2.7 sec in total
80 ms
2.1 sec
533 ms
Visit agiledevteam.com now to see the best up-to-date Agile Dev Team content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about agiledevteam.com
We believe that company values start from the leadership team. We are technical, honest, enthusiastic, innovative and always striving to improve.
Visit agiledevteam.comWe analyzed Agiledevteam.com page load time and found that the first response time was 80 ms and then it took 2.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
agiledevteam.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.9 s
24/100
10%
Value12.0 s
0/100
25%
Value9.0 s
14/100
10%
Value550 ms
54/100
30%
Value0.018
100/100
15%
Value13.5 s
11/100
10%
80 ms
837 ms
85 ms
127 ms
32 ms
Our browser made a total of 76 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 88% of them (67 requests) were addressed to the original Agiledevteam.com, 8% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (837 ms) belongs to the original domain Agiledevteam.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.1 MB (47%)
2.2 MB
1.2 MB
In fact, the total size of Agiledevteam.com main page is 2.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. CSS take 986.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 185.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 185.9 kB or 86% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 6.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Agile Dev Team images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 63.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 63.8 kB or 18% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 796.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Agiledevteam.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 796.8 kB or 81% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 44 (73%)
60
16
The browser has sent 60 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Agile Dev Team. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 32 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 14 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
agiledevteam.com
80 ms
agiledevteam.com
837 ms
gtm.js
85 ms
js
127 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
32 ms
style.min.css
67 ms
styles.css
75 ms
mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css
77 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.css
75 ms
rgs.css
76 ms
font-awesome.min.css
78 ms
style.css
143 ms
magnific.css
108 ms
responsive.css
130 ms
iconsmind.css
126 ms
ascend.css
108 ms
js_composer.min.css
111 ms
css
33 ms
jquery.js
196 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
129 ms
modernizr.js
136 ms
animate.min.css
302 ms
core.min.js
301 ms
widget.min.js
302 ms
position.min.js
326 ms
menu.min.js
325 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
327 ms
dom-ready.min.js
325 ms
a11y.min.js
326 ms
autocomplete.min.js
326 ms
wpss-search-suggest.js
327 ms
scripts.js
327 ms
magnific.js
412 ms
superfish.js
409 ms
init.js
415 ms
infinitescroll.js
410 ms
mediaelement-and-player.min.js
410 ms
mediaelement-migrate.min.js
410 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.js
411 ms
flickity.min.js
411 ms
jquery.flexslider-min.js
412 ms
stickkit.js
389 ms
touchswipe.min.js
354 ms
wp-embed.min.js
347 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
348 ms
logo11111.png
121 ms
spacex_home_3.jpg
123 ms
nearshore_2.jpg
124 ms
skills_2.jpg
124 ms
cl1-min.png
119 ms
cl2-min.png
118 ms
cl3-min.png
121 ms
cl4-min.png
120 ms
cl5-min.png
121 ms
cl6-min.png
124 ms
case_2.jpg
136 ms
agiledevteam.com
637 ms
contact_4.jpg
123 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxM.woff
62 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc-.woff
61 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc-.woff
97 ms
XRXI3I6Li01BKofiOc5wtlZ2di8HDOUhdTQ3iQ.woff
117 ms
XRXI3I6Li01BKofiOc5wtlZ2di8HDFwmdTQ3iQ.woff
117 ms
icomoon.woff
59 ms
OpenSans-Semibold-webfont.woff
59 ms
OpenSansBold-webfont.woff
59 ms
OpenSans-Regular-webfont.woff
59 ms
OpenSans-Light-webfont.woff
59 ms
steadysets.ttf
96 ms
iconsmind.ttf
178 ms
KFOkCnqEu92Fr1Mu51xIIzQ.woff
116 ms
wp-polyfill-fetch.min.js
92 ms
wp-polyfill-formdata.min.js
94 ms
wp-polyfill-element-closest.min.js
93 ms
fontawesome-webfont.svg
97 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
29 ms
agiledevteam.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
agiledevteam.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
agiledevteam.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Agiledevteam.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Agiledevteam.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
agiledevteam.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Agile Dev Team. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: