4 sec in total
442 ms
3.2 sec
358 ms
Welcome to 4maps.eu homepage info - get ready to check 4Maps best content right away, or after learning these important things about 4maps.eu
Smart Cities and Transportation, Navigation, 3D Maps and Data Acquisition, Urbanism Applications, Comparative Tests and Consultancy
Visit 4maps.euWe analyzed 4maps.eu page load time and found that the first response time was 442 ms and then it took 3.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
4maps.eu performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.9 s
51/100
10%
Value4.7 s
32/100
25%
Value5.8 s
49/100
10%
Value130 ms
96/100
30%
Value1.022
2/100
15%
Value5.6 s
70/100
10%
442 ms
199 ms
303 ms
17 ms
436 ms
Our browser made a total of 81 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 75% of them (61 requests) were addressed to the original 4maps.eu, 17% (14 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 5% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.6 sec) belongs to the original domain 4maps.eu.
Page size can be reduced by 107.7 kB (4%)
2.5 MB
2.4 MB
In fact, the total size of 4maps.eu main page is 2.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 37.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 37.2 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 60.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. 4Maps images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 8.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 2.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. 4maps.eu has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 36 (56%)
64
28
The browser has sent 64 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of 4Maps. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 19 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
4maps.eu
442 ms
language-selector.css
199 ms
style.css
303 ms
css
17 ms
bootstrap.min.css
436 ms
style.css
308 ms
animate.min.css
270 ms
additional.css
312 ms
theme.css
373 ms
font-awesome.min.css
403 ms
elementor-icons.min.css
479 ms
font-awesome.min.css
452 ms
animations.min.css
495 ms
frontend.min.css
549 ms
global.css
584 ms
post-127.css
614 ms
jquery.js
745 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
613 ms
css
32 ms
jquery.viewportchecker.js
665 ms
jquery.touchSwipe.min.js
680 ms
bootstrap.min.js
755 ms
bootstrap-carousel-swipe.js
745 ms
SmoothScroll.js
785 ms
script.js
840 ms
script.min.js
816 ms
jarallax.js
913 ms
formoid.min.js
915 ms
custom.js
927 ms
wp-embed.min.js
922 ms
sitepress.js
953 ms
slick.min.js
984 ms
waypoints.min.js
1048 ms
frontend.min.js
1089 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
842 ms
style.css
801 ms
css
18 ms
css
18 ms
analytics.js
64 ms
logo.png
201 ms
en.png
197 ms
tr.png
197 ms
slider1-2000x1333-82.jpg
626 ms
slider6.jpg
995 ms
slider3-2000x1333-9-1.jpg
759 ms
bg.jpg
914 ms
2-600x400-67-1.jpg
505 ms
1-600x400-46-1.jpg
622 ms
4.jpg
1080 ms
5-2000x1333-68-1024x682.jpg
1194 ms
slider2-2000x1333-47-1024x682.jpg
800 ms
Group-4-150x150.png
946 ms
Group-5-1-150x150.png
977 ms
meb_logo-150x150.png
1089 ms
apple_logo-1-150x150.png
1120 ms
esri-500x500-150x150.png
1151 ms
1481435-150x150.png
1165 ms
orig-150x150.png
1262 ms
HERE_logo-150x150.png
1262 ms
omVYVng8-150x150.png
1294 ms
icon-side.png
1323 ms
home.gif
1592 ms
logo-footer.png
1361 ms
4iCs6KVjbNBYlgoKfw7z.ttf
113 ms
4iCs6KVjbNBYlgoKcQ7z.ttf
150 ms
4iCs6KVjbNBYlgoKcQ7z.ttf
14 ms
4iCv6KVjbNBYlgoCjC3jsGyI.ttf
159 ms
4iCv6KVjbNBYlgoC1CzjsGyI.ttf
158 ms
4iCv6KVjbNBYlgoC1CzjvmyI.ttf
164 ms
4iCv6KVjbNBYlgoC1CzjvmyI.ttf
112 ms
4iCv6KVjbNBYlgoCxCvjsGyI.ttf
158 ms
4iCv6KVjbNBYlgoCxCvjvmyI.ttf
162 ms
4iCv6KVjbNBYlgoCxCvjvmyI.ttf
113 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
1394 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
1402 ms
ajax-loader.gif
1278 ms
collect
26 ms
4iCu6KVjbNBYlgoKej70l0w.ttf
16 ms
4iCp6KVjbNBYlgoKejYHtFyPN4Q.ttf
22 ms
4iCp6KVjbNBYlgoKejZftVyPN4Q.ttf
21 ms
4iCp6KVjbNBYlgoKejZPslyPN4Q.ttf
22 ms
4maps.eu accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles
[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents
ARIA input fields do not have accessible names
Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
4maps.eu best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
4maps.eu SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise 4maps.eu can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that 4maps.eu main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
4maps.eu
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of 4Maps. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: