Tools & Wizards About Us
address-validator.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 54

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    71% of other websites

  • 73

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 38% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

address-validator.net

Address Validator: Postal Address Validation & Address Verification Service

Page Load Speed

4.1 sec in total

First Response

304 ms

Resources Loaded

2.5 sec

Page Rendered

1.2 sec

address-validator.net screenshot

About Website

Welcome to address-validator.net homepage info - get ready to check Address Validator best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about address-validator.net

With our free postal address verification and international address validation service you can easily verify if any USPS or international postal address is valid and deliverable.

Visit address-validator.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Address-validator.net page load time and found that the first response time was 304 ms and then it took 3.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

address-validator.net performance score

54

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.8 s

26/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.4 s

20/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.4 s

56/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value360 ms

72/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.132

81/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value5.7 s

68/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

address-validator.net

304 ms

address-validator.net

361 ms

694 ms

style.css

175 ms

style-val.css

263 ms

Our browser made a total of 55 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 4% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Address-validator.net, 93% (51 requests) were made to Byteplant.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Assets.capterra.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (782 ms) relates to the external source Byteplant.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 438.5 kB (39%)

Content Size

1.1 MB

After Optimization

681.4 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Address-validator.net main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 817.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 118.4 kB

  • Original 140.9 kB
  • After minification 124.3 kB
  • After compression 22.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 16.6 kB, which is 12% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 118.4 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-39%

Potential reduce by 315.9 kB

  • Original 817.3 kB
  • After minification 501.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Address Validator needs image optimization as it can save up to 315.9 kB or 39% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 261 B

  • Original 133.5 kB
  • After minification 133.5 kB
  • After compression 133.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-14%

Potential reduce by 3.8 kB

  • Original 28.1 kB
  • After minification 28.1 kB
  • After compression 24.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Address-validator.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 3.8 kB or 14% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 12 (24%)

Requests Now

49

After Optimization

37

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 49 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Address Validator. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

address-validator.net

address-validator.net

304 ms

address-validator.net

address-validator.net

361 ms

694 ms

style.css

style.css

175 ms

style-val.css

style-val.css

263 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

352 ms

jquery-3.6.0.min.js

jquery-3.6.0.min.js

351 ms

slick.min.js

slick.min.js

270 ms

common.js

common.js

260 ms

select2.min.css

select2.min.css

347 ms

select2.min.js

select2.min.js

381 ms

bulma.css

bulma.css

350 ms

sweetalert2.min.js

sweetalert2.min.js

438 ms

jquery.selectric.min.js

jquery.selectric.min.js

356 ms

jquery.jsonp-2.4.0.min.js

jquery.jsonp-2.4.0.min.js

354 ms

jquery.fancybox.min.js

jquery.fancybox.min.js

466 ms

jquery.fancybox.min.css

jquery.fancybox.min.css

464 ms

0c1244ce3de2c2747ac29565e0e0d6cf.svg

0c1244ce3de2c2747ac29565e0e0d6cf.svg

16 ms

logo.png

logo.png

402 ms

uk.svg

uk.svg

284 ms

de.svg

de.svg

286 ms

cheveron-right.svg

cheveron-right.svg

287 ms

burger.svg

burger.svg

288 ms

img-hero.png

img-hero.png

431 ms

AddressVerification_HighPerformerG2.png

AddressVerification_HighPerformerG2.png

403 ms

1.png

1.png

403 ms

alibaba.png

alibaba.png

403 ms

2.png

2.png

565 ms

3.png

3.png

429 ms

shein.png

shein.png

517 ms

4.png

4.png

433 ms

5.png

5.png

435 ms

6.png

6.png

517 ms

toyota_logo.png

toyota_logo.png

602 ms

8.png

8.png

519 ms

9.png

9.png

521 ms

10.png

10.png

604 ms

11.png

11.png

688 ms

12.png

12.png

606 ms

13.png

13.png

608 ms

14.png

14.png

651 ms

15.png

15.png

690 ms

16.png

16.png

689 ms

17.png

17.png

692 ms

sonova.png

sonova.png

705 ms

ewe.jpg

ewe.jpg

658 ms

anydesk.png

anydesk.png

764 ms

docmorris.png

docmorris.png

666 ms

SharpSans.otf

SharpSans.otf

751 ms

4.5.png

4.5.png

119 ms

SharpSansLight.otf

SharpSansLight.otf

782 ms

SharpSansBold.otf

SharpSansBold.otf

743 ms

logo_footer.png

logo_footer.png

606 ms

approved-av.svg

approved-av.svg

604 ms

carousel-arrow.svg

carousel-arrow.svg

548 ms

Accessibility Review

address-validator.net accessibility score

73

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique

Best Practices

address-validator.net best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

address-validator.net SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Address-validator.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Address-validator.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

address-validator.net

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Address Validator. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: