Tools & Wizards About Us
adamstratton.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 59

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    74% of other websites

  • 90

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 74% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

adamstratton.com

Log into Facebook

Page Load Speed

779 ms in total

First Response

15 ms

Resources Loaded

690 ms

Page Rendered

74 ms

adamstratton.com screenshot

About Website

Visit adamstratton.com now to see the best up-to-date Adamstratton content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about adamstratton.com

Log into Facebook to start sharing and connecting with your friends, family, and people you know.

Visit adamstratton.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Adamstratton.com page load time and found that the first response time was 15 ms and then it took 764 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

adamstratton.com performance score

59

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.1 s

8/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.6 s

3/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.1 s

61/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value5.7 s

68/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

adamstratton.com

15 ms

login.php

176 ms

ZXwOcP9E7mM.png

17 ms

k97pj8-or6s.png

10 ms

hsts-pixel.gif

106 ms

Our browser made a total of 5 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 20% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Adamstratton.com, 40% (2 requests) were made to Static.xx.fbcdn.net and 20% (1 request) were made to M.facebook.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (176 ms) relates to the external source M.facebook.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 5.9 kB (25%)

Content Size

23.7 kB

After Optimization

17.8 kB

  • HTML
  • Images

In fact, the total size of Adamstratton.com main page is 23.7 kB. This result falls within a vast category (top 1 000 000) of heavyweight, probably not optimized, and thus slow loading web pages. Only 5% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 14.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-64%

Potential reduce by 5.9 kB

  • Original 9.3 kB
  • After minification 9.2 kB
  • After compression 3.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 5.9 kB or 64% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 14.4 kB
  • After minification 14.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Adamstratton images are well optimized though.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

3

After Optimization

3

  • Images

The browser has sent 3 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Adamstratton. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

adamstratton.com

adamstratton.com

15 ms

login.php

login.php

176 ms

ZXwOcP9E7mM.png

ZXwOcP9E7mM.png

17 ms

k97pj8-or6s.png

k97pj8-or6s.png

10 ms

hsts-pixel.gif

hsts-pixel.gif

106 ms

Accessibility Review

adamstratton.com accessibility score

90

Accessibility Issues

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

adamstratton.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

adamstratton.com SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

High

Page is blocked from indexing

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Adamstratton.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Adamstratton.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

adamstratton.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Adamstratton. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: