Tools & Wizards About Us
adepth.in screenshot

Report Summary

  • 31

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    51% of other websites

  • 84

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 56% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

adepth.in

Home \ Adepth Consulting Engineers

Page Load Speed

5.5 sec in total

First Response

629 ms

Resources Loaded

4.7 sec

Page Rendered

217 ms

adepth.in screenshot

About Website

Welcome to adepth.in homepage info - get ready to check Adepth best content right away, or after learning these important things about adepth.in

Adepth Consulting Engineers

Visit adepth.in

Key Findings

We analyzed Adepth.in page load time and found that the first response time was 629 ms and then it took 4.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

adepth.in performance score

31

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.0 s

10/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value9.8 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value34.3 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value170 ms

93/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.514

15/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value37.1 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

adepth.in

629 ms

css

23 ms

css

41 ms

font-awesome.min.css

190 ms

bootstrap.min.css

565 ms

Our browser made a total of 62 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 87% of them (54 requests) were addressed to the original Adepth.in, 8% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Adepth.in.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 6.2 MB (67%)

Content Size

9.3 MB

After Optimization

3.0 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Adepth.in main page is 9.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 8.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 29.8 kB

  • Original 34.4 kB
  • After minification 23.2 kB
  • After compression 4.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 11.2 kB, which is 32% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 29.8 kB or 86% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-70%

Potential reduce by 6.2 MB

  • Original 8.9 MB
  • After minification 2.7 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Adepth needs image optimization as it can save up to 6.2 MB or 70% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 11.4 kB

  • Original 276.2 kB
  • After minification 276.2 kB
  • After compression 264.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-10%

Potential reduce by 12.5 kB

  • Original 120.6 kB
  • After minification 120.6 kB
  • After compression 108.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Adepth.in has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 38 (75%)

Requests Now

51

After Optimization

13

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 51 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Adepth. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 23 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 17 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

adepth.in

adepth.in

629 ms

css

css

23 ms

css

css

41 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

190 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

565 ms

hover-dropdown-menu.css

hover-dropdown-menu.css

384 ms

icons.css

icons.css

579 ms

revolution-slider.css

revolution-slider.css

449 ms

settings.css

settings.css

469 ms

animate.min.css

animate.min.css

473 ms

owl.carousel.css

owl.carousel.css

574 ms

owl.theme.css

owl.theme.css

667 ms

owl.transitions.css

owl.transitions.css

701 ms

image-zoom.css

image-zoom.css

702 ms

prettyPhoto.css

prettyPhoto.css

750 ms

style.css

style.css

954 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

769 ms

color.css

color.css

886 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

1154 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

929 ms

hover-dropdown-menu.js

hover-dropdown-menu.js

936 ms

jquery.hover-dropdown-menu-addon.js

jquery.hover-dropdown-menu-addon.js

1028 ms

jquery.easing.1.3.js

jquery.easing.1.3.js

1105 ms

jquery.sticky.js

jquery.sticky.js

1169 ms

bootstrapValidator.min.js

bootstrapValidator.min.js

1123 ms

jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js

jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js

1143 ms

jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js

jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js

1151 ms

revolution-custom.js

revolution-custom.js

1336 ms

jquery.mixitup.min.js

jquery.mixitup.min.js

1310 ms

jquery.appear.js

jquery.appear.js

1333 ms

effect.js

effect.js

1342 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

1382 ms

image-zoom.js

image-zoom.js

1390 ms

jquery.prettyPhoto.js

jquery.prettyPhoto.js

1497 ms

jquery.parallax-1.1.3.js

jquery.parallax-1.1.3.js

1524 ms

jquery.countTo.js

jquery.countTo.js

1566 ms

carousel.js

carousel.js

1534 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

1614 ms

tweetie.min.js

tweetie.min.js

1621 ms

jquery.mb.YTPlayer.js

jquery.mb.YTPlayer.js

1500 ms

custom.js

custom.js

1336 ms

adepth_logo-3.png

adepth_logo-3.png

1859 ms

adepth_logo-3.png

adepth_logo-3.png

2785 ms

slider-1.jpg

slider-1.jpg

1787 ms

11.png

11.png

3442 ms

22.png

22.png

2053 ms

33.png

33.png

2682 ms

slider-21.png

slider-21.png

2444 ms

slider-3.jpg

slider-3.jpg

1998 ms

4.jpg

4.jpg

2113 ms

P5sfzZCDf9_T_3cV7NCUECyoxNk37cxcABrE.ttf

P5sfzZCDf9_T_3cV7NCUECyoxNk37cxcABrE.ttf

9 ms

P5sfzZCDf9_T_3cV7NCUECyoxNk3CstcABrE.ttf

P5sfzZCDf9_T_3cV7NCUECyoxNk3CstcABrE.ttf

13 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

1864 ms

TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs1xZosUZiYA.ttf

TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs1xZosUZiYA.ttf

22 ms

TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs1_FvsUZiYA.ttf

TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs1_FvsUZiYA.ttf

22 ms

TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs169vsUZiYA.ttf

TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs169vsUZiYA.ttf

22 ms

icomoon.woff

icomoon.woff

2161 ms

glyphicons-halflings-regular.woff

glyphicons-halflings-regular.woff

2056 ms

tweet.php

tweet.php

1945 ms

loader.gif

loader.gif

1512 ms

revicons.woff

revicons.woff

1557 ms

js

js

58 ms

Accessibility Review

adepth.in accessibility score

84

Accessibility Issues

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

adepth.in best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

adepth.in SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Adepth.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Adepth.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

adepth.in

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Adepth. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: