Tools & Wizards About Us
job.6665.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 29

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    49% of other websites

  • 81

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 52% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    75% of websites

Page Load Speed

51.6 sec in total

First Response

10.8 sec

Resources Loaded

39.8 sec

Page Rendered

1 sec

job.6665.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to job.6665.com homepage info - get ready to check Job 6665 best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about job.6665.com

Visit job.6665.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Job.6665.com page load time and found that the first response time was 10.8 sec and then it took 40.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only a small number of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

job.6665.com performance score

29

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value8.7 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value9.1 s

1/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value16.3 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value730 ms

40/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.024

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.9 s

13/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

job.6665.com

10762 ms

style_14_common.css

14384 ms

style_14_portal_list.css

1115 ms

common.js

4518 ms

portal.js

4431 ms

Our browser made a total of 58 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 19% of them (11 requests) were addressed to the original Job.6665.com, 62% (36 requests) were made to Shtimg.com and 10% (6 requests) were made to 6665.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (19.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Job.6665.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 244.4 kB (44%)

Content Size

558.6 kB

After Optimization

314.2 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Job.6665.com main page is 558.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 302.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 51.5 kB

  • Original 66.0 kB
  • After minification 61.5 kB
  • After compression 14.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 51.5 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-16%

Potential reduce by 47.8 kB

  • Original 302.8 kB
  • After minification 255.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Job 6665 needs image optimization as it can save up to 47.8 kB or 16% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-73%

Potential reduce by 58.8 kB

  • Original 80.8 kB
  • After minification 67.3 kB
  • After compression 22.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 58.8 kB or 73% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 86.4 kB

  • Original 109.0 kB
  • After minification 106.6 kB
  • After compression 22.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Job.6665.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 86.4 kB or 79% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

57

After Optimization

57

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 57 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Job 6665. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

job.6665.com

job.6665.com

10762 ms

style_14_common.css

style_14_common.css

14384 ms

style_14_portal_list.css

style_14_portal_list.css

1115 ms

common.js

common.js

4518 ms

portal.js

portal.js

4431 ms

job.css

job.css

2389 ms

discuz_tips.js

discuz_tips.js

471 ms

comiis_topbg.jpg

comiis_topbg.jpg

1141 ms

bg_job.png

bg_job.png

475 ms

165342i3z93475q71h9381.jpg

165342i3z93475q71h9381.jpg

13087 ms

102322pzww5gwd4b0uwvbw.jpg

102322pzww5gwd4b0uwvbw.jpg

1308 ms

1551472a6o16ooly6lo762.jpg

1551472a6o16ooly6lo762.jpg

1415 ms

155208ac45429369a4x5gg.png

155208ac45429369a4x5gg.png

3374 ms

155347gv5p405hpqykwx7w.png

155347gv5p405hpqykwx7w.png

1440 ms

155405g22qqzngnazz31vn.png

155405g22qqzngnazz31vn.png

1701 ms

155556h5m990aa1l5mz90a.jpg

155556h5m990aa1l5mz90a.jpg

3802 ms

1557250qkka99acjn9rc86.jpg

1557250qkka99acjn9rc86.jpg

1929 ms

1557449v3ao6ojc97n0oje.jpg

1557449v3ao6ojc97n0oje.jpg

2092 ms

155759dq6odq9dojqk8qne.jpg

155759dq6odq9dojqk8qne.jpg

4562 ms

155821snwifin32yfiq66h.gif

155821snwifin32yfiq66h.gif

2876 ms

155842fodrdpoanr9iri9a.gif

155842fodrdpoanr9iri9a.gif

2481 ms

155857yl1mplfv8vzfpj4l.gif

155857yl1mplfv8vzfpj4l.gif

3109 ms

155916zce5uou69dnuh79d.jpg

155916zce5uou69dnuh79d.jpg

4789 ms

1559355qsq8qqq2tjjq8hs.gif

1559355qsq8qqq2tjjq8hs.gif

3525 ms

160000pezcqkw7y6xwekxq.gif

160000pezcqkw7y6xwekxq.gif

4801 ms

154338dcf6f66fy5fyy61g.jpg

154338dcf6f66fy5fyy61g.jpg

5483 ms

162428vbdc4dvxkdlpbx1b.jpg

162428vbdc4dvxkdlpbx1b.jpg

5856 ms

134524cut78064ta16m4g3.gif

134524cut78064ta16m4g3.gif

5519 ms

134544jy4rsulzv1xy10xs.jpg

134544jy4rsulzv1xy10xs.jpg

6698 ms

114950kdw2au46uat64otj.png

114950kdw2au46uat64otj.png

6842 ms

134621awwz5cz48ayn541w.png

134621awwz5cz48ayn541w.png

6350 ms

134640ttcdsnxkr0qs57qx.png

134640ttcdsnxkr0qs57qx.png

7136 ms

13465754xrsxkz7s9ej6e4.jpg

13465754xrsxkz7s9ej6e4.jpg

13039 ms

134713t9qpugff7xfc777u.png

134713t9qpugff7xfc777u.png

6745 ms

134731xqlexllhblh2cx5l.gif

134731xqlexllhblh2cx5l.gif

7198 ms

160936kdcko1oxcxybzyyw.png

160936kdcko1oxcxybzyyw.png

7991 ms

161006tgsgzyzqj8frmrcm.png

161006tgsgzyzqj8frmrcm.png

8750 ms

161024pvp7gu80p25opu8k.gif

161024pvp7gu80p25opu8k.gif

8087 ms

1610489p3jg9p7lm9iini3.jpg

1610489p3jg9p7lm9iini3.jpg

11933 ms

161106qzyr7hfllkf2afbf.gif

161106qzyr7hfllkf2afbf.gif

8426 ms

1623303zdooq0ww0dh60vo.jpg

1623303zdooq0ww0dh60vo.jpg

11090 ms

160205mb1azzbmazz7sbzc.jpg

160205mb1azzbmazz7sbzc.jpg

8831 ms

160226ery1n8rxecee8zob.jpg

160226ery1n8rxecee8zob.jpg

10226 ms

160247gug8dukudlzsu9nu.jpg

160247gug8dukudlzsu9nu.jpg

9248 ms

1603031mwiikn5w0nco1wn.jpg

1603031mwiikn5w0nco1wn.jpg

13335 ms

arrwd.gif

arrwd.gif

1134 ms

comiis_topico.gif

comiis_topico.gif

1451 ms

px.png

px.png

1606 ms

pn.png

pn.png

1850 ms

mini_logo.png

mini_logo.png

3408 ms

qzzp.jpg

qzzp.jpg

7391 ms

1.jpg

1.jpg

19318 ms

3.jpg

3.jpg

6595 ms

2.jpg

2.jpg

2054 ms

4.jpg

4.jpg

4727 ms

picp_bg.png

picp_bg.png

10881 ms

wfbl.jpg

wfbl.jpg

14969 ms

scrolltop.png

scrolltop.png

1900 ms

Accessibility Review

job.6665.com accessibility score

81

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

job.6665.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

job.6665.com SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    GBK

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Job.6665.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Job.6665.com main page’s claimed encoding is gbk. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

job.6665.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Job 6665. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: