Tools & Wizards About Us
admissionreport.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 54

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    71% of other websites

  • 88

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 68% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    20% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

admissionreport.com

Acceptance rates to graduate programs in the United Kingdom

Page Load Speed

1.3 sec in total

First Response

43 ms

Resources Loaded

838 ms

Page Rendered

380 ms

admissionreport.com screenshot

About Website

Visit admissionreport.com now to see the best up-to-date Admissionreport content for United Kingdom and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about admissionreport.com

The best source of information about acceptance rates to Masters and PhD programs in the United Kingdom.

Visit admissionreport.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Admissionreport.com page load time and found that the first response time was 43 ms and then it took 1.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

admissionreport.com performance score

54

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.6 s

65/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.0 s

13/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.6 s

87/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value450 ms

62/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.023

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.7 s

22/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

admissionreport.com

43 ms

admissionreport.com

125 ms

www.admissionreport.com

149 ms

js

136 ms

bootstrap.min.css

19 ms

Our browser made a total of 55 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 84% of them (46 requests) were addressed to the original Admissionreport.com, 9% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (277 ms) relates to the external source Beacon.errorception.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 86.0 kB (7%)

Content Size

1.3 MB

After Optimization

1.2 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Admissionreport.com main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-92%

Potential reduce by 85.2 kB

  • Original 92.3 kB
  • After minification 54.3 kB
  • After compression 7.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 38.0 kB, which is 41% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 85.2 kB or 92% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 1 B

  • Original 1.1 MB
  • After minification 1.1 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Admissionreport images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 783 B

  • Original 72.0 kB
  • After minification 72.0 kB
  • After compression 71.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 94 B

  • Original 72.9 kB
  • After minification 72.9 kB
  • After compression 72.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Admissionreport.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 12 (28%)

Requests Now

43

After Optimization

31

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 43 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Admissionreport. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

admissionreport.com

admissionreport.com

43 ms

admissionreport.com

admissionreport.com

125 ms

www.admissionreport.com

www.admissionreport.com

149 ms

js

js

136 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

19 ms

style.css

style.css

35 ms

blog.css

blog.css

28 ms

custom.css

custom.css

64 ms

modernizr.js

modernizr.js

32 ms

ads-1654.js

ads-1654.js

52 ms

all_icons.min.css

all_icons.min.css

33 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

30 ms

css

css

45 ms

email-decode.min.js

email-decode.min.js

30 ms

common_scripts.js

common_scripts.js

58 ms

functions.js

functions.js

43 ms

common.js

common.js

44 ms

logo_bright.png

logo_bright.png

26 ms

logo.png

logo.png

95 ms

front_image.jpg

front_image.jpg

35 ms

search.svg

search.svg

103 ms

university-college-london.jpg

university-college-london.jpg

24 ms

london-school-of-economics.jpg

london-school-of-economics.jpg

26 ms

imperial-college-london.jpg

imperial-college-london.jpg

40 ms

university-of-cambridge.jpg

university-of-cambridge.jpg

27 ms

kings-college-london.jpg

kings-college-london.jpg

51 ms

university-of-oxford.jpg

university-of-oxford.jpg

45 ms

university-of-edinburgh.jpg

university-of-edinburgh.jpg

52 ms

university-of-manchester.jpg

university-of-manchester.jpg

53 ms

university-of-durham.jpg

university-of-durham.jpg

56 ms

university-of-warwick.jpg

university-of-warwick.jpg

56 ms

university-of-st-andrews.jpg

university-of-st-andrews.jpg

67 ms

university-of-nottingham.jpg

university-of-nottingham.jpg

67 ms

eth-zurich.jpg

eth-zurich.jpg

69 ms

dartmouth-college.jpg

dartmouth-college.jpg

73 ms

avatar.jpg

avatar.jpg

80 ms

university-of-bristol.jpg

university-of-bristol.jpg

79 ms

university-of-liverpool.jpg

university-of-liverpool.jpg

84 ms

university-of-leeds.jpg

university-of-leeds.jpg

89 ms

university-of-exeter.jpg

university-of-exeter.jpg

94 ms

university-of-bath.jpg

university-of-bath.jpg

93 ms

brunel-university-london.jpg

brunel-university-london.jpg

102 ms

university-of-cardiff.jpg

university-of-cardiff.jpg

112 ms

university-of-sheffield.jpg

university-of-sheffield.jpg

106 ms

university-of-glasgow.jpg

university-of-glasgow.jpg

110 ms

pattern.svg

pattern.svg

113 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9Z1xlEw.woff

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9Z1xlEw.woff

26 ms

pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJfedA.woff

pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJfedA.woff

31 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8Z1xlEw.woff

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8Z1xlEw.woff

37 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6Z1xlEw.woff

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6Z1xlEw.woff

37 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7Z1xlEw.woff

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7Z1xlEw.woff

43 ms

5ed3ed2d9cf1e33d7913b116.js

5ed3ed2d9cf1e33d7913b116.js

277 ms

ElegantIcons.woff

ElegantIcons.woff

143 ms

Pe-icon-7-stroke.woff

Pe-icon-7-stroke.woff

103 ms

themify.woff

themify.woff

133 ms

Accessibility Review

admissionreport.com accessibility score

88

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA IDs are not unique

Best Practices

admissionreport.com best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

admissionreport.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Admissionreport.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Admissionreport.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

admissionreport.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Admissionreport. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: