Tools & Wizards About Us
aerialfit.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 56

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    72% of other websites

  • 93

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 80% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

aerialfit.com

Aerial Fit® | Aerial and Circus Arts Classes in Charleston SC.

Page Load Speed

2.6 sec in total

First Response

665 ms

Resources Loaded

1.7 sec

Page Rendered

172 ms

aerialfit.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Aerial Fit content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about aerialfit.com

YES, YOU CAN DO THIS. Fly high feeling victorious in your very first class – our instructors will inspire you to tap into strength you never knew you had.

Visit aerialfit.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Aerialfit.com page load time and found that the first response time was 665 ms and then it took 1.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

aerialfit.com performance score

56

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.3 s

40/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.2 s

11/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.9 s

48/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value200 ms

89/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.001

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.9 s

27/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

aerialfit.com

665 ms

cleantalk-public.min.css

17 ms

public.css

27 ms

theme.min.css

32 ms

style.css

39 ms

Our browser made a total of 57 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 86% of them (49 requests) were addressed to the original Aerialfit.com, 4% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (665 ms) belongs to the original domain Aerialfit.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 81.4 kB (8%)

Content Size

1.0 MB

After Optimization

946.3 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Aerialfit.com main page is 1.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 719.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 78.5 kB

  • Original 97.6 kB
  • After minification 94.8 kB
  • After compression 19.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 78.5 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 97 B

  • Original 719.4 kB
  • After minification 719.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Aerial Fit images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 1.2 kB

  • Original 168.1 kB
  • After minification 168.1 kB
  • After compression 166.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 1.6 kB

  • Original 42.5 kB
  • After minification 42.2 kB
  • After compression 41.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Aerialfit.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 44 (80%)

Requests Now

55

After Optimization

11

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 55 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Aerial Fit. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 27 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 19 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

aerialfit.com

aerialfit.com

665 ms

cleantalk-public.min.css

cleantalk-public.min.css

17 ms

public.css

public.css

27 ms

theme.min.css

theme.min.css

32 ms

style.css

style.css

39 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

35 ms

frontend-lite.min.css

frontend-lite.min.css

27 ms

swiper.min.css

swiper.min.css

32 ms

post-14678.css

post-14678.css

38 ms

frontend-lite.min.css

frontend-lite.min.css

41 ms

post-14214.css

post-14214.css

40 ms

post-14229.css

post-14229.css

47 ms

post-14278.css

post-14278.css

65 ms

ecs-style.css

ecs-style.css

52 ms

post-15057.css

post-15057.css

55 ms

post-15290.css

post-15290.css

52 ms

css

css

41 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

56 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

76 ms

apbct-public-bundle.min.js

apbct-public-bundle.min.js

75 ms

ct-bot-detector-wrapper.js

ct-bot-detector-wrapper.js

296 ms

page-transitions.min.js

page-transitions.min.js

73 ms

ecs_ajax_pagination.js

ecs_ajax_pagination.js

82 ms

ecs.js

ecs.js

82 ms

widget-nav-menu.min.css

widget-nav-menu.min.css

84 ms

widget-posts.min.css

widget-posts.min.css

82 ms

animations.min.css

animations.min.css

100 ms

stripe-handler-ng.js

stripe-handler-ng.js

82 ms

instant-page.min.js

instant-page.min.js

82 ms

jquery.smartmenus.min.js

jquery.smartmenus.min.js

85 ms

imagesloaded.min.js

imagesloaded.min.js

86 ms

webpack.runtime.min.js

webpack.runtime.min.js

99 ms

frontend-modules.min.js

frontend-modules.min.js

113 ms

waypoints.min.js

waypoints.min.js

94 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

97 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

100 ms

ecspro.js

ecspro.js

105 ms

webpack-pro.runtime.min.js

webpack-pro.runtime.min.js

110 ms

2f12f0b150.js

2f12f0b150.js

58 ms

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

108 ms

regenerator-runtime.min.js

regenerator-runtime.min.js

101 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

93 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

92 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

95 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

95 ms

elements-handlers.min.js

elements-handlers.min.js

101 ms

Aerial-Fit-R-Retina.png

Aerial-Fit-R-Retina.png

71 ms

f52ad2761a302ae07c7f71f3aa9a4c5d.gif

f52ad2761a302ae07c7f71f3aa9a4c5d.gif

294 ms

Students-in-the-Air.jpg

Students-in-the-Air.jpg

71 ms

Inside-Out-768x432.jpg

Inside-Out-768x432.jpg

301 ms

84106296_2855414507881266_3518134443753603072_n-768x432.jpg

84106296_2855414507881266_3518134443753603072_n-768x432.jpg

292 ms

winter-intensive-2019-1024x576-768x432.jpg

winter-intensive-2019-1024x576-768x432.jpg

70 ms

71761041_684080938773687_2212843313554259968_n-1024x576-768x432.jpg

71761041_684080938773687_2212843313554259968_n-1024x576-768x432.jpg

69 ms

font

font

25 ms

font

font

32 ms

embed

embed

347 ms

js

js

27 ms

Accessibility Review

aerialfit.com accessibility score

93

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

aerialfit.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

aerialfit.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Aerialfit.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Aerialfit.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

aerialfit.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Aerial Fit. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: