3.6 sec in total
198 ms
2.8 sec
594 ms
Visit adobe.it now to see the best up-to-date Adobe content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about adobe.it
Adobe sta rivoluzionando il mondo attraverso le esperienze digitali. Aiutiamo i nostri clienti a creare, distribuire e ottimizzare contenuti e applicazioni.
Visit adobe.itWe analyzed Adobe.it page load time and found that the first response time was 198 ms and then it took 3.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
adobe.it performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.5 s
65/100
10%
Value4.3 s
42/100
25%
Value3.8 s
84/100
10%
Value70 ms
99/100
30%
Value0.009
100/100
15%
Value6.3 s
61/100
10%
198 ms
84 ms
103 ms
112 ms
155 ms
Our browser made a total of 48 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Adobe.it, 23% (11 requests) were made to Wwwimages.adobe.com and 15% (7 requests) were made to Assets.adobedtm.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (404 ms) relates to the external source Ims-na1.adobelogin.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.7 MB (74%)
2.3 MB
601.3 kB
In fact, the total size of Adobe.it main page is 2.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 74.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 14.6 kB, which is 17% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 74.2 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 24 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Adobe needs image optimization as it can save up to 24 B or 13% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 1.1 MB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 1.1 MB or 71% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 558.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Adobe.it needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 558.2 kB or 81% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 33 (80%)
41
8
The browser has sent 41 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Adobe. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 29 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
adobe.it
198 ms
84 ms
adobe.min.fp-0edeb5113139ff2cefc20f4fee3fabb2.css
103 ms
aceui-reimagine.min.css.fps.fp-09ff3415eb886a39592cb164b876ba57.css
112 ms
thirdparty-new.min.fp-c24078be2ad301563ba7d6eb90204ef3.css
155 ms
customized.min.fp-c956cc3ba17807ea6268e65b44215324.css
110 ms
satelliteLib-46e65db5bb0c375f8f64619be31cc9b29acf4867.js
18 ms
adobe-head.min.fp-57e4ecdefdd35acf2e2428c1b3e57750.js
109 ms
whd3raw.js
269 ms
aceui-reimagine.min.js.fps.fp-66afa8924d10267b19bfe6d6b705bb54.js
264 ms
gnav.js
75 ms
reimagined.js
70 ms
ims.js
74 ms
thirdparty-new.min.fp-1c58c072e9c34f24ddfa8b91880e0251.js
260 ms
adobe.min.fp-14299fb3dd0f87de5a79fa90b6a48703.js
262 ms
mbox-contents-f3808f72f280c66c15bd81363d6f55f0659a684d.js
46 ms
dil-contents-fe044508f2e9fdd5937011e33188cb0afb585dac.js
64 ms
ip.json
75 ms
ip.json
79 ms
rd
32 ms
target.js
43 ms
id
35 ms
ajax
17 ms
id
99 ms
107 ms
d
385 ms
7463573.png
104 ms
standard
75 ms
AtxykX8AAA==
58 ms
8FHSxoZQA=
55 ms
BR0saGUA
36 ms
BR0saGUA
24 ms
aceui-fonts.woff
85 ms
p.gif
333 ms
globalnav.css
25 ms
globalnav.js
63 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
185 ms
imslib.min.js
99 ms
globalnav.js
43 ms
token
176 ms
standard
134 ms
wrapper.js
159 ms
satellite-55e442fd3961370014000784.js
146 ms
satellite-5627261764746d716d001396.js
145 ms
satellite-55c1c0a93261650425000295.js
144 ms
satellite-565f3e0c64746d342a002ac9.js
142 ms
favicon.ico
404 ms
298 ms
adobe.it accessibility score
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
adobe.it best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
adobe.it SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
IT
IT
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Adobe.it can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Italian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Adobe.it main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
adobe.it
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Adobe. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: