Tools & Wizards About Us
abrasiverock.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 0

    SEO

abrasiverock.com

Organizational Chart Of Airline Industry

Page Load Speed

4.2 sec in total

First Response

224 ms

Resources Loaded

3.9 sec

Page Rendered

93 ms

abrasiverock.com screenshot

About Website

Visit abrasiverock.com now to see the best up-to-date Abrasiverock content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about abrasiverock.com

Airline organization structure depends on the size of the airline and whether it's a publicly-traded company. Those that sell shares of stock all feature common organizational characteristics.

Visit abrasiverock.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Abrasiverock.com page load time and found that the first response time was 224 ms and then it took 4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

abrasiverock.com performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

abrasiverock.com

224 ms

style.css

183 ms

slot-pokerpoker-online-no.js

357 ms

spacer.gif

194 ms

1txt1.jpg

184 ms

Our browser made a total of 17 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 88% of them (15 requests) were addressed to the original Abrasiverock.com, 12% (2 requests) were made to Regional-targeting.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Abrasiverock.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 27.8 kB (25%)

Content Size

112.4 kB

After Optimization

84.5 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Abrasiverock.com main page is 112.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 5% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 78.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-70%

Potential reduce by 6.4 kB

  • Original 9.2 kB
  • After minification 8.6 kB
  • After compression 2.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 6.4 kB or 70% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 2.8 kB

  • Original 78.3 kB
  • After minification 75.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Abrasiverock images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-75%

Potential reduce by 18.2 kB

  • Original 24.3 kB
  • After minification 19.5 kB
  • After compression 6.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 18.2 kB or 75% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-60%

Potential reduce by 336 B

  • Original 558 B
  • After minification 453 B
  • After compression 222 B

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Abrasiverock.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 336 B or 60% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 6 (38%)

Requests Now

16

After Optimization

10

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 16 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Abrasiverock. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

abrasiverock.com

abrasiverock.com

224 ms

style.css

style.css

183 ms

slot-pokerpoker-online-no.js

slot-pokerpoker-online-no.js

357 ms

spacer.gif

spacer.gif

194 ms

1txt1.jpg

1txt1.jpg

184 ms

1im1.jpg

1im1.jpg

665 ms

1txt2.jpg

1txt2.jpg

186 ms

post-77-1108971437_thumb.jpg

post-77-1108971437_thumb.jpg

681 ms

1txt3.jpg

1txt3.jpg

1656 ms

1txt4.jpg

1txt4.jpg

1655 ms

1im2.jpg

1im2.jpg

2658 ms

1im3.jpg

1im3.jpg

2698 ms

td1.jpg

td1.jpg

2480 ms

dot.jpg

dot.jpg

2481 ms

td2.jpg

td2.jpg

3485 ms

urchin.js

urchin.js

770 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

153 ms

SEO Factors

abrasiverock.com SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Abrasiverock.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Abrasiverock.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

abrasiverock.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Abrasiverock. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: