Report Summary

  • 20

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    37% of other websites

  • 70

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 35% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    70% of websites

aanjal.de

Aanjal | Indisches Restaurant, Cáfe & Cocktail Bar

Page Load Speed

11.8 sec in total

First Response

14 ms

Resources Loaded

10.6 sec

Page Rendered

1.2 sec

aanjal.de screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Aanjal content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about aanjal.de

Created with Fabric.js 5.2.4 Bhatura Bhatura Bhatura Bhatura Bhatura Created with Fabric.js 5.2.4 Brote und Beilagen 12Products Created with Fabric.js 5.2.4 Reis Reis Reis Reis Reis Created with Fabri...

Visit aanjal.de

Key Findings

We analyzed Aanjal.de page load time and found that the first response time was 14 ms and then it took 11.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

aanjal.de performance score

20

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.8 s

5/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value21.0 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value23.1 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,410 ms

16/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.023

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value23.1 s

1/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

aanjal.de

14 ms

www.aanjal.de

27 ms

www.aanjal.com

2888 ms

css

51 ms

global.css

35 ms

Our browser made a total of 209 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Aanjal.de, 87% (181 requests) were made to Aanjal.com and 6% (13 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (7 sec) relates to the external source Aanjal.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 2.4 MB (29%)

Content Size

8.4 MB

After Optimization

6.0 MB

In fact, the total size of Aanjal.de main page is 8.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 6.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 383.4 kB

  • Original 483.8 kB
  • After minification 454.1 kB
  • After compression 100.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 383.4 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-22%

Potential reduce by 1.4 MB

  • Original 6.5 MB
  • After minification 5.1 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Aanjal needs image optimization as it can save up to 1.4 MB or 22% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-43%

Potential reduce by 441.8 kB

  • Original 1.0 MB
  • After minification 1.0 MB
  • After compression 594.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 441.8 kB or 43% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-49%

Potential reduce by 213.6 kB

  • Original 433.4 kB
  • After minification 407.0 kB
  • After compression 219.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Aanjal.de needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 213.6 kB or 49% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 143 (75%)

Requests Now

191

After Optimization

48

The browser has sent 191 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Aanjal. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 85 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 60 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

aanjal.de accessibility score

70

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

aanjal.de best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

aanjal.de SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    DE

  • Language Claimed

    DE

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Aanjal.de can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Aanjal.de main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Aanjal. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: