB

In fact, the total size of 2plus4.com main page is 489.6 kB. This result falls within a vast category (top 1 000 000) of heavyweight, probably not optimized, and thus slow loading web pages. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 369.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-27%

Potential reduce by 282 B

  • Original 1.0 kB
  • After minification 1.0 kB
  • After compression 753 B

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 282 B or 27% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-29%

Potential reduce by 19.0 kB

  • Original 65.9 kB
  • After minification 46.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, 2 Plus 4 needs image optimization as it can save up to 19.0 kB or 29% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-13%

Potential reduce by 6.8 kB

  • Original 53.3 kB
  • After minification 53.3 kB
  • After compression 46.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 6.8 kB or 13% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 312.1 kB

  • Original 369.3 kB
  • After minification 369.1 kB
  • After compression 57.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. 2plus4.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 312.1 kB or 85% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

1

After Optimization

1

The browser has sent 1 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of 2 Plus 4. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Accessibility Review

2plus4.com accessibility score

86

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Best Practices

2plus4.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

SEO Factors

2plus4.com SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't use legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise 2plus4.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that 2plus4.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of 2 Plus 4. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: