Tools & Wizards About Us
adcryp.to screenshot

Report Summary

  • 31

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    51% of other websites

  • 79

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 47% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    20% of websites

  • 82

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    44% of websites

adcryp.to

Cryptocurrency Advertising Network | Bitcoin Network Marketing

Page Load Speed

1.8 sec in total

First Response

27 ms

Resources Loaded

1.3 sec

Page Rendered

505 ms

adcryp.to screenshot

About Website

Visit adcryp.to now to see the best up-to-date Adcryp content for Peru and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about adcryp.to

Find the best platform for cryptocurrency/bitcoin advertising. Adcryp.to is an online marketing place, where advertisers can sell their ads to publishers who will inturn return traffic to the advertis...

Visit adcryp.to

Key Findings

We analyzed Adcryp.to page load time and found that the first response time was 27 ms and then it took 1.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

adcryp.to performance score

31

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.6 s

33/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.6 s

8/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.5 s

54/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,460 ms

14/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.001

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value13.4 s

11/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

adcryp.to

27 ms

adcryp.to

217 ms

jquery.min.js

133 ms

jquery-ui-1.8.23.custom.min.js

166 ms

bootstrap.min.js

162 ms

Our browser made a total of 58 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 66% of them (38 requests) were addressed to the original Adcryp.to, 19% (11 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 9% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (624 ms) belongs to the original domain Adcryp.to.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 154.4 kB (6%)

Content Size

2.4 MB

After Optimization

2.3 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Adcryp.to main page is 2.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 2.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 40.4 kB

  • Original 49.7 kB
  • After minification 38.0 kB
  • After compression 9.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 11.7 kB, which is 23% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 40.4 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 51.5 kB

  • Original 2.2 MB
  • After minification 2.1 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Adcryp images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-23%

Potential reduce by 39.9 kB

  • Original 174.5 kB
  • After minification 174.5 kB
  • After compression 134.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 39.9 kB or 23% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-36%

Potential reduce by 22.6 kB

  • Original 62.3 kB
  • After minification 46.1 kB
  • After compression 39.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Adcryp.to needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 22.6 kB or 36% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 31 (72%)

Requests Now

43

After Optimization

12

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 43 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Adcryp. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 17 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 16 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

adcryp.to

adcryp.to

27 ms

adcryp.to

adcryp.to

217 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

133 ms

jquery-ui-1.8.23.custom.min.js

jquery-ui-1.8.23.custom.min.js

166 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

162 ms

jquery.simplyscroll.js

jquery.simplyscroll.js

163 ms

common.js

common.js

164 ms

jpreLoader.js

jpreLoader.js

164 ms

jquery.isotope.min.js

jquery.isotope.min.js

249 ms

jquery.prettyPhoto.js

jquery.prettyPhoto.js

246 ms

easing.js

easing.js

242 ms

jquery.ui.totop.js

jquery.ui.totop.js

245 ms

jquery.flexslider-min.js

jquery.flexslider-min.js

255 ms

jquery.scrollto.js

jquery.scrollto.js

266 ms

owl.carousel.js

owl.carousel.js

359 ms

classie.js

classie.js

354 ms

designesia.js

designesia.js

358 ms

css

css

48 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

353 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

42 ms

public-style.css

public-style.css

372 ms

blazing-orange.css

blazing-orange.css

383 ms

animate.css

animate.css

469 ms

flexslider.css

flexslider.css

624 ms

plugin.css

plugin.css

472 ms

owl.carousel.css

owl.carousel.css

471 ms

owl.theme.css

owl.theme.css

474 ms

settings.css

settings.css

494 ms

rev-settings.css

rev-settings.css

571 ms

css

css

66 ms

css

css

67 ms

js

js

81 ms

7606

7606

79 ms

css

css

21 ms

css

css

17 ms

logo.jpg

logo.jpg

287 ms

about_img.png

about_img.png

153 ms

failure_red.png

failure_red.png

152 ms

bg.jpg

bg.jpg

148 ms

advertiser1.png

advertiser1.png

193 ms

slider-bg1.jpg

slider-bg1.jpg

189 ms

publisher_home.png

publisher_home.png

212 ms

OpenSans-Regular.ttf

OpenSans-Regular.ttf

266 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf

81 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVc.ttf

81 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVc.ttf

135 ms

OpenSans-Bold.ttf

OpenSans-Bold.ttf

275 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf

145 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

65 ms

TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs1_FvsUZiYA.ttf

TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs1_FvsUZiYA.ttf

149 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaorCIPrQ.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaorCIPrQ.ttf

147 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvoorCIPrQ.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvoorCIPrQ.ttf

150 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVuEorCIPrQ.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVuEorCIPrQ.ttf

149 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVsEpbCIPrQ.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVsEpbCIPrQ.ttf

146 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVs9pbCIPrQ.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVs9pbCIPrQ.ttf

148 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtzpbCIPrQ.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtzpbCIPrQ.ttf

185 ms

ui.totop.png

ui.totop.png

141 ms

main.js

main.js

24 ms

Accessibility Review

adcryp.to accessibility score

79

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

adcryp.to best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

adcryp.to SEO score

82

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

robots.txt is not valid

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Adcryp.to can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Adcryp.to main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

adcryp.to

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Adcryp. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: