5.8 sec in total
75 ms
5 sec
782 ms
Visit agemark.com now to see the best up-to-date Agemark content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about agemark.com
Agemark Senior Living is a family-owned senior living provider with a successful track record of providing quality lifestyles to seniors and their families across the country.
Visit agemark.comWe analyzed Agemark.com page load time and found that the first response time was 75 ms and then it took 5.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
agemark.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value7.5 s
1/100
10%
Value20.8 s
0/100
25%
Value22.1 s
0/100
10%
Value9,030 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.858
4/100
15%
Value22.4 s
1/100
10%
75 ms
1701 ms
37 ms
43 ms
47 ms
Our browser made a total of 82 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 72% of them (59 requests) were addressed to the original Agemark.com, 9% (7 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 5% (4 requests) were made to F.vimeocdn.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Agemark.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.3 MB (29%)
4.3 MB
3.0 MB
In fact, the total size of Agemark.com main page is 4.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 2.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 85.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 85.3 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 40.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Agemark images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 380.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 380.4 kB or 67% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 750.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Agemark.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 750.5 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 49 (72%)
68
19
The browser has sent 68 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Agemark. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 34 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 17 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
agemark.com
75 ms
www.agemark.com
1701 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
37 ms
slick.css
43 ms
style.css
47 ms
events_manager.css
63 ms
events-manager-pro.css
68 ms
styles.min.css
66 ms
style.css
67 ms
css
64 ms
dashicons.min.css
70 ms
style.css
80 ms
colorbox.css
81 ms
jquery.js
85 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
87 ms
slick.min.js
89 ms
core.min.js
93 ms
widget.min.js
95 ms
position.min.js
96 ms
mouse.min.js
98 ms
sortable.min.js
101 ms
datepicker.min.js
103 ms
menu.min.js
104 ms
wp-a11y.min.js
106 ms
autocomplete.min.js
107 ms
resizable.min.js
109 ms
draggable.min.js
111 ms
button.min.js
113 ms
dialog.min.js
114 ms
events-manager.js
117 ms
events-manager-pro.js
120 ms
preloader-script.js
121 ms
cscript.js
122 ms
jquery.colorbox-min.js
125 ms
font-awesome.min.css
59 ms
css
72 ms
et-core-unified-15459302715325.min.css
126 ms
style.css
82 ms
js
273 ms
display-structure.css
176 ms
display-structure.css
175 ms
custom.min.js
176 ms
common.js
175 ms
wp-embed.min.js
175 ms
underscore.min.js
184 ms
backbone.min.js
183 ms
front-end-deps.js
210 ms
front-end.js
201 ms
front-end.js
201 ms
front-end.js
198 ms
nav.png
198 ms
agemark-logo.png
198 ms
agemark-logo-300x75.png
198 ms
188179307
245 ms
S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWA.woff
759 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwiPHw.woff
843 ms
S6u8w4BMUTPHh30AXC-s.woff
751 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwiPHw.woff
833 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh50XSwiPHw.woff
825 ms
co3WmX5slCNuHLi8bLeY9MK7whWMhyjYrEPzvD-KzhU.woff
826 ms
co3YmX5slCNuHLi8bLeY9MK7whWMhyjQEl5fvg-O.woff
825 ms
modules.ttf
214 ms
3.gif
662 ms
Slider_image2_WEB.jpg
611 ms
COPY-GBCountryHouse_WR_0B5B2651-e1502288662985.jpg
612 ms
Oakdale-BA-Horse1_AGMKCTA.jpg
609 ms
CHCumb-20160822125358_IMG_0565_AGMKCTA.jpg
611 ms
CHLInc3-Spring_AGMKCTAs.jpg
621 ms
CHLinc3-Gert2.jpg
809 ms
AG_w-TracyCalAugDSC01847_AGMKLIFE.jpg
621 ms
598162888.jpg
199 ms
player.js
197 ms
player.css
196 ms
Slider_image2_mobile.jpg
421 ms
188179307
407 ms
analytics.js
510 ms
598162888.jpg
213 ms
player.js
203 ms
player.css
192 ms
collect
156 ms
collect
110 ms
defaults-blue_60x60.png
37 ms
agemark.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
agemark.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
agemark.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Agemark.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Agemark.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
agemark.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Agemark. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: