Tools & Wizards About Us
adelaidefencingsolutions.com.au screenshot

Report Summary

  • 45

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    64% of other websites

  • 88

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 68% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 99

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    93% of websites

adelaidefencingsolutions.com.au

Fencing Adelaide | Adelaide Fencing Solutions

Page Load Speed

3.5 sec in total

First Response

386 ms

Resources Loaded

3 sec

Page Rendered

90 ms

adelaidefencingsolutions.com.au screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Adelaide Fencing Solutions content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about adelaidefencingsolutions.com.au

Adelaide Fencing Solutions offers a wide choice of Custom Fencing and Gates to the Adelaide market. Our range covers Colorbond fencing, Slat fencing, Tubular Fencing, Pool Fencing,Retaining Walls, Ren...

Visit adelaidefencingsolutions.com.au

Key Findings

We analyzed Adelaidefencingsolutions.com.au page load time and found that the first response time was 386 ms and then it took 3.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

adelaidefencingsolutions.com.au performance score

45

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.5 s

67/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.4 s

68/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.5 s

54/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value3,860 ms

1/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.013

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value14.4 s

9/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.adelaidefencingsolutions.com.au

386 ms

minified.js

64 ms

focus-within-polyfill.js

61 ms

polyfill.min.js

58 ms

8875.5956d950.bundle.min.js

177 ms

Our browser made a total of 47 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Adelaidefencingsolutions.com.au, 36% (17 requests) were made to Static.parastorage.com and 30% (14 requests) were made to Static.wixstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.3 sec) relates to the external source Static.wixstatic.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 316.1 kB (45%)

Content Size

696.6 kB

After Optimization

380.5 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Adelaidefencingsolutions.com.au main page is 696.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 339.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 261.3 kB

  • Original 339.6 kB
  • After minification 337.8 kB
  • After compression 78.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 261.3 kB or 77% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-16%

Potential reduce by 6.7 kB

  • Original 41.5 kB
  • After minification 34.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Adelaide Fencing Solutions needs image optimization as it can save up to 6.7 kB or 16% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-15%

Potential reduce by 48.1 kB

  • Original 315.5 kB
  • After minification 315.5 kB
  • After compression 267.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 48.1 kB or 15% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 12 (39%)

Requests Now

31

After Optimization

19

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 31 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Adelaide Fencing Solutions. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.adelaidefencingsolutions.com.au

www.adelaidefencingsolutions.com.au

386 ms

minified.js

minified.js

64 ms

focus-within-polyfill.js

focus-within-polyfill.js

61 ms

polyfill.min.js

polyfill.min.js

58 ms

8875.5956d950.bundle.min.js

8875.5956d950.bundle.min.js

177 ms

thunderbolt-commons.6abcfe1a.bundle.min.js

thunderbolt-commons.6abcfe1a.bundle.min.js

182 ms

main.e9b48348.bundle.min.js

main.e9b48348.bundle.min.js

184 ms

main.renderer.1d21f023.bundle.min.js

main.renderer.1d21f023.bundle.min.js

174 ms

lodash.min.js

lodash.min.js

180 ms

react.production.min.js

react.production.min.js

177 ms

react-dom.production.min.js

react-dom.production.min.js

184 ms

browser-deprecation.bundle.es5.js

browser-deprecation.bundle.es5.js

182 ms

siteTags.bundle.min.js

siteTags.bundle.min.js

183 ms

2efc2d_2591d482de6540809569cdcfa279a1ad~mv2_d_5056_2514_s_4_2.jpeg

2efc2d_2591d482de6540809569cdcfa279a1ad~mv2_d_5056_2514_s_4_2.jpeg

368 ms

bundle.min.js

bundle.min.js

114 ms

2efc2d_341ac28aba154ffc84a4b41e8270bb8a~mv2.jpg

2efc2d_341ac28aba154ffc84a4b41e8270bb8a~mv2.jpg

244 ms

College%203.jpg

College%203.jpg

248 ms

2efc2d_9f7344e4f8824c8fa1b3a0a936954485~mv2_d_4869_3246_s_4_2.jpeg

2efc2d_9f7344e4f8824c8fa1b3a0a936954485~mv2_d_4869_3246_s_4_2.jpeg

333 ms

IMG_0731_JPG.jpg

IMG_0731_JPG.jpg

332 ms

c19c76_376dc1d20bd348b99c4a732a1d6d7c81.png

c19c76_376dc1d20bd348b99c4a732a1d6d7c81.png

105 ms

2efc2d_06d812115692440a803dd24e13e70196~mv2_d_5760_3840_s_4_2.jpeg

2efc2d_06d812115692440a803dd24e13e70196~mv2_d_5760_3840_s_4_2.jpeg

359 ms

2efc2d_99b0eb456e374cdd900cbd12d80fd041~mv2_d_4032_3024_s_4_2.jpg

2efc2d_99b0eb456e374cdd900cbd12d80fd041~mv2_d_4032_3024_s_4_2.jpg

2322 ms

2efc2d_a3c521ce36cd48d397968a289b9eaf7c~mv2_d_4272_2848_s_4_2.jpg

2efc2d_a3c521ce36cd48d397968a289b9eaf7c~mv2_d_4272_2848_s_4_2.jpg

533 ms

2efc2d_f4f19e3a02e6464587696685bab80688~mv2.jpg

2efc2d_f4f19e3a02e6464587696685bab80688~mv2.jpg

572 ms

2efc2d_7f34e88791724048bced85ec2b73e7dd~mv2_d_4032_3024_s_4_2.jpg

2efc2d_7f34e88791724048bced85ec2b73e7dd~mv2_d_4032_3024_s_4_2.jpg

612 ms

2efc2d_6073d12fba7c4e1ba8e05d6c72a42126~mv2.png

2efc2d_6073d12fba7c4e1ba8e05d6c72a42126~mv2.png

533 ms

2efc2d_4d6ce81df7234616820776a11ca8cb0e~mv2.jpg

2efc2d_4d6ce81df7234616820776a11ca8cb0e~mv2.jpg

666 ms

2efc2d_d92f6eeb691f40fab8abcfdeb3de1017~mv2_d_4136_4306_s_4_2.png

2efc2d_d92f6eeb691f40fab8abcfdeb3de1017~mv2_d_4136_4306_s_4_2.png

770 ms

155 ms

152 ms

167 ms

149 ms

146 ms

165 ms

187 ms

186 ms

182 ms

178 ms

181 ms

180 ms

deprecation-en.v5.html

deprecation-en.v5.html

6 ms

bolt-performance

bolt-performance

32 ms

deprecation-style.v5.css

deprecation-style.v5.css

7 ms

right-arrow.svg

right-arrow.svg

7 ms

WixMadeforDisplay_W_Bd.woff

WixMadeforDisplay_W_Bd.woff

11 ms

WixMadeforText_W_Bd.woff

WixMadeforText_W_Bd.woff

11 ms

WixMadeforText_W_Rg.woff

WixMadeforText_W_Rg.woff

10 ms

Accessibility Review

adelaidefencingsolutions.com.au accessibility score

88

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

adelaidefencingsolutions.com.au best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

adelaidefencingsolutions.com.au SEO score

99

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Adelaidefencingsolutions.com.au can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Adelaidefencingsolutions.com.au main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

adelaidefencingsolutions.com.au

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Adelaide Fencing Solutions. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: