Tools & Wizards About Us
ace-eng.co.uk screenshot

Report Summary

  • 51

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    69% of other websites

  • 95

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 86% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    70% of websites

ace-eng.co.uk

Anglia CNC

Page Load Speed

2.1 sec in total

First Response

67 ms

Resources Loaded

573 ms

Page Rendered

1.4 sec

ace-eng.co.uk screenshot

About Website

Visit ace-eng.co.uk now to see the best up-to-date Ace Eng content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about ace-eng.co.uk

Welcome to Anglia CNC Engineering Ltd. About In addition to the experience gained since 1973 in supplying the electronic, scientific, optical, laser, medical, motor sport, commercial aerospace, printi...

Visit ace-eng.co.uk

Key Findings

We analyzed Ace-eng.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 67 ms and then it took 2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

ace-eng.co.uk performance score

51

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.0 s

49/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.0 s

77/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value11.5 s

5/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value420 ms

65/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.283

43/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value28.8 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

ace-eng.co.uk

67 ms

angliacnc.co.uk

50 ms

style.min.css

18 ms

latest.css

29 ms

live-site-control.css

44 ms

Our browser made a total of 108 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Ace-eng.co.uk, 90% (97 requests) were made to Angliacnc.co.uk and 6% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (237 ms) relates to the external source Angliacnc.co.uk.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 367.8 kB (4%)

Content Size

9.1 MB

After Optimization

8.7 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Ace-eng.co.uk main page is 9.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 7.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 120.6 kB

  • Original 155.1 kB
  • After minification 152.0 kB
  • After compression 34.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 120.6 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 158.9 kB

  • Original 7.8 MB
  • After minification 7.6 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Ace Eng images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-8%

Potential reduce by 87.7 kB

  • Original 1.1 MB
  • After minification 1.1 MB
  • After compression 988.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 603 B

  • Original 115.6 kB
  • After minification 115.6 kB
  • After compression 115.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ace-eng.co.uk has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 84 (84%)

Requests Now

100

After Optimization

16

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 100 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ace Eng. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 69 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 17 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

ace-eng.co.uk

ace-eng.co.uk

67 ms

angliacnc.co.uk

angliacnc.co.uk

50 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

18 ms

latest.css

latest.css

29 ms

live-site-control.css

live-site-control.css

44 ms

all.min.css

all.min.css

53 ms

simple-line-icons.min.css

simple-line-icons.min.css

31 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

35 ms

frontend-lite.min.css

frontend-lite.min.css

47 ms

swiper.min.css

swiper.min.css

57 ms

post-26.css

post-26.css

56 ms

frontend-lite.min.css

frontend-lite.min.css

58 ms

global.css

global.css

67 ms

post-10.css

post-10.css

64 ms

widgets.css

widgets.css

69 ms

css

css

43 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

65 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

85 ms

widget-carousel.min.css

widget-carousel.min.css

84 ms

widget-posts.min.css

widget-posts.min.css

101 ms

widget-icon-box.min.css

widget-icon-box.min.css

99 ms

coblocks-animation.js

coblocks-animation.js

107 ms

tiny-swiper.js

tiny-swiper.js

107 ms

coblocks-tinyswiper-initializer.js

coblocks-tinyswiper-initializer.js

108 ms

react.min.js

react.min.js

109 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

108 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

109 ms

url.min.js

url.min.js

110 ms

api-fetch.min.js

api-fetch.min.js

112 ms

react-dom.min.js

react-dom.min.js

112 ms

react-jsx-runtime.min.js

react-jsx-runtime.min.js

112 ms

dom-ready.min.js

dom-ready.min.js

113 ms

a11y.min.js

a11y.min.js

114 ms

deprecated.min.js

deprecated.min.js

113 ms

dom.min.js

dom.min.js

119 ms

escape-html.min.js

escape-html.min.js

121 ms

element.min.js

element.min.js

127 ms

is-shallow-equal.min.js

is-shallow-equal.min.js

140 ms

keycodes.min.js

keycodes.min.js

129 ms

priority-queue.min.js

priority-queue.min.js

117 ms

compose.min.js

compose.min.js

112 ms

scc-c2.min.js

scc-c2.min.js

5 ms

moment.min.js

moment.min.js

122 ms

tti.min.js

tti.min.js

13 ms

date.min.js

date.min.js

114 ms

html-entities.min.js

html-entities.min.js

120 ms

primitives.min.js

primitives.min.js

108 ms

private-apis.min.js

private-apis.min.js

228 ms

redux-routine.min.js

redux-routine.min.js

103 ms

data.min.js

data.min.js

110 ms

rich-text.min.js

rich-text.min.js

119 ms

warning.min.js

warning.min.js

112 ms

components.min.js

components.min.js

112 ms

blob.min.js

blob.min.js

112 ms

autop.min.js

autop.min.js

108 ms

dc7a24f54fbd3a87ba8fb6eedecec5b6

dc7a24f54fbd3a87ba8fb6eedecec5b6

20 ms

block-serialization-default-parser.min.js

block-serialization-default-parser.min.js

93 ms

shortcode.min.js

shortcode.min.js

101 ms

blocks.min.js

blocks.min.js

85 ms

keyboard-shortcuts.min.js

keyboard-shortcuts.min.js

90 ms

commands.min.js

commands.min.js

99 ms

notices.min.js

notices.min.js

96 ms

preferences-persistence.min.js

preferences-persistence.min.js

97 ms

preferences.min.js

preferences.min.js

110 ms

style-engine.min.js

style-engine.min.js

105 ms

token-list.min.js

token-list.min.js

108 ms

wordcount.min.js

wordcount.min.js

110 ms

block-editor.min.js

block-editor.min.js

116 ms

core-data.min.js

core-data.min.js

123 ms

live-site-control.js

live-site-control.js

129 ms

imagesloaded.min.js

imagesloaded.min.js

177 ms

theme.min.js

theme.min.js

123 ms

drop-down-mobile-menu.min.js

drop-down-mobile-menu.min.js

162 ms

magnific-popup.min.js

magnific-popup.min.js

159 ms

ow-lightbox.min.js

ow-lightbox.min.js

157 ms

flickity.pkgd.min.js

flickity.pkgd.min.js

150 ms

ow-slider.min.js

ow-slider.min.js

165 ms

scroll-effect.min.js

scroll-effect.min.js

166 ms

scroll-top.min.js

scroll-top.min.js

154 ms

select.min.js

select.min.js

147 ms

flickr.min.js

flickr.min.js

151 ms

webpack-pro.runtime.min.js

webpack-pro.runtime.min.js

150 ms

webpack.runtime.min.js

webpack.runtime.min.js

150 ms

frontend-modules.min.js

frontend-modules.min.js

149 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

145 ms

waypoints.min.js

waypoints.min.js

144 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

136 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

134 ms

elements-handlers.min.js

elements-handlers.min.js

168 ms

cropped-ANGLIA-CNC-LOGO.jpg

cropped-ANGLIA-CNC-LOGO.jpg

135 ms

pixelcut_15.png

pixelcut_15.png

136 ms

pixelcut_17.png

pixelcut_17.png

126 ms

pixelcut_7.png

pixelcut_7.png

134 ms

pixelcut_2.png

pixelcut_2.png

169 ms

pixelcut_13.png

pixelcut_13.png

169 ms

pixelcut_3.png

pixelcut_3.png

162 ms

mfg-1.png

mfg-1.png

139 ms

VTC-800-20SR-Large-2-1.png

VTC-800-20SR-Large-2-1.png

158 ms

25A225F5-7D5C-49E8-B71B-87F9DF309B94.png

25A225F5-7D5C-49E8-B71B-87F9DF309B94.png

167 ms

B6A42549-4C10-4A26-BAD8-57A4156E17DB.png

B6A42549-4C10-4A26-BAD8-57A4156E17DB.png

151 ms

Black-9001-9100-A.png

Black-9001-9100-A.png

237 ms

mfg-2.png

mfg-2.png

162 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf

17 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf

24 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

35 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

42 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf

61 ms

KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxIIzc.ttf

KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxIIzc.ttf

61 ms

Accessibility Review

ace-eng.co.uk accessibility score

95

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

ace-eng.co.uk best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

ace-eng.co.uk SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ace-eng.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ace-eng.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

ace-eng.co.uk

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Ace Eng. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: