Tools & Wizards About Us
accept.blue screenshot

Report Summary

  • 37

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    58% of other websites

  • 98

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 95% of websites

  • 77

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    84% of websites

accept.blue

Accept Blue | Celebrity Payment Software | White Label Payment Gateway

Page Load Speed

6.4 sec in total

First Response

193 ms

Resources Loaded

5.4 sec

Page Rendered

816 ms

accept.blue screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Accept content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about accept.blue

Streamline processing and increase revenues with our next-gen payment gateway. Our processor-agnostic white label Accept Blue platform provides rapid integrations, built-in multilevel interchange opti...

Visit accept.blue

Key Findings

We analyzed Accept.blue page load time and found that the first response time was 193 ms and then it took 6.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

accept.blue performance score

37

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.2 s

78/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.5 s

2/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.2 s

43/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,230 ms

20/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.023

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.6 s

37/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

accept.blue

193 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

87 ms

style.min.css

91 ms

styles.css

247 ms

et-divi-builder-dynamic-9.css

389 ms

Our browser made a total of 56 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 95% of them (53 requests) were addressed to the original Accept.blue, 2% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3 sec) relates to the external source Gstatic.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 239.9 kB (31%)

Content Size

778.0 kB

After Optimization

538.2 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Accept.blue main page is 778.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 520.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-88%

Potential reduce by 226.2 kB

  • Original 257.4 kB
  • After minification 215.2 kB
  • After compression 31.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 42.2 kB, which is 16% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 226.2 kB or 88% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 13.7 kB

  • Original 520.1 kB
  • After minification 506.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Accept images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-9%

Potential reduce by 52 B

  • Original 603 B
  • After minification 603 B
  • After compression 551 B

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 33 (63%)

Requests Now

52

After Optimization

19

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 52 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Accept. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 21 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 14 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

accept.blue

accept.blue

193 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

87 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

91 ms

styles.css

styles.css

247 ms

et-divi-builder-dynamic-9.css

et-divi-builder-dynamic-9.css

389 ms

normalize.min.css

normalize.min.css

96 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

281 ms

slides.min.css

slides.min.css

177 ms

slick-theme.min.css

slick-theme.min.css

129 ms

slick.min.css

slick.min.css

142 ms

main.css

main.css

198 ms

select.min.css

select.min.css

259 ms

blog.css

blog.css

316 ms

main-responsive.css

main-responsive.css

301 ms

Glyphter.min.css

Glyphter.min.css

328 ms

active-styles.css

active-styles.css

317 ms

js

js

78 ms

index.js

index.js

343 ms

index.js

index.js

357 ms

jquery-2.2.4.min.js

jquery-2.2.4.min.js

868 ms

scripts.min.js

scripts.min.js

868 ms

common.js

common.js

868 ms

api.js

api.js

85 ms

regenerator-runtime.min.js

regenerator-runtime.min.js

872 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

868 ms

index.js

index.js

874 ms

lazyload.min.js

lazyload.min.js

873 ms

forms_select.min.js

forms_select.min.js

868 ms

mouse.min.js

mouse.min.js

871 ms

slides.min.js

slides.min.js

875 ms

slider-plugins.min.js

slider-plugins.min.js

876 ms

slick.min.js

slick.min.js

879 ms

plugins.min.js

plugins.min.js

876 ms

main.min.js

main.min.js

877 ms

animation-events.js

animation-events.js

877 ms

home_slide_1_bg.png

home_slide_1_bg.png

175 ms

home_slide_3_bg.png

home_slide_3_bg.png

175 ms

home_slide_4_bg.png

home_slide_4_bg.png

171 ms

home_slide_5_bg.png

home_slide_5_bg.png

171 ms

home_slide_6_bg.png

home_slide_6_bg.png

231 ms

home_slide_7_bg.png

home_slide_7_bg.png

175 ms

logo.jpg

logo.jpg

176 ms

logo-2.jpg

logo-2.jpg

177 ms

logo-3.jpg

logo-3.jpg

228 ms

logo-4.jpg

logo-4.jpg

231 ms

logo.png

logo.png

267 ms

pci-white.png

pci-white.png

238 ms

ServiceProviderBadge%20(1).png

ServiceProviderBadge%20(1).png

286 ms

BrandonGrotesque-Medium.woff

BrandonGrotesque-Medium.woff

1016 ms

Glyphter.woff

Glyphter.woff

1015 ms

BrandonGrotesque-Regular.woff

BrandonGrotesque-Regular.woff

1015 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

3006 ms

logo.svg

logo.svg

1917 ms

logo_blue.svg

logo_blue.svg

515 ms

logo_mob.svg

logo_mob.svg

450 ms

home-section-1.svg

home-section-1.svg

447 ms

Accessibility Review

accept.blue accessibility score

98

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

accept.blue best practices score

77

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

accept.blue SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't use legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Accept.blue can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Accept.blue main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

accept.blue

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Accept. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: