Tools & Wizards About Us
afly.in screenshot

Report Summary

  • 24

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    43% of other websites

  • 87

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 66% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

afly.in

AFLY INDIA - Digital Services Agency

Page Load Speed

3.7 sec in total

First Response

30 ms

Resources Loaded

2.8 sec

Page Rendered

852 ms

afly.in screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing AFLY content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about afly.in

We offer a range of services including website development, video editing, thumbnail design, backlink provision, domain authority enhancement, and more.

Visit afly.in

Key Findings

We analyzed Afly.in page load time and found that the first response time was 30 ms and then it took 3.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

afly.in performance score

24

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.6 s

63/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.3 s

2/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.7 s

11/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value970 ms

28/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.297

40/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.8 s

13/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

afly.in

30 ms

afly.in

1140 ms

css2

47 ms

language-public.css

20 ms

contact-public.css

41 ms

Our browser made a total of 83 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 96% of them (80 requests) were addressed to the original Afly.in, 2% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Static.cloudflareinsights.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Afly.in.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 187.0 kB (9%)

Content Size

2.2 MB

After Optimization

2.0 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Afly.in main page is 2.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 33.5 kB

  • Original 41.4 kB
  • After minification 41.4 kB
  • After compression 7.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 33.5 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-8%

Potential reduce by 151.5 kB

  • Original 1.8 MB
  • After minification 1.7 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. AFLY images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 1.5 kB

  • Original 197.3 kB
  • After minification 197.3 kB
  • After compression 195.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 498 B

  • Original 84.6 kB
  • After minification 84.6 kB
  • After compression 84.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Afly.in has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 46 (61%)

Requests Now

76

After Optimization

30

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 76 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of AFLY. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 29 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 19 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

afly.in

afly.in

30 ms

afly.in

afly.in

1140 ms

css2

css2

47 ms

language-public.css

language-public.css

20 ms

contact-public.css

contact-public.css

41 ms

cookie-consent.css

cookie-consent.css

37 ms

content-styles.css

content-styles.css

38 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

29 ms

default.css

default.css

22 ms

magnific-popup.css

magnific-popup.css

39 ms

fontawesome-all.min.css

fontawesome-all.min.css

40 ms

flaticon.css

flaticon.css

53 ms

odometer.css

odometer.css

50 ms

jarallax.css

jarallax.css

54 ms

swiper-bundle.min.css

swiper-bundle.min.css

55 ms

slick.css

slick.css

52 ms

toastr.min.css

toastr.min.css

58 ms

style.css

style.css

69 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

64 ms

aos.css

aos.css

62 ms

email-decode.min.js

email-decode.min.js

53 ms

jquery-3.7.1.min.js

jquery-3.7.1.min.js

234 ms

bootstrap.bundle.min.js

bootstrap.bundle.min.js

292 ms

jarallax.min.js

jarallax.min.js

230 ms

jquery.magnific-popup.min.js

jquery.magnific-popup.min.js

238 ms

jquery.odometer.min.js

jquery.odometer.min.js

292 ms

slick.min.js

slick.min.js

291 ms

swiper-bundle.min.js

swiper-bundle.min.js

444 ms

ajax-form.js

ajax-form.js

420 ms

jquery.appear.js

jquery.appear.js

423 ms

jquery.easypiechart.min.js

jquery.easypiechart.min.js

291 ms

jquery.inview.min.js

jquery.inview.min.js

417 ms

jquery.parallaxScroll.min.js

jquery.parallaxScroll.min.js

424 ms

particles.min.js

particles.min.js

430 ms

ScrollTrigger.js

ScrollTrigger.js

594 ms

SplitText.js

SplitText.js

608 ms

wow.min.js

wow.min.js

606 ms

toastr.min.js

toastr.min.js

628 ms

vcd15cbe7772f49c399c6a5babf22c1241717689176015

vcd15cbe7772f49c399c6a5babf22c1241717689176015

74 ms

script.js

script.js

616 ms

main.js

main.js

624 ms

gsap.js

gsap.js

752 ms

aos.js

aos.js

770 ms

gsap-animation.js

gsap-animation.js

769 ms

language-public.js

language-public.js

770 ms

contact-public.js

contact-public.js

799 ms

cookie-consent.js

cookie-consent.js

775 ms

rocket-loader.min.js

rocket-loader.min.js

735 ms

afly-run.png

afly-run.png

752 ms

banner-main-img-1.png

banner-main-img-1.png

753 ms

banner-shape01.png

banner-shape01.png

757 ms

banner-shape02.png

banner-shape02.png

753 ms

banner-shape05.png

banner-shape05.png

758 ms

b3.png

b3.png

759 ms

about-shape02.png

about-shape02.png

757 ms

rashed.png

rashed.png

765 ms

css2

css2

21 ms

rizan.png

rizan.png

744 ms

trax.png

trax.png

753 ms

4-4.png

4-4.png

596 ms

banner-1.png

banner-1.png

601 ms

desin.png

desin.png

591 ms

ra.png

ra.png

548 ms

domain.png

domain.png

550 ms

logo-2.png

logo-2.png

551 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

893 ms

fa-regular-400.woff

fa-regular-400.woff

710 ms

flaticon.woff

flaticon.woff

672 ms

fa-brands-400.woff

fa-brands-400.woff

742 ms

uuyr.png

uuyr.png

436 ms

about-shape06.png

about-shape06.png

421 ms

testimonial-shape04.png

testimonial-shape04.png

417 ms

quote.png

quote.png

283 ms

e.png

e.png

264 ms

f.png

f.png

273 ms

ain.png

ain.png

273 ms

wa.png

wa.png

264 ms

baner1-280x180.jpg

baner1-280x180.jpg

291 ms

blog2-280x180.jpg

blog2-280x180.jpg

147 ms

blog3-280x180.jpg

blog3-280x180.jpg

129 ms

right-arrow.svg

right-arrow.svg

360 ms

afly.in

afly.in

464 ms

jquery-3.7.1.min.js

jquery-3.7.1.min.js

19 ms

Accessibility Review

afly.in accessibility score

87

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

afly.in best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

afly.in SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Afly.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Afly.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

afly.in

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of AFLY. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: