Report Summary

  • 23

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    42% of other websites

  • 66

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 31% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 80

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    42% of websites

acebeam.com

AceBeam® Official Store | Flashlights, Tactical Lights

Page Load Speed

1.5 sec in total

First Response

304 ms

Resources Loaded

922 ms

Page Rendered

314 ms

acebeam.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to acebeam.com homepage info - get ready to check Ace Beam best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about acebeam.com

AceBeam® dedicated to make high-quality flashlights for years, including EDC and tactical flashlights, headlamps, powerful flashlights.

Visit acebeam.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Acebeam.com page load time and found that the first response time was 304 ms and then it took 1.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

acebeam.com performance score

23

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.2 s

42/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.8 s

3/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.5 s

73/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,170 ms

21/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.497

16/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.8 s

22/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

acebeam.com

304 ms

jquery-ui-1.10.3.custom.min.css

68 ms

styles.css

159 ms

nivo-slider.css

73 ms

custom.css

76 ms

Our browser made a total of 29 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Acebeam.com and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (304 ms) belongs to the original domain Acebeam.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 472.4 kB (47%)

Content Size

1.0 MB

After Optimization

535.4 kB

In fact, the total size of Acebeam.com main page is 1.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 431.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 25.0 kB

  • Original 30.7 kB
  • After minification 24.2 kB
  • After compression 5.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 6.5 kB, which is 21% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 25.0 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-8%

Potential reduce by 33.9 kB

  • Original 431.8 kB
  • After minification 397.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Ace Beam images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-72%

Potential reduce by 280.8 kB

  • Original 389.7 kB
  • After minification 373.4 kB
  • After compression 109.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 280.8 kB or 72% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 132.7 kB

  • Original 155.5 kB
  • After minification 125.1 kB
  • After compression 22.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Acebeam.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 132.7 kB or 85% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 9 (32%)

Requests Now

28

After Optimization

19

The browser has sent 28 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ace Beam. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

acebeam.com accessibility score

66

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

acebeam.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

acebeam.com SEO score

80

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Acebeam.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Acebeam.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Ace Beam. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: