Tools & Wizards About Us
3d-engineering.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 10

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    23% of other websites

  • 84

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 58% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 96

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    91% of websites

3d-engineering.net

3D Scanning Services & Metrology Services | 3D Engineering Solutions

Page Load Speed

2.9 sec in total

First Response

135 ms

Resources Loaded

2.2 sec

Page Rendered

480 ms

3d-engineering.net screenshot

About Website

Visit 3d-engineering.net now to see the best up-to-date 3D Engineering content for Pakistan and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about 3d-engineering.net

3D Engineering Solutions provides expertise in 3D scanning services, reverse engineering, and ISO 17025-accredited integrated metrology services.

Visit 3d-engineering.net

Key Findings

We analyzed 3d-engineering.net page load time and found that the first response time was 135 ms and then it took 2.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

3d-engineering.net performance score

10

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.9 s

10/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.9 s

7/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.0 s

21/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,740 ms

10/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.559

13/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value16.8 s

5/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

3d-engineering.net

135 ms

gtm.js

87 ms

layerslider.css

22 ms

style.min.css

59 ms

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

42 ms

Our browser made a total of 88 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 70% of them (62 requests) were addressed to the original 3d-engineering.net, 7% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 5% (4 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1 sec) belongs to the original domain 3d-engineering.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 118.3 kB (3%)

Content Size

3.4 MB

After Optimization

3.3 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of 3d-engineering.net main page is 3.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 3.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 111.2 kB

  • Original 136.3 kB
  • After minification 133.8 kB
  • After compression 25.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 111.2 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 6.0 kB

  • Original 3.3 MB
  • After minification 3.3 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. 3D Engineering images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 1.1 kB

  • Original 40.6 kB
  • After minification 40.5 kB
  • After compression 39.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 47 (61%)

Requests Now

77

After Optimization

30

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 77 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of 3D Engineering. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 32 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 17 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

3d-engineering.net

3d-engineering.net

135 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

87 ms

layerslider.css

layerslider.css

22 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

59 ms

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

42 ms

wp-mediaelement.min.css

wp-mediaelement.min.css

142 ms

grid.css

grid.css

61 ms

base.css

base.css

43 ms

layout.css

layout.css

29 ms

shortcodes.css

shortcodes.css

60 ms

magnific-popup.css

magnific-popup.css

55 ms

enfold_child.css

enfold_child.css

47 ms

custom.css

custom.css

79 ms

style.css

style.css

81 ms

greensock.js

greensock.js

128 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

128 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

78 ms

layerslider.kreaturamedia.jquery.js

layerslider.kreaturamedia.jquery.js

127 ms

layerslider.transitions.js

layerslider.transitions.js

132 ms

avia-compat.js

avia-compat.js

126 ms

webtraxs.js

webtraxs.js

134 ms

js

js

75 ms

swap.js

swap.js

134 ms

css

css

123 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

129 ms

email-decode.min.js

email-decode.min.js

128 ms

dashicons.min.css

dashicons.min.css

129 ms

display-structure.css

display-structure.css

325 ms

avia.js

avia.js

324 ms

shortcodes.js

shortcodes.js

347 ms

jquery.magnific-popup.min.js

jquery.magnific-popup.min.js

350 ms

mediaelement-and-player.min.js

mediaelement-and-player.min.js

348 ms

mediaelement-migrate.min.js

mediaelement-migrate.min.js

418 ms

wp-mediaelement.min.js

wp-mediaelement.min.js

416 ms

comment-reply.min.js

comment-reply.min.js

349 ms

underscore.min.js

underscore.min.js

417 ms

backbone.min.js

backbone.min.js

417 ms

front-end-deps.js

front-end-deps.js

442 ms

front-end.js

front-end.js

441 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

335 ms

hotjar-1493201.js

hotjar-1493201.js

755 ms

loader.js

loader.js

331 ms

js

js

324 ms

webtraxs.php

webtraxs.php

814 ms

js

js

245 ms

WidgetScript

WidgetScript

660 ms

3d-engineering-logo.png

3d-engineering-logo.png

207 ms

turbine.jpg

turbine.jpg

698 ms

reverse-engineering.jpg

reverse-engineering.jpg

771 ms

methodology.jpg

methodology.jpg

664 ms

scanner.jpg

scanner.jpg

666 ms

computer.jpg

computer.jpg

809 ms

ANAB-ILAC-Color-17025-Calibration-and-Dimensional-Measurement-Transparent-Bkgr-300x141.png

ANAB-ILAC-Color-17025-Calibration-and-Dimensional-Measurement-Transparent-Bkgr-300x141.png

375 ms

ITARVOSB-300x151.jpg

ITARVOSB-300x151.jpg

430 ms

gsa-300x100.jpg

gsa-300x100.jpg

665 ms

AmericaMakes-300x133.jpg

AmericaMakes-300x133.jpg

727 ms

Augmenting-Structured-Light-300x181.jpg

Augmenting-Structured-Light-300x181.jpg

727 ms

3DES-ANAB-300x128.jpg

3DES-ANAB-300x128.jpg

728 ms

CT-Scanners-300x225.jpg

CT-Scanners-300x225.jpg

772 ms

map-1.jpg

map-1.jpg

838 ms

youtube.png

youtube.png

836 ms

twitter.png

twitter.png

838 ms

linkedin.png

linkedin.png

842 ms

box1.jpg

box1.jpg

958 ms

Metrology-Service.jpg

Metrology-Service.jpg

892 ms

Multi-Sensor_VisionSystem.jpg

Multi-Sensor_VisionSystem.jpg

955 ms

Reverse_Engineering-1.jpg

Reverse_Engineering-1.jpg

955 ms

Long_Range_Laser_Scanning-1.jpg

Long_Range_Laser_Scanning-1.jpg

954 ms

Design_Engineering.jpg

Design_Engineering.jpg

955 ms

conversion_async.js

conversion_async.js

538 ms

S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWA.woff

S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWA.woff

499 ms

S6uyw4BMUTPHjxAwWDeu.woff

S6uyw4BMUTPHjxAwWDeu.woff

573 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwiPHw.woff

S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwiPHw.woff

644 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwaPHx_p.woff

S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwaPHx_p.woff

647 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwiPHw.woff

S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwiPHw.woff

694 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwaPHx_p.woff

S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwaPHx_p.woff

693 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

1007 ms

entypo-fontello.woff

entypo-fontello.woff

811 ms

collect

collect

81 ms

call-tracking_7.js

call-tracking_7.js

62 ms

collect

collect

417 ms

skin.css

skin.css

1016 ms

modules.61e17720cf639c3e96a7.js

modules.61e17720cf639c3e96a7.js

298 ms

box-69edcc3187336f9b0a3fbb4c73be9fe6.html

box-69edcc3187336f9b0a3fbb4c73be9fe6.html

248 ms

220 ms

wcm

wcm

398 ms

229 ms

print.css

print.css

14 ms

Accessibility Review

3d-engineering.net accessibility score

84

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

3d-engineering.net best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

3d-engineering.net SEO score

96

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise 3d-engineering.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that 3d-engineering.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

3d-engineering.net

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of 3D Engineering. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: