Tools & Wizards About Us
8052.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 0

    SEO

8052.com

Page Load Speed

491 ms in total

First Response

103 ms

Resources Loaded

240 ms

Page Rendered

148 ms

8052.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to 8052.com homepage info - get ready to check 8052 best content for India right away, or after learning these important things about 8052.com

8051/8052 Microcontrollers

Visit 8052.com

Key Findings

We analyzed 8052.com page load time and found that the first response time was 103 ms and then it took 388 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only 5% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

8052.com performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

8052.com

103 ms

8052com.js

44 ms

html2xhtml.js

45 ms

richtext_compressed.js

64 ms

8052com.css

46 ms

Our browser made a total of 13 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 85% of them (11 requests) were addressed to the original 8052.com, 15% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (103 ms) belongs to the original domain 8052.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 67.0 kB (65%)

Content Size

103.2 kB

After Optimization

36.2 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of 8052.com main page is 103.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 10% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 82.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-68%

Potential reduce by 5.6 kB

  • Original 8.2 kB
  • After minification 6.6 kB
  • After compression 2.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 1.7 kB, which is 20% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 5.6 kB or 68% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 16 B

  • Original 424 B
  • After minification 408 B

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. 8052 images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-62%

Potential reduce by 51.1 kB

  • Original 82.4 kB
  • After minification 81.7 kB
  • After compression 31.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 51.1 kB or 62% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 10.2 kB

  • Original 12.1 kB
  • After minification 7.2 kB
  • After compression 1.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. 8052.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 10.2 kB or 85% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 8 (67%)

Requests Now

12

After Optimization

4

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 12 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of 8052. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

8052.com

8052.com

103 ms

8052com.js

8052com.js

44 ms

html2xhtml.js

html2xhtml.js

45 ms

richtext_compressed.js

richtext_compressed.js

64 ms

8052com.css

8052com.css

46 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

21 ms

background4.png

background4.png

49 ms

background4-2.png

background4-2.png

49 ms

8052logo2.gif

8052logo2.gif

49 ms

background4-1.gif

background4-1.gif

50 ms

glossyback21.png

glossyback21.png

49 ms

downarrow.gif

downarrow.gif

50 ms

collect

collect

12 ms

SEO Factors

8052.com SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise 8052.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that 8052.com main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

8052.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of 8052. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: