Tools & Wizards About Us
acrolite.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 50

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    68% of other websites

  • 50

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 21% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 84

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    52% of websites

acrolite.net

Acrolite :: Fiber Optic Lighting and Sensing Components And Assemblies For The Medical Device Industry

Page Load Speed

1.6 sec in total

First Response

368 ms

Resources Loaded

976 ms

Page Rendered

284 ms

acrolite.net screenshot

About Website

Welcome to acrolite.net homepage info - get ready to check Acrolite best content right away, or after learning these important things about acrolite.net

Contract Manufacture Of Glass Fiber Optic Lighting And Sensing Components And Assemblies For The Medical Device Industry

Visit acrolite.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Acrolite.net page load time and found that the first response time was 368 ms and then it took 1.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

acrolite.net performance score

50

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.1 s

80/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.1 s

2/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.6 s

53/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value510 ms

57/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.5 s

38/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.acrolite.net

368 ms

ccm.base.css

26 ms

jquery.js

88 ms

ccm.base.js

67 ms

email_deobfuscator_html.js

73 ms

Our browser made a total of 43 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 77% of them (33 requests) were addressed to the original Acrolite.net, 16% (7 requests) were made to Btn.createsend1.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (368 ms) belongs to the original domain Acrolite.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 169.9 kB (10%)

Content Size

1.8 MB

After Optimization

1.6 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Acrolite.net main page is 1.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 21.9 kB

  • Original 28.4 kB
  • After minification 25.3 kB
  • After compression 6.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 3.1 kB, which is 11% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 21.9 kB or 77% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-10%

Potential reduce by 136.6 kB

  • Original 1.4 MB
  • After minification 1.2 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Acrolite images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 9.6 kB

  • Original 374.5 kB
  • After minification 374.5 kB
  • After compression 364.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-10%

Potential reduce by 1.8 kB

  • Original 17.8 kB
  • After minification 17.8 kB
  • After compression 16.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Acrolite.net has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 18 (43%)

Requests Now

42

After Optimization

24

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 42 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Acrolite. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.acrolite.net

www.acrolite.net

368 ms

ccm.base.css

ccm.base.css

26 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

88 ms

ccm.base.js

ccm.base.js

67 ms

email_deobfuscator_html.js

email_deobfuscator_html.js

73 ms

style.css

style.css

77 ms

jquery.cycle.min.js

jquery.cycle.min.js

109 ms

js

js

66 ms

screen.css

screen.css

98 ms

typography.css

typography.css

99 ms

extra-functions.js

extra-functions.js

99 ms

jquery.mousewheel.min.js

jquery.mousewheel.min.js

100 ms

selectivizr-min.js

selectivizr-min.js

150 ms

modernizr.js

modernizr.js

152 ms

sb.min.js

sb.min.js

111 ms

Acrolite_Custom_Fiber_Optic.png

Acrolite_Custom_Fiber_Optic.png

108 ms

drop-nav.png

drop-nav.png

108 ms

Acrolite_ISO_13485-2016Banner_2023.jpg

Acrolite_ISO_13485-2016Banner_2023.jpg

194 ms

AcroliteHomepageBanner_Acrofusion.jpg

AcroliteHomepageBanner_Acrofusion.jpg

163 ms

AcroliteHomepageBanner_SensorAssemblies.jpg

AcroliteHomepageBanner_SensorAssemblies.jpg

165 ms

AcroliteHomepageBanner_Light.jpg

AcroliteHomepageBanner_Light.jpg

194 ms

AcroliteHomepageBanner_BundledAssemblies.jpg

AcroliteHomepageBanner_BundledAssemblies.jpg

195 ms

AcroliteHomepageBanner_FormedFiber.jpg

AcroliteHomepageBanner_FormedFiber.jpg

193 ms

AcroliteHomepageBanner_Monocoil.jpg

AcroliteHomepageBanner_Monocoil.jpg

213 ms

Bundled_Assembly_Btn.png

Bundled_Assembly_Btn.png

197 ms

Micro_fiber_optics_btn.png

Micro_fiber_optics_btn.png

198 ms

Glass_Fiber_btn.png

Glass_Fiber_btn.png

291 ms

Acrofusion_btn.png

Acrofusion_btn.png

214 ms

Sensor_Assemblies_btn.png

Sensor_Assemblies_btn.png

215 ms

Monocoil_btn.png

Monocoil_btn.png

291 ms

fe58e13ed998ef4bee3739ecf648c0f2_f86.png

fe58e13ed998ef4bee3739ecf648c0f2_f86.png

217 ms

top.png

top.png

291 ms

c538dc6c25ba84ed182def65919e8cdf_f91.png

c538dc6c25ba84ed182def65919e8cdf_f91.png

291 ms

9c0ace984c8afbac0b5691745f15fda6_f60.png

9c0ace984c8afbac0b5691745f15fda6_f60.png

292 ms

respond.min.js

respond.min.js

192 ms

subscribe

subscribe

4 ms

subscribe-button.min.css

subscribe-button.min.css

3 ms

subscribe-button-modal.min.css

subscribe-button-modal.min.css

5 ms

subscribebutton.noncc.min.js

subscribebutton.noncc.min.js

15 ms

api.js

api.js

79 ms

8CA845EA22ADF16F.json

8CA845EA22ADF16F.json

12 ms

button.png

button.png

4 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

24 ms

Accessibility Review

acrolite.net accessibility score

50

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

acrolite.net best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

acrolite.net SEO score

84

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Acrolite.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Acrolite.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

acrolite.net

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Acrolite. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: