5.7 sec in total
1.1 sec
4.2 sec
384 ms
Welcome to 4gmark.com homepage info - get ready to check 4 Gmark best content for France right away, or after learning these important things about 4gmark.com
5GMARK - Mobile performance test
Visit 4gmark.comWe analyzed 4gmark.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.1 sec and then it took 4.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
4gmark.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.4 s
17/100
10%
Value14.9 s
0/100
25%
Value11.0 s
6/100
10%
Value1,450 ms
15/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value13.7 s
10/100
10%
1075 ms
1340 ms
87 ms
168 ms
241 ms
Our browser made a total of 83 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original 4gmark.com, 78% (65 requests) were made to 5gmark.com and 16% (13 requests) were made to Media.5gmark.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) relates to the external source 5gmark.com.
Page size can be reduced by 356.5 kB (8%)
4.3 MB
3.9 MB
In fact, the total size of 4gmark.com main page is 4.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 69.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 30.7 kB, which is 38% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 69.5 kB or 87% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 278.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. 4 Gmark images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 5.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 3.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. 4gmark.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 48 (61%)
79
31
The browser has sent 79 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of 4 Gmark. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 25 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
4gmark.com
1075 ms
www.5gmark.com
1340 ms
bootstrap.min.css
87 ms
style.css
168 ms
styles.css
241 ms
roboto.css
241 ms
owl.theme.css
242 ms
owl.carousel.css
242 ms
nivo-lightbox.css
250 ms
default.css
246 ms
animate.min.css
324 ms
styles.css
323 ms
blue.css
322 ms
responsive.css
321 ms
jquery.min.js
335 ms
ammap.js
559 ms
worldLow.js
587 ms
black.js
409 ms
www.5gmark.com
900 ms
amcharts.js
593 ms
serial.js
504 ms
light.js
489 ms
bootstrap.min.js
401 ms
jquery.scrollTo.min.js
399 ms
jquery.localScroll.min.js
399 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
400 ms
nivo-lightbox.min.js
413 ms
simple-expand.min.js
479 ms
wow.min.js
479 ms
jquery.stellar.min.js
479 ms
retina.min.js
480 ms
jquery.nav.js
492 ms
matchMedia.js
562 ms
jquery.ajaxchimp.min.js
563 ms
jquery.fitvids.js
563 ms
custom.js
562 ms
js
45 ms
loading.gif
230 ms
5gmark-inline.png
297 ms
en.png
297 ms
fr.png
296 ms
es.png
299 ms
pt.png
308 ms
de.png
376 ms
it.png
376 ms
icone_appli-gratuite.jpg
376 ms
icone_usage-flotte.jpg
379 ms
icone_marque-blanche.jpg
387 ms
icone_appli-pro.jpg
454 ms
bt_app-store.png
455 ms
bt_google_play.png
455 ms
bg_home-nationales.jpg
318 ms
h1_best-operator.png
106 ms
scroller.png
105 ms
bg_stats-score.png
105 ms
bg_indice-4g.jpg
104 ms
stats_youtube.png
106 ms
stats_web.png
160 ms
icon_android.png
160 ms
icon_apple.png
161 ms
bg_stats-classement.png
161 ms
bg_home-carte.jpg
256 ms
5gmark-download.png
876 ms
5gmark-square.png
240 ms
glyphicons-halflings-regular.woff
258 ms
bt_facebook.png
177 ms
bt_twitter-footer.png
256 ms
analytics.js
43 ms
www.5gmark.com
443 ms
logo_310260.png
83 ms
logo_310410.png
160 ms
empty.png
85 ms
www.5gmark.com
519 ms
map.us.png
384 ms
collect
13 ms
js
40 ms
logo_310260.png
82 ms
logo_310410.png
80 ms
map.us.png
83 ms
logo_310260.png
82 ms
icon_dl.jpg
80 ms
icon_ul.jpg
83 ms
logo_310260.png
82 ms
4gmark.com accessibility score
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
4gmark.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
4gmark.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise 4gmark.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that 4gmark.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
4gmark.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of 4 Gmark. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: