Tools & Wizards About Us
adaptec.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 10

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    23% of other websites

  • 99

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 96% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

adaptec.com

Adaptec - Technical Support

Page Load Speed

3.9 sec in total

First Response

674 ms

Resources Loaded

2.7 sec

Page Rendered

516 ms

adaptec.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Adaptec content for Russia. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about adaptec.com

Adaptec - Technical Support Index

Visit adaptec.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Adaptec.com page load time and found that the first response time was 674 ms and then it took 3.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

adaptec.com performance score

10

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.3 s

7/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value12.5 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value10.4 s

8/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,800 ms

3/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.258

48/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value19.6 s

2/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

storage

674 ms

clientlib-base.min.ACSHASHcd93585566a2649e840519f47d841919.css

246 ms

jquery.min.ACSHASH1fc733054ddb2e2fcd4a0f763671047b.js

80 ms

utils.min.ACSHASH15b6fc27cccbddb5fb7b88a7c6a2c7e4.js

102 ms

clientlib-dependencies.min.ACSHASH4015504b54c2e5edb304f6321dc0507a.js

118 ms

Our browser made a total of 40 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Adaptec.com, 3% (1 request) were made to Assets.adobedtm.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) relates to the external source Microchip.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.4 MB (37%)

Content Size

4.0 MB

After Optimization

2.5 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Adaptec.com main page is 4.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-94%

Potential reduce by 821.2 kB

  • Original 871.2 kB
  • After minification 526.0 kB
  • After compression 50.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 345.2 kB, which is 40% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 821.2 kB or 94% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-9%

Potential reduce by 221.9 kB

  • Original 2.4 MB
  • After minification 2.2 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Adaptec images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-57%

Potential reduce by 404.5 kB

  • Original 704.1 kB
  • After minification 703.3 kB
  • After compression 299.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 404.5 kB or 57% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 15 (54%)

Requests Now

28

After Optimization

13

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 28 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Adaptec. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

storage

storage

674 ms

clientlib-base.min.ACSHASHcd93585566a2649e840519f47d841919.css

clientlib-base.min.ACSHASHcd93585566a2649e840519f47d841919.css

246 ms

jquery.min.ACSHASH1fc733054ddb2e2fcd4a0f763671047b.js

jquery.min.ACSHASH1fc733054ddb2e2fcd4a0f763671047b.js

80 ms

utils.min.ACSHASH15b6fc27cccbddb5fb7b88a7c6a2c7e4.js

utils.min.ACSHASH15b6fc27cccbddb5fb7b88a7c6a2c7e4.js

102 ms

clientlib-dependencies.min.ACSHASH4015504b54c2e5edb304f6321dc0507a.js

clientlib-dependencies.min.ACSHASH4015504b54c2e5edb304f6321dc0507a.js

118 ms

clientlib-dependencies.min.ACSHASH436ae4eca0484bb82893b3dbe2b033f2.css

clientlib-dependencies.min.ACSHASH436ae4eca0484bb82893b3dbe2b033f2.css

70 ms

clientlib-site.min.ACSHASHd87c0872012303a4195aef95813a86c4.css

clientlib-site.min.ACSHASHd87c0872012303a4195aef95813a86c4.css

80 ms

clientlib-devhelp.min.ACSHASH8baf8db3d2afb029d620b46fc5f08652.css

clientlib-devhelp.min.ACSHASH8baf8db3d2afb029d620b46fc5f08652.css

129 ms

launch-7722c883cc43.min.js

launch-7722c883cc43.min.js

17 ms

7b5cdc38

7b5cdc38

427 ms

clientlib-analytics.min.ACSHASH078a61925fef02023abee50c8e49c144.js

clientlib-analytics.min.ACSHASH078a61925fef02023abee50c8e49c144.js

111 ms

clientlib-site.min.ACSHASH492e10e4a9c08f1156d7a9d0b11953d8.js

clientlib-site.min.ACSHASH492e10e4a9c08f1156d7a9d0b11953d8.js

105 ms

container.min.ACSHASH68e8a508c100f218cc66bb13a94d1002.js

container.min.ACSHASH68e8a508c100f218cc66bb13a94d1002.js

397 ms

clientlib-base.min.ACSHASH65aa06b88270e32b9d336f382263fd04.js

clientlib-base.min.ACSHASH65aa06b88270e32b9d336f382263fd04.js

158 ms

sbsd

sbsd

333 ms

eQAB

eQAB

397 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

159 ms

HCSEV-U5H4D-73E56-YQZHY-A3PRY

HCSEV-U5H4D-73E56-YQZHY-A3PRY

247 ms

smartroc-family-frontal.png

smartroc-family-frontal.png

425 ms

ic-mcrsm-1pin-smartioc-family.jpeg

ic-mcrsm-1pin-smartioc-family.jpeg

584 ms

tachyon-blank1-frontal.png

tachyon-blank1-frontal.png

513 ms

sxp-sas-expanders-frontal.jpeg

sxp-sas-expanders-frontal.jpeg

1075 ms

flashtec-nvme-ps.png

flashtec-nvme-ps.png

745 ms

switchtec-pcie-switches-frontal.jpeg

switchtec-pcie-switches-frontal.jpeg

913 ms

smartraid-3100-24i-angle-copy.jpeg

smartraid-3100-24i-angle-copy.jpeg

1204 ms

200407-dcs-photo-2290400-r-adaptec-smarthba-2100-8i-msc.jpeg

200407-dcs-photo-2290400-r-adaptec-smarthba-2100-8i-msc.jpeg

735 ms

191204-dcs-photo-2283400-r-adaptec-sas-expander-82285t-msc.jpeg

191204-dcs-photo-2283400-r-adaptec-sas-expander-82285t-msc.jpeg

784 ms

adaptec-sas-hd-cable.png

adaptec-sas-hd-cable.png

1007 ms

OpenSans-Regular.ttf

OpenSans-Regular.ttf

773 ms

OpenSans-Light.ttf

OpenSans-Light.ttf

745 ms

OpenSans-SemiBold.ttf

OpenSans-SemiBold.ttf

779 ms

OpenSans-Bold.ttf

OpenSans-Bold.ttf

801 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

727 ms

fa-v4compatibility.ttf

fa-v4compatibility.ttf

746 ms

fa-regular-400.ttf

fa-regular-400.ttf

946 ms

fa-brands-400.ttf

fa-brands-400.ttf

893 ms

fa-solid-900.ttf

fa-solid-900.ttf

980 ms

fa-light-300.ttf

fa-light-300.ttf

826 ms

fa-thin-100.ttf

fa-thin-100.ttf

1181 ms

config.json

config.json

42 ms

Accessibility Review

adaptec.com accessibility score

99

Accessibility Issues

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

adaptec.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

adaptec.com SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Adaptec.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Adaptec.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

adaptec.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Adaptec. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: