6.7 sec in total
763 ms
5.7 sec
190 ms
Welcome to afv.group homepage info - get ready to check AFV best content right away, or after learning these important things about afv.group
To participate and promote the capital market and equity funding to assist SME/SMI growth. AFV spur the exponential growth of the business eco-system
Visit afv.groupWe analyzed Afv.group page load time and found that the first response time was 763 ms and then it took 5.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
afv.group performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value9.8 s
0/100
10%
Value13.5 s
0/100
25%
Value15.4 s
1/100
10%
Value120 ms
97/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value14.8 s
8/100
10%
763 ms
2451 ms
39 ms
965 ms
72 ms
Our browser made a total of 61 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 72% of them (44 requests) were addressed to the original Afv.group, 15% (9 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 5% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Afv.group.
Page size can be reduced by 1.2 MB (72%)
1.7 MB
482.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Afv.group main page is 1.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 773.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 80.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 80.8 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 42.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, AFV needs image optimization as it can save up to 42.0 kB or 20% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 406.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 406.6 kB or 66% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 688.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Afv.group needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 688.8 kB or 89% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 31 (65%)
48
17
The browser has sent 48 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of AFV. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
afv.group
763 ms
www.afv.group
2451 ms
css
39 ms
layerslider.css
965 ms
css
72 ms
styles.css
725 ms
font-awesome.min.css
972 ms
basic.css
731 ms
grid.css
733 ms
theme-style.css
1499 ms
elements.css
1451 ms
responsive.css
1223 ms
js_composer.min.css
1722 ms
css
71 ms
greensock.js
1453 ms
jquery.js
1701 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
1473 ms
layerslider.kreaturamedia.jquery.js
1698 ms
layerslider.transitions.js
1702 ms
modernizr.custom.js
1776 ms
analytics.js
39 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
1738 ms
collect
13 ms
js
52 ms
jquery.form.min.js
1479 ms
scripts.js
1482 ms
smoothscrolling.js
1479 ms
plugins.js
1493 ms
smartresize.js
1491 ms
isotope.pkgd.min.js
1535 ms
packery-mode.pkgd.min.js
1728 ms
main.js
1728 ms
wp-embed.min.js
1738 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
1748 ms
ga.js
69 ms
logo-color.png
468 ms
logo-dark.png
475 ms
logo-light.png
653 ms
logo-color-b.png
657 ms
pie-01.png
667 ms
pie-02.png
679 ms
expertise-chart.png
690 ms
learning.png
733 ms
startups-1.png
906 ms
talent.png
910 ms
investor.png
919 ms
background02.jpg
902 ms
background-wrap.jpg
916 ms
OpNCnoEOns3V7GcOrgg.woff
61 ms
OpNPnoEOns3V7G-ljBvTpik.woff
79 ms
OpNPnoEOns3V7G_RihvTpik.woff
80 ms
OpNPnoEOns3V7G-1ixvTpik.woff
80 ms
OpNPnoEOns3V7G-piBvTpik.woff
79 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
975 ms
osmosis.woff
1119 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVQ.woff
19 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4gaVQ.woff
26 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVQ.woff
30 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVQ.woff
42 ms
__utm.gif
16 ms
skin.css
722 ms
afv.group accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
afv.group best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
afv.group SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Afv.group can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Afv.group main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
afv.group
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of AFV. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: