1.2 sec in total
395 ms
627 ms
220 ms
Click here to check amazing 32 Bit content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about 32bit.com
Get free bulk email software to run successful email campaigns with easy to use mass email sender and email verifier programs.
Visit 32bit.comWe analyzed 32bit.com page load time and found that the first response time was 395 ms and then it took 847 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.
32bit.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.9 s
53/100
10%
Value6.0 s
13/100
25%
Value4.0 s
81/100
10%
Value430 ms
65/100
30%
Value0.062
97/100
15%
Value8.7 s
36/100
10%
395 ms
26 ms
26 ms
58 ms
19 ms
Our browser made a total of 59 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 88% of them (52 requests) were addressed to the original 32bit.com, 7% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (395 ms) belongs to the original domain 32bit.com.
Page size can be reduced by 242.3 kB (43%)
560.1 kB
317.8 kB
In fact, the total size of 32bit.com main page is 560.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 254.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 17.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 17.2 kB or 74% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 29.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, 32 Bit needs image optimization as it can save up to 29.3 kB or 12% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 97.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 97.2 kB or 58% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 98.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. 32bit.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 98.6 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 10 (19%)
54
44
The browser has sent 54 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of 32 Bit. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
32bit.com
395 ms
css
26 ms
style.css
26 ms
jquery-1.8.3.min.js
58 ms
jquery.easing.1.3.js
19 ms
superfish.js
73 ms
sequence.jquery-min.js
21 ms
sequence-slider.js
19 ms
jquery.fancybox-1.3.4.pack.js
69 ms
jQuery.BlackAndWhite.min.js
70 ms
jquery.accordion.2.0.min.js
70 ms
jquery.quicksand.js
70 ms
main.js
74 ms
ga.js
103 ms
header-bg.png
87 ms
facebook.png
84 ms
skype.png
85 ms
twitter.png
88 ms
flickr.png
86 ms
vimeo.png
82 ms
rss.png
87 ms
search-submit.png
90 ms
logo.png
89 ms
bt-prev.png
88 ms
bt-next.png
92 ms
icon-get-theme.png
89 ms
emai-marketing-studio.png
90 ms
bulk-mailer-small.jpg
93 ms
email-verifier-small.jpg
97 ms
comp.png
92 ms
seo.png
91 ms
gears.png
93 ms
prev-small.png
95 ms
next-small.png
94 ms
reade-more-bg.png
93 ms
bulk-mailer-thumb.jpg
96 ms
email-verifier-thumb.jpg
98 ms
email-autoresponder-thumb.jpg
96 ms
email-verifier-lite-thumb.jpg
97 ms
mail-big-icon.png
100 ms
gmc.jpg
98 ms
mae.jpg
100 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTYnF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
87 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
90 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzInF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
95 ms
PRmiXeptR36kaC0GEAetxrfB31yxOzP-czbf6AAKCVo.ttf
93 ms
rhsmith.jpg
97 ms
barrytickets.png
86 ms
umich.jpg
87 ms
scripps.jpg
85 ms
iastate.jpg
87 ms
ecampus.png
83 ms
drexel.jpg
59 ms
footer-bg.png
56 ms
icon_footer_loc.png
55 ms
icon_footer_mail.png
56 ms
footer-copyright-bg.png
56 ms
back-top.png
53 ms
__utm.gif
24 ms
32bit.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
32bit.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
32bit.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise 32bit.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that 32bit.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
32bit.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of 32 Bit. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: