12.1 sec in total
2.7 sec
9.1 sec
324 ms
Welcome to 64-bit.co.uk homepage info - get ready to check 64 Bit best content right away, or after learning these important things about 64-bit.co.uk
Computer repairs Swansea, all makes and models repaired or serviced. Laptop, Macbook, Desktop, iMac, Gaming PC and Tablet repairs - 64-BIT computing
Visit 64-bit.co.ukWe analyzed 64-bit.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 2.7 sec and then it took 9.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.
64-bit.co.uk performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value10.4 s
0/100
10%
Value19.0 s
0/100
25%
Value19.3 s
0/100
10%
Value680 ms
43/100
30%
Value0.332
34/100
15%
Value19.6 s
2/100
10%
2735 ms
199 ms
309 ms
318 ms
432 ms
Our browser made a total of 84 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 88% of them (74 requests) were addressed to the original 64-bit.co.uk, 2% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Stats.wp.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.7 sec) belongs to the original domain 64-bit.co.uk.
Page size can be reduced by 1.4 MB (59%)
2.4 MB
991.5 kB
In fact, the total size of 64-bit.co.uk main page is 2.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 1.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 88.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 88.9 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. 64 Bit images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 298.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 298.1 kB or 45% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.0 MB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. 64-bit.co.uk needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.0 MB or 87% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 57 (72%)
79
22
The browser has sent 79 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of 64 Bit. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 30 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 29 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
64-bit.co.uk
2735 ms
mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css
199 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.css
309 ms
styles.css
318 ms
woocommerce-layout.css
432 ms
woocommerce.css
600 ms
css
38 ms
bootstrap.css
582 ms
style.css
538 ms
font-awesome.min.css
475 ms
elementor-icons.min.css
458 ms
frontend.min.css
1043 ms
swiper.min.css
601 ms
post-13680.css
585 ms
animate.css
972 ms
sliders.min.css
701 ms
icomoon.css
732 ms
lae-frontend.css
765 ms
lae-grid.css
739 ms
lae-widgets.min.css
1036 ms
font-awesome.min.css
898 ms
post-226.css
859 ms
social-logos.min.css
884 ms
css
33 ms
jetpack.css
1205 ms
jquery.min.js
1130 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
1023 ms
jquery.blockUI.min.js
1082 ms
add-to-cart.min.js
1131 ms
js.cookie.min.js
1146 ms
woocommerce.min.js
1145 ms
s-202436.js
19 ms
js
68 ms
js
41 ms
wc-blocks.css
1130 ms
slick.css
1255 ms
post-263.css
1253 ms
animations.min.css
1255 ms
hooks.min.js
1254 ms
i18n.min.js
1255 ms
index.js
1255 ms
api.js
63 ms
e-202436.js
2 ms
index.js
1313 ms
bootstrap.min.js
1237 ms
customscript.js
1082 ms
eu-cookie-law.min.js
1073 ms
sourcebuster.min.js
1026 ms
order-attribution.min.js
972 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
1063 ms
index.js
985 ms
cart-fragments.min.js
941 ms
slick.min.js
982 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
947 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
994 ms
waypoints.min.js
911 ms
core.min.js
890 ms
frontend.min.js
963 ms
logo.png
427 ms
computer-repair-slide.jpg
622 ms
laptop-repair.jpg
547 ms
desktop-repair.jpg
547 ms
mac-repair.jpg
555 ms
phone-repair-mb.jpg
629 ms
slider-31.jpg
652 ms
hourly-rate-e1552335799271-300x300.png
647 ms
os-install-300x300.jpg
650 ms
pc-mechanic-icon-300x300.png
676 ms
remote-support-300x300.jpg
763 ms
Diagnostic-fee-300x300.jpg
761 ms
desktop-repairs.jpg
805 ms
macbook-imac-repair.jpg
805 ms
laptop-mac.jpg
714 ms
data.jpg
730 ms
tablet-300x300.png
795 ms
monitor.png
785 ms
z7NFdQDnbTkabZAIOl9il_O6KJj73e7Ff1GhPuI.ttf
31 ms
z7NFdQDnbTkabZAIOl9il_O6KJj73e7Ff0GmPuI.ttf
31 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
993 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
871 ms
recaptcha__en.js
28 ms
loader.gif
381 ms
64-bit.co.uk
2371 ms
woocommerce-smallscreen.css
115 ms
64-bit.co.uk accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.
64-bit.co.uk best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
64-bit.co.uk SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise 64-bit.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that 64-bit.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
64-bit.co.uk
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of 64 Bit. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: