Tools & Wizards About Us
4-e.gr screenshot

Report Summary

  • 88

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    90% of other websites

  • 64

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 29% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 77

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    36% of websites

4-e.gr

4Ε Σύμβουλοι Επιχειρήσεων - Προγράμματα Επιδοτήσεων ΕΣΠΑ για Επιχειρήσεις - Επιδοτήσεις ΕΣΠΑ - Νέος Επενδυτικός Νόμος - Επιδοτήσεις ΕΣΠΑ - 4Ε Σύμβουλο...

Page Load Speed

1.9 sec in total

First Response

237 ms

Resources Loaded

1.5 sec

Page Rendered

209 ms

4-e.gr screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing 4 E content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about 4-e.gr

Η εταιρεία μας διαθέτει μεγάλη εμπειρία, στην διαμόρφωση, σύνταξη και εκπόνηση επιχειρηματικών σχεδίων, μεγιστοποιώντας σημαντικά τις πιθανότητες έγκρισης, της επενδυτικής σας πρότασης. Αναλαμβάνουμε ...

Visit 4-e.gr

Key Findings

We analyzed 4-e.gr page load time and found that the first response time was 237 ms and then it took 1.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

4-e.gr performance score

88

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.1 s

81/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.3 s

69/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.5 s

88/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value100 ms

98/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.7 s

91/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

4-e.gr

237 ms

4-e.gr

617 ms

attachments1.css

115 ms

jcemediabox.css

183 ms

style.css

179 ms

Our browser made a total of 47 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 89% of them (42 requests) were addressed to the original 4-e.gr, 4% (2 requests) were made to Apis.google.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Ssl.google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (617 ms) belongs to the original domain 4-e.gr.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 75.9 kB (36%)

Content Size

209.3 kB

After Optimization

133.4 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of 4-e.gr main page is 209.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 91.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 45.3 kB

  • Original 55.6 kB
  • After minification 53.9 kB
  • After compression 10.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 45.3 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-16%

Potential reduce by 5.6 kB

  • Original 34.8 kB
  • After minification 29.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, 4 E needs image optimization as it can save up to 5.6 kB or 16% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-13%

Potential reduce by 12.2 kB

  • Original 91.6 kB
  • After minification 91.4 kB
  • After compression 79.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 12.2 kB or 13% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-47%

Potential reduce by 12.8 kB

  • Original 27.3 kB
  • After minification 27.0 kB
  • After compression 14.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. 4-e.gr needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 12.8 kB or 47% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 32 (73%)

Requests Now

44

After Optimization

12

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 44 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of 4 E. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 15 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

4-e.gr

4-e.gr

237 ms

4-e.gr

4-e.gr

617 ms

attachments1.css

attachments1.css

115 ms

jcemediabox.css

jcemediabox.css

183 ms

style.css

style.css

179 ms

calendar.css

calendar.css

187 ms

front.css

front.css

183 ms

style.css

style.css

185 ms

mediaobject-150.js

mediaobject-150.js

188 ms

mootools.js

mootools.js

300 ms

caption.js

caption.js

241 ms

attachments_refresh.js

attachments_refresh.js

241 ms

jcemediabox.js

jcemediabox.js

310 ms

silverlight.js

silverlight.js

243 ms

wmvplayer.js

wmvplayer.js

243 ms

swfobject.js

swfobject.js

314 ms

avreloaded.js

avreloaded.js

313 ms

script.js

script.js

315 ms

engine-mootools-11.js

engine-mootools-11.js

314 ms

system.css

system.css

385 ms

general.css

general.css

381 ms

template.css

template.css

386 ms

template_grey.css

template_grey.css

383 ms

jsn_iconlinks.css

jsn_iconlinks.css

381 ms

jsn_script.js

jsn_script.js

384 ms

plusone.js

plusone.js

28 ms

cb=gapi.loaded_0

cb=gapi.loaded_0

5 ms

ga.js

ga.js

82 ms

logo.png

logo.png

106 ms

searchButton.gif

searchButton.gif

109 ms

icon-module-home.png

icon-module-home.png

107 ms

icon-module-display.png

icon-module-display.png

107 ms

suckerfish-expand.png

suckerfish-expand.png

107 ms

promo-bg.jpg

promo-bg.jpg

105 ms

company_background.jpg

company_background.jpg

219 ms

leftside21-bg-full.png

leftside21-bg-full.png

165 ms

rightside21-bg-full.png

rightside21-bg-full.png

166 ms

bullettree-level0.png

bullettree-level0.png

165 ms

bullettree-level1.png

bullettree-level1.png

168 ms

ependytikos.gif

ependytikos.gif

165 ms

template.css

template.css

226 ms

popup.html

popup.html

186 ms

tooltip.html

tooltip.html

187 ms

usermodules3-bg.png

usermodules3-bg.png

182 ms

icon-link-mailto.png

icon-link-mailto.png

185 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

12 ms

collect

collect

44 ms

Accessibility Review

4-e.gr accessibility score

64

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<input type="image"> elements do not have [alt] text

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

4-e.gr best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

4-e.gr SEO score

77

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EL

  • Language Claimed

    EL

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise 4-e.gr can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Greek is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that 4-e.gr main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

4-e.gr

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of 4 E. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: