3.4 sec in total
324 ms
2.9 sec
204 ms
Visit adagger.com now to see the best up-to-date Adagger content for Germany and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about adagger.com
adagger is an experienced software development and consulting agency working at the cutting edge of technology.
Visit adagger.comWe analyzed Adagger.com page load time and found that the first response time was 324 ms and then it took 3.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
adagger.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.2 s
79/100
10%
Value4.9 s
28/100
25%
Value3.6 s
87/100
10%
Value90 ms
99/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value3.4 s
93/100
10%
324 ms
524 ms
293 ms
203 ms
416 ms
Our browser made a total of 48 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 96% of them (46 requests) were addressed to the original Adagger.com, 4% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Adagger.com.
Page size can be reduced by 499.2 kB (74%)
675.5 kB
176.2 kB
In fact, the total size of Adagger.com main page is 675.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 333.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 14.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 3.7 kB, which is 21% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 14.1 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Adagger images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 207.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 207.5 kB or 65% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 277.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Adagger.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 277.7 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 35 (76%)
46
11
The browser has sent 46 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Adagger. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 25 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
adagger.com
324 ms
524 ms
menu-85a7e8721c7a5f894f71f1a95143809b.css
293 ms
grid-responsive.css
203 ms
bootstrap.css
416 ms
master-f15b493ebc295132efb851ec387ac1ae.css
426 ms
mediaqueries.css
209 ms
thirdparty-k2.css
309 ms
rt_chapelco-custom.css
306 ms
mosaic.css
412 ms
template.css
390 ms
jquery.jqplot.min.css
409 ms
shCore.css
422 ms
shThemeDefault.css
488 ms
mootools-core.js
836 ms
mootools-more.js
1036 ms
core.js
531 ms
caption.js
535 ms
jquery-1.8.3.min.js
747 ms
jquery-noconflict.js
585 ms
browser-engines.js
634 ms
rokmediaqueries.js
638 ms
rokmediaqueries.js
682 ms
responsive.js
734 ms
mootools-mobile.js
740 ms
rokmediaqueries.js
780 ms
roksprocket.js
853 ms
moofx.js
949 ms
roksprocket.request.js
852 ms
mosaic.js
975 ms
mosaic.js
941 ms
jquery.jqplot.min.js
1144 ms
jqplot.dateAxisRenderer.min.js
950 ms
shCore.js
1105 ms
shBrushXml.js
1105 ms
shBrushCss.js
1106 ms
shBrushJScript.js
1105 ms
jquery.cycle.all.js
1053 ms
analytics.js
56 ms
adagger.png
107 ms
menu-separator.png
106 ms
menu-shadow.png
106 ms
dropdown-separator.png
114 ms
de.gif
112 ms
abstract.jpg
211 ms
module-shadow.png
207 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
491 ms
collect
12 ms
adagger.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
adagger.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
adagger.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Document doesn't have a valid hreflang
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Adagger.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Adagger.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
adagger.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Adagger. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: