Tools & Wizards About Us
adeloma.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 0

    SEO

adeloma.com

Page Load Speed

4.8 sec in total

First Response

435 ms

Resources Loaded

4 sec

Page Rendered

297 ms

adeloma.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to adeloma.com homepage info - get ready to check Adeloma best content right away, or after learning these important things about adeloma.com

Adeloma Türkiye'nin web hosting sağlayıcı şirketlerinden birisidir. Bireysel ve kurumsal müşterilere SSD Web hosting hizmeti vermektedir.

Visit adeloma.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Adeloma.com page load time and found that the first response time was 435 ms and then it took 4.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

adeloma.com performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

adeloma.com

435 ms

www.adeloma.com

799 ms

fonticons.css

145 ms

stylesheet.css

290 ms

font-awesome.min.css

406 ms

Our browser made a total of 34 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 91% of them (31 requests) were addressed to the original Adeloma.com, 6% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Mc.yandex.ru. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2 sec) relates to the external source Mc.yandex.ru.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 17.5 kB (17%)

Content Size

105.6 kB

After Optimization

88.1 kB

  • HTML
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Adeloma.com main page is 105.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 85.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 17.5 kB

  • Original 20.3 kB
  • After minification 11.6 kB
  • After compression 2.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 8.7 kB, which is 43% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 17.5 kB or 86% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 85.3 kB
  • After minification 85.3 kB
  • After compression 85.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 17 (68%)

Requests Now

25

After Optimization

8

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 25 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Adeloma. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

adeloma.com

adeloma.com

435 ms

www.adeloma.com

www.adeloma.com

799 ms

fonticons.css

fonticons.css

145 ms

stylesheet.css

stylesheet.css

290 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

406 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

541 ms

plugins.css

plugins.css

409 ms

style.css

style.css

408 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

425 ms

modernizr-2.8.3-respond-1.4.2.min.js

modernizr-2.8.3-respond-1.4.2.min.js

431 ms

js

js

72 ms

jquery-1.11.2.min.js

jquery-1.11.2.min.js

689 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

676 ms

isotope.min.js

isotope.min.js

677 ms

jquery.easypiechart.min.js

jquery.easypiechart.min.js

677 ms

jquery.mixitup.min.js

jquery.mixitup.min.js

676 ms

jquery.easing.1.3.js

jquery.easing.1.3.js

683 ms

plugins.js

plugins.js

715 ms

main.js

main.js

714 ms

js

js

113 ms

loading.gif

loading.gif

153 ms

adeloma-logo.png

adeloma-logo.png

153 ms

homebg.jpg

homebg.jpg

497 ms

ii1.png

ii1.png

239 ms

featurebg.png

featurebg.png

239 ms

mapbg.png

mapbg.png

374 ms

raleway-light.woff

raleway-light.woff

370 ms

raleway-bold.woff

raleway-bold.woff

482 ms

sanchez-regular.woff

sanchez-regular.woff

292 ms

raleway-regular.woff

raleway-regular.woff

424 ms

raleway-semibold.woff

raleway-semibold.woff

557 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

566 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

643 ms

tag.js

tag.js

1974 ms

SEO Factors

adeloma.com SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    TR

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Adeloma.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is Turkish. Our system also found out that Adeloma.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

adeloma.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Adeloma. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: