Tools & Wizards About Us
4fox.in screenshot

Report Summary

  • 34

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    54% of other websites

  • 83

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 54% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 84

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    52% of websites

4fox.in

IT Company in Nashik | Technology Partner in India - 4FOX Solutions

Page Load Speed

1.7 sec in total

First Response

64 ms

Resources Loaded

992 ms

Page Rendered

665 ms

4fox.in screenshot

About Website

Visit 4fox.in now to see the best up-to-date 4FOX content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about 4fox.in

4FOX Solutions is the one of best IT company in india located in Nashik. We are specialist in website design and development, branding, creative design, SEO, SEM/PPC, Mobile App services and blockchai...

Visit 4fox.in

Key Findings

We analyzed 4fox.in page load time and found that the first response time was 64 ms and then it took 1.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

4fox.in performance score

34

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.4 s

38/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.4 s

4/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.7 s

69/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,350 ms

17/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.058

98/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.0 s

27/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

4fox.in

64 ms

4foxsolutions.com

312 ms

magnific-popup.css

23 ms

jquery.mCustomScrollbar.min.css

48 ms

aos.css

63 ms

Our browser made a total of 95 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original 4fox.in, 81% (77 requests) were made to 4foxsolutions.com and 9% (9 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (328 ms) relates to the external source 4foxsolutions.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 434.7 kB (8%)

Content Size

5.5 MB

After Optimization

5.1 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of 4fox.in main page is 5.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 5.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-92%

Potential reduce by 99.9 kB

  • Original 108.6 kB
  • After minification 53.9 kB
  • After compression 8.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 54.7 kB, which is 50% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 99.9 kB or 92% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 321.9 kB

  • Original 5.2 MB
  • After minification 4.9 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. 4FOX images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-8%

Potential reduce by 6.5 kB

  • Original 79.0 kB
  • After minification 79.0 kB
  • After compression 72.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-8%

Potential reduce by 6.3 kB

  • Original 82.1 kB
  • After minification 82.1 kB
  • After compression 75.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. 4fox.in has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 23 (28%)

Requests Now

82

After Optimization

59

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 82 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of 4FOX. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

4fox.in

4fox.in

64 ms

4foxsolutions.com

4foxsolutions.com

312 ms

magnific-popup.css

magnific-popup.css

23 ms

jquery.mCustomScrollbar.min.css

jquery.mCustomScrollbar.min.css

48 ms

aos.css

aos.css

63 ms

slick.css

slick.css

69 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

64 ms

init.css

init.css

63 ms

ststyle.css

ststyle.css

83 ms

style.css

style.css

74 ms

istyle.css

istyle.css

86 ms

device.css

device.css

117 ms

all.css

all.css

55 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

37 ms

js

js

70 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

106 ms

jquery-3.5.1.min.js

jquery-3.5.1.min.js

22 ms

slick.min.js

slick.min.js

86 ms

jquery.magnific-popup.js

jquery.magnific-popup.js

95 ms

jquery.mCustomScrollbar.min.js

jquery.mCustomScrollbar.min.js

171 ms

aos.js

aos.js

105 ms

site.inc.js

site.inc.js

176 ms

mainsite.inc.js

mainsite.inc.js

112 ms

stscript.js

stscript.js

175 ms

css2

css2

30 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

152 ms

foxlogo.png

foxlogo.png

117 ms

lt-btn-new.png

lt-btn-new.png

117 ms

5932.png

5932.png

122 ms

59321.png

59321.png

121 ms

8911.png

8911.png

122 ms

89111.png

89111.png

120 ms

5747.png

5747.png

124 ms

5747.jpg

5747.jpg

121 ms

sec2bann.png

sec2bann.png

127 ms

3294.jpg

3294.jpg

125 ms

5026.jpg

5026.jpg

124 ms

4240.jpg

4240.jpg

122 ms

1335.jpg

1335.jpg

124 ms

2903.jpg

2903.jpg

126 ms

1935.jpg

1935.jpg

127 ms

7242.jpg

7242.jpg

128 ms

403.jpg

403.jpg

192 ms

6745.jpg

6745.jpg

129 ms

645.jpg

645.jpg

128 ms

9824.jpg

9824.jpg

190 ms

7069.jpg

7069.jpg

192 ms

7646.jpg

7646.jpg

239 ms

5300.jpg

5300.jpg

193 ms

4626.jpg

4626.jpg

240 ms

4484.jpg

4484.jpg

239 ms

1912.jpg

1912.jpg

241 ms

7808.jpg

7808.jpg

239 ms

8314.jpg

8314.jpg

240 ms

8020.jpg

8020.jpg

299 ms

6238.jpg

6238.jpg

298 ms

1274.jpg

1274.jpg

298 ms

3316.jpg

3316.jpg

299 ms

2723.jpg

2723.jpg

285 ms

jquery.mousewheel.min.js

jquery.mousewheel.min.js

99 ms

strategy.png

strategy.png

279 ms

shado-img.png

shado-img.png

249 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Ew-.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Ew-.ttf

131 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Ew-.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Ew-.ttf

187 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Ew-.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Ew-.ttf

188 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr6Ew-.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr6Ew-.ttf

211 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Uw-.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Uw-.ttf

211 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu170w-.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu170w-.ttf

210 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM70w-.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM70w-.ttf

210 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr70w-.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr70w-.ttf

210 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvC70w-.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvC70w-.ttf

210 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

129 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

248 ms

market-Line1.png

market-Line1.png

244 ms

market-line2.png

market-line2.png

236 ms

develop.png

develop.png

241 ms

market-line3.png

market-line3.png

204 ms

support.png

support.png

233 ms

1612789526388931162513021307.gif

1612789526388931162513021307.gif

233 ms

blockchain.gif

blockchain.gif

328 ms

16127929921598061607925208612.gif

16127929921598061607925208612.gif

267 ms

161278962920049071971149580094.gif

161278962920049071971149580094.gif

261 ms

161278968216133562921805571624.gif

161278968216133562921805571624.gif

286 ms

161279061519878381631673686081.gif

161279061519878381631673686081.gif

262 ms

7176.jpg

7176.jpg

260 ms

561.jpg

561.jpg

268 ms

8636.jpg

8636.jpg

271 ms

homefbgimg1.jpg

homefbgimg1.jpg

271 ms

msgicon.png

msgicon.png

275 ms

homefbgimg2.jpg

homefbgimg2.jpg

283 ms

lampicon.png

lampicon.png

227 ms

popbanner.jpg

popbanner.jpg

236 ms

4foxfooter.png

4foxfooter.png

227 ms

left-arrow.png

left-arrow.png

240 ms

right-arrow.png

right-arrow.png

202 ms

Accessibility Review

4fox.in accessibility score

83

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best Practices

4fox.in best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

4fox.in SEO score

84

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise 4fox.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that 4fox.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

4fox.in

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of 4FOX. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: