1.8 sec in total
154 ms
1.5 sec
225 ms
Click here to check amazing Acxiom content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about acxiom.com
Acxiom’s data and technology have transformed marketing – giving our clients the power to successfully manage audiences, personalize customer experiences and create profitable customer relationships.
Visit acxiom.comWe analyzed Acxiom.com page load time and found that the first response time was 154 ms and then it took 1.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.
acxiom.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.0 s
85/100
10%
Value2.7 s
86/100
25%
Value4.2 s
78/100
10%
Value1,130 ms
23/100
30%
Value0.001
100/100
15%
Value13.7 s
11/100
10%
154 ms
27 ms
61 ms
18 ms
23 ms
Our browser made a total of 92 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Acxiom.com, 66% (61 requests) were made to D21532kvzc3714.cloudfront.net and 4% (4 requests) were made to F.vimeocdn.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (772 ms) relates to the external source Google-analytics.com.
Page size can be reduced by 2.3 MB (61%)
3.8 MB
1.5 MB
In fact, the total size of Acxiom.com main page is 3.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 1.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 61.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 61.7 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 269.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Acxiom needs image optimization as it can save up to 269.7 kB or 24% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 1.2 MB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 1.2 MB or 71% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 724.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Acxiom.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 724.5 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 57 (71%)
80
23
The browser has sent 80 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Acxiom. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 46 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.acxiom.com
154 ms
css
27 ms
css
61 ms
polls-css.css.gzip
18 ms
mediaelementplayer.min.css.gzip
23 ms
wp-mediaelement.css.gzip
22 ms
rgs.css.gzip
22 ms
font-awesome.min.css.gzip
22 ms
steadysets.css.gzip
21 ms
linecon.css.gzip
23 ms
style.css.gzip
47 ms
responsive.css.gzip
41 ms
style.css.gzip
40 ms
jquery.js.gzip
43 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js.gzip
39 ms
modernizr.js.gzip
43 ms
js_composer_front.css.gzip
53 ms
core.min.js.gzip
52 ms
widget.min.js.gzip
51 ms
position.min.js.gzip
53 ms
menu.min.js.gzip
53 ms
autocomplete.min.js.gzip
102 ms
wpss-search-suggest.js.gzip
101 ms
ssba.min.js.gzip
99 ms
polls-js.js.gzip
99 ms
superfish.js.gzip
100 ms
imagesLoaded.min.js.gzip
99 ms
easing.js.gzip
101 ms
respond.js.gzip
101 ms
swipe.min.js.gzip
106 ms
nicescroll.js.gzip
108 ms
sticky.js.gzip
100 ms
prettyPhoto.js.gzip
105 ms
jquery.flexslider-min.js.gzip
108 ms
jquery.isotope.min.js.gzip
107 ms
carouFredSel.min.js.gzip
107 ms
appear.js.gzip
111 ms
init.js.gzip
110 ms
blog-masonry.js.gzip
113 ms
munchkin.js
109 ms
conversion.js
45 ms
mediaelement-and-player.min.js.gzip
109 ms
wp-mediaelement.js.gzip
103 ms
nectar-slider.js.gzip
104 ms
nectar-love.js.gzip
106 ms
wp-embed.min.js.gzip
106 ms
js_composer_front.js.gzip
105 ms
marketo.js.gzip
111 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
83 ms
gtm.js
442 ms
YIc9tWMo.min.js
28 ms
amc.js
58 ms
acxiom-logo-r.png
26 ms
home-screen.jpg
417 ms
hearst-logo.png
32 ms
tivo-logo.png
36 ms
macys-logo.png
31 ms
united-logo.png
32 ms
epson-logo.png
33 ms
acxiom-data-packages3.png
417 ms
icon_enhanced_notice_lg.png
34 ms
ect.html.gz
10 ms
pixel
8 ms
pixel
5 ms
ip.json
386 ms
sitecatalystnew.js
357 ms
analytics.js
772 ms
munchkin.js
57 ms
nectar-loading.gif
37 ms
diagonal_line.png
440 ms
jplayer.png
36 ms
437 ms
-_Ctzj9b56b8RgXW8FAriRsxEYwM7FgeyaSgU71cLG0.woff
435 ms
CcKI4k9un7TZVWzRVT-T8xsxEYwM7FgeyaSgU71cLG0.woff
436 ms
JbtMzqLaYbbbCL9X6EvaIxsxEYwM7FgeyaSgU71cLG0.woff
437 ms
OpenSansBold-webfont.woff
49 ms
OpenSans-Regular-webfont.woff
34 ms
fontawesome-webfont.svg
51 ms
icomoon.woff
50 ms
OpenSans-Light-webfont.woff
51 ms
117332597
107 ms
79 ms
collect
12 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
10 ms
collect
69 ms
player.js
95 ms
player.css
76 ms
ga.js
94 ms
vuid.min.js
72 ms
__utm.gif
59 ms
proxy.html
34 ms
503989866.jpg
61 ms
acxiom.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
acxiom.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
acxiom.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Acxiom.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Acxiom.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
acxiom.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Acxiom. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: