3.8 sec in total
253 ms
3.3 sec
207 ms
Visit advent.es now to see the best up-to-date Advent content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about advent.es
Get the most out of your digital marketing opportunities with our integrated approach to online presence building. Contact us for expert guidance.
Visit advent.esWe analyzed Advent.es page load time and found that the first response time was 253 ms and then it took 3.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
advent.es performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value12.1 s
0/100
10%
Value24.6 s
0/100
25%
Value21.7 s
0/100
10%
Value3,240 ms
2/100
30%
Value0.374
28/100
15%
Value25.4 s
0/100
10%
253 ms
1023 ms
260 ms
585 ms
351 ms
Our browser made a total of 89 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 75% of them (67 requests) were addressed to the original Advent.es, 9% (8 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 6% (5 requests) were made to Maps.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Advent.es.
Page size can be reduced by 1.6 MB (65%)
2.5 MB
868.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Advent.es main page is 2.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 70.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 70.4 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 3 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Advent images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 684.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 684.9 kB or 52% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 836.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Advent.es needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 836.1 kB or 88% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 65 (83%)
78
13
The browser has sent 78 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Advent. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 48 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 19 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
advent.es
253 ms
advent.es
1023 ms
layerslider.css
260 ms
style.min.css
585 ms
upcoming-appointments.css
351 ms
ssa-styles.css
345 ms
style.css
437 ms
font-awesome.min.css
435 ms
slider.css
345 ms
responsive.css
436 ms
animate.min.css
519 ms
slick.css
441 ms
slick-theme.css
529 ms
css
42 ms
css
61 ms
js_composer.min.css
1093 ms
formreset.min.css
545 ms
formsmain.min.css
703 ms
readyclass.min.css
640 ms
browsers.min.css
657 ms
jquery.min.js
796 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
711 ms
layerslider.utils.js
947 ms
layerslider.kreaturamedia.jquery.js
1022 ms
layerslider.transitions.js
966 ms
js
80 ms
jquery.json.min.js
958 ms
gravityforms.min.js
878 ms
api.js
38 ms
utils.min.js
977 ms
animate.min.css
1012 ms
smoothscroll.js
1006 ms
jquery.nivo.slider.pack.js
1016 ms
abcbiz-stickyheader.js
1006 ms
parallax.min.js
1078 ms
abcbiz-animate.min.js
1117 ms
abcbiz-carousel.js
1117 ms
abc-bg-video.js
1116 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
1116 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
1116 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
1168 ms
dom-ready.min.js
1392 ms
hooks.min.js
1220 ms
i18n.min.js
1128 ms
a11y.min.js
1134 ms
underscore.min.js
1129 ms
customize-base.min.js
1039 ms
customize-preview.min.js
1117 ms
abcbiz-customizer.js
1132 ms
progress-bar.min.js
1117 ms
waypoints.min.js
1070 ms
abc-counterup.min.js
1062 ms
abcfilter.js
1014 ms
slick.min.js
1068 ms
abcbiz-custom.js
1008 ms
jquery.appear.js
991 ms
comment-reply.min.js
959 ms
vendor-theme.min.js
968 ms
scripts-theme.min.js
880 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
934 ms
vc-waypoints.min.js
792 ms
56pksostor
187 ms
gtm.js
102 ms
advent.png
727 ms
logo-DEF.jpg
777 ms
internet.jpg
726 ms
advent_white.png
776 ms
chris-liverani-HUJDz6CJEaM-unsplash-200x200.jpg
791 ms
1746-200x200.webp
795 ms
google_pill-200x200.jpg
811 ms
google_partner.jpg
810 ms
GoldPE_EN.jpg
820 ms
S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWA.woff
66 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwiPHw.woff
86 ms
S6u8w4BMUTPHh30AXC-s.woff
101 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwiPHw.woff
102 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
899 ms
embed
166 ms
clarity.js
14 ms
js
17 ms
search.js
4 ms
geometry.js
8 ms
main.js
11 ms
recaptcha__en_gb.js
57 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVQ.woff
45 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVQ.woff
46 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVQ.woff
45 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVQ.woff
46 ms
c.gif
7 ms
advent.es accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Links do not have a discernible name
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
advent.es best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
advent.es SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Advent.es can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Advent.es main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
advent.es
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Advent. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: