Tools & Wizards About Us
acmedata.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 57

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    73% of other websites

  • 73

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 38% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

acmedata.net

Acme Data - Home Page

Page Load Speed

2.8 sec in total

First Response

393 ms

Resources Loaded

1.8 sec

Page Rendered

541 ms

acmedata.net screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Acme Data content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about acmedata.net

Visit acmedata.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Acmedata.net page load time and found that the first response time was 393 ms and then it took 2.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

acmedata.net performance score

57

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.9 s

11/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.2 s

2/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.7 s

25/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value4.9 s

78/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.acmedata.net

393 ms

lazyload.min.js

59 ms

logo.svg

223 ms

sky1.png

429 ms

Bullet2.png

226 ms

Our browser made a total of 31 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 68% of them (21 requests) were addressed to the original Acmedata.net, 32% (10 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (490 ms) belongs to the original domain Acmedata.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 307.7 kB (33%)

Content Size

933.4 kB

After Optimization

625.7 kB

  • HTML
  • Images

In fact, the total size of Acmedata.net main page is 933.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 573.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 307.7 kB

  • Original 359.8 kB
  • After minification 355.3 kB
  • After compression 52.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 307.7 kB or 86% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 56 B

  • Original 573.6 kB
  • After minification 573.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Acme Data images are well optimized though.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

20

After Optimization

20

  • Images
  • JavaScript

The browser has sent 20 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Acme Data. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

www.acmedata.net

www.acmedata.net

393 ms

lazyload.min.js

lazyload.min.js

59 ms

logo.svg

logo.svg

223 ms

sky1.png

sky1.png

429 ms

Bullet2.png

Bullet2.png

226 ms

magnifying%20glass.png

magnifying%20glass.png

223 ms

skyblue-nh1.png

skyblue-nh1.png

426 ms

tornado-transparent-background-1-1.png

tornado-transparent-background-1-1.png

131 ms

servicemax-logo.png

servicemax-logo.png

183 ms

salesforce-logo.png

salesforce-logo.png

220 ms

oracles-logo.png

oracles-logo.png

221 ms

microsoftsqlserver.png

microsoftsqlserver.png

226 ms

ibmdb2-logo.png

ibmdb2-logo.png

237 ms

postgresql-logo.png

postgresql-logo.png

281 ms

mysql-logo.png

mysql-logo.png

278 ms

address-verification.png

address-verification.png

490 ms

deduping.webp

deduping.webp

295 ms

master-data-management.webp

master-data-management.webp

439 ms

doesnt-have-to-be-hard.png

doesnt-have-to-be-hard.png

343 ms

time-to-value.png

time-to-value.png

360 ms

turn-on-a-dime-1.png

turn-on-a-dime-1.png

402 ms

LDIbaomQNQcsA88c7O9yZ4KMCoOg4IA6-91aHEjcWuA_KUn9Qx_T.woff

LDIbaomQNQcsA88c7O9yZ4KMCoOg4IA6-91aHEjcWuA_KUn9Qx_T.woff

17 ms

LDIbaomQNQcsA88c7O9yZ4KMCoOg4IA6-91aHEjcWuA_KUn9Qx_Q.ttf

LDIbaomQNQcsA88c7O9yZ4KMCoOg4IA6-91aHEjcWuA_KUn9Qx_Q.ttf

24 ms

LDIbaomQNQcsA88c7O9yZ4KMCoOg4IA6-91aHEjcWuA_Tkn9Qx_T.woff

LDIbaomQNQcsA88c7O9yZ4KMCoOg4IA6-91aHEjcWuA_Tkn9Qx_T.woff

36 ms

LDIbaomQNQcsA88c7O9yZ4KMCoOg4IA6-91aHEjcWuA_Tkn9Qx_Q.ttf

LDIbaomQNQcsA88c7O9yZ4KMCoOg4IA6-91aHEjcWuA_Tkn9Qx_Q.ttf

35 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9Z1JlEw.woff

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9Z1JlEw.woff

39 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9Z1JlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9Z1JlEA.ttf

36 ms

pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJnedA.woff

pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJnedA.woff

39 ms

pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJnedw.ttf

pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJnedw.ttf

39 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6Z1JlEw.woff

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6Z1JlEw.woff

40 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6Z1JlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6Z1JlEA.ttf

40 ms

Accessibility Review

acmedata.net accessibility score

73

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

acmedata.net best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

acmedata.net SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Acmedata.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Acmedata.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

acmedata.net

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Acme Data. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: