2.1 sec in total
196 ms
1.7 sec
232 ms
Visit accet.org now to see the best up-to-date ACCET content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about accet.org
Visit accet.orgWe analyzed Accet.org page load time and found that the first response time was 196 ms and then it took 1.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.
accet.org performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.7 s
30/100
10%
Value3.7 s
59/100
25%
Value4.6 s
71/100
10%
Value380 ms
70/100
30%
Value0.022
100/100
15%
Value5.4 s
71/100
10%
196 ms
70 ms
138 ms
139 ms
141 ms
Our browser made a total of 114 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 84% of them (96 requests) were addressed to the original Accet.org, 4% (5 requests) were made to Apis.google.com and 4% (4 requests) were made to Calendar.google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (750 ms) belongs to the original domain Accet.org.
Page size can be reduced by 999.1 kB (18%)
5.5 MB
4.5 MB
In fact, the total size of Accet.org main page is 5.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 85% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 4.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 97.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 97.1 kB or 89% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 133.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. ACCET images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 544.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 544.1 kB or 69% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 224.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Accet.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 224.6 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 52 (47%)
111
59
The browser has sent 111 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of ACCET. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 33 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 16 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
accet.org
196 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
70 ms
styles.css
138 ms
themeroller-base.css
139 ms
style.css
141 ms
settings.css
142 ms
dynamic-captions.css
145 ms
wp-style.css
144 ms
style.css
273 ms
style.css
210 ms
font-awesome.min.css
208 ms
jquery.fancybox.css
211 ms
flexslider.css
211 ms
style-responsive.css
212 ms
style-custom13.css
275 ms
superfish.css
278 ms
component.css
279 ms
jquery.js
347 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
284 ms
jquery.themepunch.plugins.min.js
408 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
425 ms
jquery.tablesorter.min.js
344 ms
jquery.metadata.js
370 ms
wp-script.js
371 ms
jquery.form.min.js
447 ms
scripts.js
450 ms
jquery.pajinate.min.js
448 ms
pagination.js
451 ms
jquery.easing.js
521 ms
jquery.fancybox.pack.js
522 ms
jquery.fancybox-media.js
524 ms
jquery.fancybox-thumbs.js
524 ms
jquery.flexslider.js
525 ms
jquery.isotope.min.js
526 ms
gdlr-script.js
547 ms
superfish.js
547 ms
hoverIntent.min.js
547 ms
modernizr.custom.js
494 ms
jquery.dlmenu.js
429 ms
wp-embed.min.js
428 ms
analytics.js
40 ms
header1.jpg
558 ms
hero.jpg
558 ms
1.jpg
559 ms
2.jpg
564 ms
3.jpg
560 ms
4.jpg
561 ms
5.jpg
559 ms
6.jpg
561 ms
7.jpg
568 ms
8.jpg
565 ms
9.jpg
562 ms
10.jpg
563 ms
11.jpg
565 ms
12.jpg
567 ms
13.jpg
653 ms
14.jpg
586 ms
15.jpg
644 ms
16.jpg
585 ms
17.jpg
730 ms
18.jpg
649 ms
19.jpg
648 ms
20.jpg
648 ms
21.jpg
725 ms
22.jpg
711 ms
embed
512 ms
linkid.js
44 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
654 ms
23.jpg
652 ms
24.jpg
652 ms
25.jpg
701 ms
26.jpg
706 ms
27.jpg
706 ms
28.jpg
686 ms
29.jpg
688 ms
30.jpg
687 ms
31.jpg
744 ms
32.jpg
750 ms
embed
122 ms
33.jpg
309 ms
34.jpg
310 ms
35.jpg
311 ms
36.jpg
309 ms
37.jpg
369 ms
38.jpg
377 ms
40.jpg
376 ms
41.jpg
375 ms
42.jpg
375 ms
43.jpg
375 ms
44.jpg
427 ms
45.jpg
436 ms
46.jpg
434 ms
47.jpg
434 ms
collect
11 ms
collect
52 ms
48.jpg
422 ms
49.jpg
416 ms
wvlportrait.jpg
472 ms
timer.png
423 ms
loader.gif
417 ms
small_left.png
418 ms
small_right.png
418 ms
979b49df4ebf2506acdc41045b4c0329embedcompiled_fastui.css
13 ms
979b49df4ebf2506acdc41045b4c0329embedcompiled__en.js
42 ms
client.js
80 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
41 ms
postmessageRelay
37 ms
3193398744-postmessagerelay.js
48 ms
rpc:shindig_random.js
32 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
13 ms
logo-plus.png
21 ms
googlelogo_color_46x16dp.png
52 ms
proxy.html
54 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
11 ms
accet.org accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
accet.org best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
accet.org SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Accet.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Accet.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
accet.org
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of ACCET. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: