2.9 sec in total
461 ms
2.1 sec
368 ms
Click here to check amazing AGIVEO content for Russia. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about agiveo.net
Бесплатный футбольный онлайн менеджер с реальными клубами и реальными футболистами с несколькими интересными режимами игры.
Visit agiveo.netWe analyzed Agiveo.net page load time and found that the first response time was 461 ms and then it took 2.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
agiveo.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.6 s
64/100
10%
Value4.8 s
31/100
25%
Value2.7 s
96/100
10%
Value20 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.085
93/100
15%
Value3.5 s
92/100
10%
461 ms
115 ms
227 ms
227 ms
121 ms
Our browser made a total of 29 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 45% of them (13 requests) were addressed to the original Agiveo.net, 14% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 7% (2 requests) were made to Maxcdn.bootstrapcdn.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) relates to the external source Counter.wapstart.ru.
Page size can be reduced by 272.4 kB (51%)
529.8 kB
257.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Agiveo.net main page is 529.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 249.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 14.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 14.9 kB or 72% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 3.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. AGIVEO images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 44.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 44.6 kB or 68% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 209.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Agiveo.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 209.8 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 10 (48%)
21
11
The browser has sent 21 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of AGIVEO. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
agiveo.net
461 ms
font-awesome.min.css
115 ms
metisMenu.min.css
227 ms
animate.min.css
227 ms
bootstrap.min.css
121 ms
style.min.css
235 ms
jquery-1.11.2.min.js
335 ms
bootstrap.min.js
114 ms
metisMenu.min.js
226 ms
emojify.min.js
231 ms
strength.min.js
230 ms
app.min.js
364 ms
logo.png
461 ms
css
36 ms
watch.js
55 ms
blue_rus.gif
261 ms
374408.cnt
474 ms
9017.gif
398 ms
index.php
1171 ms
bg1.png
600 ms
attestat.gif
132 ms
hit
268 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
48 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTYnF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
49 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSonF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
54 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzInF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
107 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
367 ms
hit
130 ms
index.php
162 ms
agiveo.net accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
agiveo.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
agiveo.net SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
RU
RU
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Agiveo.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Agiveo.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
agiveo.net
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of AGIVEO. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: