Tools & Wizards About Us
ablescreening.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 27

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    46% of other websites

  • 98

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 94% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

ablescreening.com

Able Screening | credit reporting | 1728 Union St, San Francisco, CA 94123, United States

Page Load Speed

1.1 sec in total

First Response

77 ms

Resources Loaded

960 ms

Page Rendered

56 ms

ablescreening.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to ablescreening.com homepage info - get ready to check Able Screening best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about ablescreening.com

Discover Able Screening Service LLC, the leading credit reporting screening provider with over 43 years of industry expertise. Our fast, reliable, and compliant solutions ensure accurate background ch...

Visit ablescreening.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Ablescreening.com page load time and found that the first response time was 77 ms and then it took 1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

ablescreening.com performance score

27

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.7 s

28/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value17.9 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.1 s

14/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,120 ms

23/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.029

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value16.9 s

5/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.ablescreening.com

77 ms

minified.js

37 ms

focus-within-polyfill.js

65 ms

polyfill.min.js

34 ms

mobile-app-invite-banner.css

75 ms

Our browser made a total of 54 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Ablescreening.com, 37% (20 requests) were made to Static.parastorage.com and 33% (18 requests) were made to Static.wixstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (598 ms) relates to the external source Static.wixstatic.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 820.1 kB (64%)

Content Size

1.3 MB

After Optimization

461.1 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Ablescreening.com main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 933.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 766.2 kB

  • Original 933.3 kB
  • After minification 931.5 kB
  • After compression 167.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 766.2 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 10.8 kB
  • After minification 10.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Able Screening images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-16%

Potential reduce by 53.8 kB

  • Original 335.7 kB
  • After minification 335.7 kB
  • After compression 281.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 53.8 kB or 16% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 56 B

  • Original 1.4 kB
  • After minification 1.4 kB
  • After compression 1.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ablescreening.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 19 (54%)

Requests Now

35

After Optimization

16

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 35 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Able Screening. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.ablescreening.com

www.ablescreening.com

77 ms

minified.js

minified.js

37 ms

focus-within-polyfill.js

focus-within-polyfill.js

65 ms

polyfill.min.js

polyfill.min.js

34 ms

mobile-app-invite-banner.css

mobile-app-invite-banner.css

75 ms

mobile-app-invite-banner.umd.min.js

mobile-app-invite-banner.umd.min.js

152 ms

thunderbolt-commons.8add2233.bundle.min.js

thunderbolt-commons.8add2233.bundle.min.js

141 ms

main.1550a9c2.bundle.min.js

main.1550a9c2.bundle.min.js

139 ms

main.renderer.1d21f023.bundle.min.js

main.renderer.1d21f023.bundle.min.js

138 ms

lodash.min.js

lodash.min.js

142 ms

react.production.min.js

react.production.min.js

139 ms

react-dom.production.min.js

react-dom.production.min.js

141 ms

siteTags.bundle.min.js

siteTags.bundle.min.js

152 ms

34db94_6b920682fd1044e1824a95d0dcc4d831~mv2.webp

34db94_6b920682fd1044e1824a95d0dcc4d831~mv2.webp

98 ms

bundle.min.js

bundle.min.js

83 ms

8152a9faeae540be855470549fa5394e.jpg

8152a9faeae540be855470549fa5394e.jpg

209 ms

Housing%20Development.jpg

Housing%20Development.jpg

157 ms

Office%20service.jpeg

Office%20service.jpeg

228 ms

Financial%20Report.jpg

Financial%20Report.jpg

157 ms

Driving%20Test%20Report.jpg

Driving%20Test%20Report.jpg

156 ms

Building.jpg

Building.jpg

157 ms

partner_coldwell.webp

partner_coldwell.webp

384 ms

partner_compass.webp

partner_compass.webp

431 ms

partner_vanguard.webp

partner_vanguard.webp

298 ms

partner_relisto.webp

partner_relisto.webp

313 ms

partner_rentals.webp

partner_rentals.webp

395 ms

partner_berendt-properties.webp

partner_berendt-properties.webp

375 ms

partner_foundation-properties.webp

partner_foundation-properties.webp

473 ms

partner_jwavro.webp

partner_jwavro.webp

491 ms

partner_golden-gate.webp

partner_golden-gate.webp

516 ms

partner_corcoran.webp

partner_corcoran.webp

587 ms

34db94_6b920682fd1044e1824a95d0dcc4d831~mv2.webp

34db94_6b920682fd1044e1824a95d0dcc4d831~mv2.webp

598 ms

147 ms

146 ms

146 ms

144 ms

141 ms

142 ms

175 ms

174 ms

169 ms

173 ms

168 ms

166 ms

03805817-4611-4dbc-8c65-0f73031c3973.woff

03805817-4611-4dbc-8c65-0f73031c3973.woff

10 ms

80c34ad2-27c2-4d99-90fa-985fd64ab81a.woff

80c34ad2-27c2-4d99-90fa-985fd64ab81a.woff

23 ms

-HJgNsTwx9qXGSxqew62RQ.woff

-HJgNsTwx9qXGSxqew62RQ.woff

23 ms

51v0xj5VPw1cLYHNhfd8ND8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff

51v0xj5VPw1cLYHNhfd8ND8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff

23 ms

908c4810-64db-4b46-bb8e-823eb41f68c0.woff

908c4810-64db-4b46-bb8e-823eb41f68c0.woff

23 ms

AvenirLTW05-35Light.woff

AvenirLTW05-35Light.woff

23 ms

deprecation-en.v5.html

deprecation-en.v5.html

5 ms

bolt-performance

bolt-performance

22 ms

deprecation-style.v5.css

deprecation-style.v5.css

6 ms

right-arrow.svg

right-arrow.svg

6 ms

Accessibility Review

ablescreening.com accessibility score

98

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

ablescreening.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

ablescreening.com SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ablescreening.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ablescreening.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

ablescreening.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Able Screening. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: