Tools & Wizards About Us
aceda.org screenshot

Report Summary

  • 82

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    87% of other websites

  • 86

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 62% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 75

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    32% of websites

aceda.org

Page Load Speed

4.7 sec in total

First Response

1.4 sec

Resources Loaded

2.8 sec

Page Rendered

525 ms

aceda.org screenshot

About Website

Welcome to aceda.org homepage info - get ready to check Aceda best content for Australia right away, or after learning these important things about aceda.org

Visit aceda.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Aceda.org page load time and found that the first response time was 1.4 sec and then it took 3.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

aceda.org performance score

82

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.3 s

41/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.7 s

59/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.3 s

91/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value30 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.007

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.9 s

89/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

aceda.org

1373 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

130 ms

shortcodes.css

226 ms

layerslider.css

199 ms

css

33 ms

Our browser made a total of 60 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 65% of them (39 requests) were addressed to the original Aceda.org, 7% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 7% (4 requests) were made to I1.wp.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Aceda.org.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.0 MB (45%)

Content Size

2.3 MB

After Optimization

1.2 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Aceda.org main page is 2.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 854.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 46.4 kB

  • Original 59.4 kB
  • After minification 59.1 kB
  • After compression 13.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 46.4 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 1.8 kB

  • Original 854.4 kB
  • After minification 852.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Aceda images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-68%

Potential reduce by 566.4 kB

  • Original 827.4 kB
  • After minification 794.0 kB
  • After compression 261.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 566.4 kB or 68% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 407.1 kB

  • Original 512.1 kB
  • After minification 437.4 kB
  • After compression 105.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Aceda.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 407.1 kB or 79% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 44 (75%)

Requests Now

59

After Optimization

15

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 59 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Aceda. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 29 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 17 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

aceda.org

aceda.org

1373 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

130 ms

shortcodes.css

shortcodes.css

226 ms

layerslider.css

layerslider.css

199 ms

css

css

33 ms

animate.css

animate.css

139 ms

frontend.css

frontend.css

165 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

11 ms

css

css

50 ms

frontend.css

frontend.css

155 ms

styles.css

styles.css

232 ms

settings.css

settings.css

212 ms

normalize.css

normalize.css

235 ms

style.css

style.css

234 ms

css

css

64 ms

css

css

64 ms

jetpack.css

jetpack.css

329 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

364 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

280 ms

html5.js

html5.js

385 ms

greensock.js

greensock.js

385 ms

layerslider.kreaturamedia.jquery.js

layerslider.kreaturamedia.jquery.js

385 ms

layerslider.transitions.js

layerslider.transitions.js

343 ms

frontend.js

frontend.js

420 ms

jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js

jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js

430 ms

jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js

jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js

494 ms

modernizr-2.6.2.min.js

modernizr-2.6.2.min.js

470 ms

load.sumome.com

load.sumome.com

316 ms

js

js

102 ms

eightdegree-shortcodes-plugins.js

eightdegree-shortcodes-plugins.js

645 ms

eightdegree-shortcodes-script.js

eightdegree-shortcodes-script.js

462 ms

photon.js

photon.js

466 ms

frontend.js

frontend.js

480 ms

jquery.form.min.js

jquery.form.min.js

569 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

571 ms

devicepx-jetpack.js

devicepx-jetpack.js

14 ms

gprofiles.js

gprofiles.js

59 ms

wpgroho.js

wpgroho.js

584 ms

plugins.js

plugins.js

564 ms

script.js

script.js

565 ms

comment-reply.min.js

comment-reply.min.js

603 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

608 ms

e-201611.js

e-201611.js

8 ms

Harbour.jpg

Harbour.jpg

717 ms

ACEDA_Main.png

ACEDA_Main.png

515 ms

aceda_small.png

aceda_small.png

308 ms

next.png

next.png

307 ms

prev.png

prev.png

309 ms

shutterstock_211539547.jpg

shutterstock_211539547.jpg

880 ms

up.png

up.png

307 ms

waxseal.png

waxseal.png

585 ms

640.jpg

640.jpg

482 ms

waxseal.png

waxseal.png

475 ms

hovercard.css

hovercard.css

58 ms

services.css

services.css

83 ms

306 ms

ajax-loader.gif

ajax-loader.gif

146 ms

g.gif

g.gif

3 ms

service.js

service.js

13 ms

service.js

service.js

56 ms

Accessibility Review

aceda.org accessibility score

86

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't have a <title> element

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Best Practices

aceda.org best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

aceda.org SEO score

75

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't have a <title> element

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Page is blocked from indexing

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Aceda.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Aceda.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

aceda.org

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Aceda. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: