Tools & Wizards About Us
agm.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 16

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    30% of other websites

  • 88

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 68% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 85

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    55% of websites

agm.com

Home | Apollo Global Management

Page Load Speed

1.5 sec in total

First Response

95 ms

Resources Loaded

722 ms

Page Rendered

669 ms

agm.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Agm content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about agm.com

Home

Visit agm.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Agm.com page load time and found that the first response time was 95 ms and then it took 1.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

agm.com performance score

16

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.8 s

12/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value31.1 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value26.6 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value115,730 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.054

98/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value133.3 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

agm.com

95 ms

www.apollo.com

30 ms

cookieconsent.min.css

52 ms

cookieconsent.min.js

74 ms

clarip-cookie-manager.min.js

90 ms

Our browser made a total of 67 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Agm.com, 93% (62 requests) were made to Apollo.com and 4% (3 requests) were made to Cdn.clarip.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (328 ms) relates to the external source Apollo.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 486.2 kB (10%)

Content Size

5.0 MB

After Optimization

4.5 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Agm.com main page is 5.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 4.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-88%

Potential reduce by 116.3 kB

  • Original 131.7 kB
  • After minification 102.2 kB
  • After compression 15.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 29.6 kB, which is 22% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 116.3 kB or 88% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-8%

Potential reduce by 369.8 kB

  • Original 4.8 MB
  • After minification 4.5 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Agm images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 11 B

  • Original 12.1 kB
  • After minification 12.1 kB
  • After compression 12.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 8 B

  • Original 1.3 kB
  • After minification 1.3 kB
  • After compression 1.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Agm.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 19 (42%)

Requests Now

45

After Optimization

26

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 45 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Agm. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

agm.com

agm.com

95 ms

www.apollo.com

www.apollo.com

30 ms

cookieconsent.min.css

cookieconsent.min.css

52 ms

cookieconsent.min.js

cookieconsent.min.js

74 ms

clarip-cookie-manager.min.js

clarip-cookie-manager.min.js

90 ms

clientlib-base.lc-6dd8f31175d6bd8af599d45650bc1ac9-lc.min.css

clientlib-base.lc-6dd8f31175d6bd8af599d45650bc1ac9-lc.min.css

9 ms

clientlib-react.lc-6dc0c33785aedbc41b74f407eb846e3e-lc.min.css

clientlib-react.lc-6dc0c33785aedbc41b74f407eb846e3e-lc.min.css

25 ms

site-role-clientlibs.lc-ab3ffb40834ffdc97e7de3a1f9f75fdb-lc.min.js

site-role-clientlibs.lc-ab3ffb40834ffdc97e7de3a1f9f75fdb-lc.min.js

26 ms

clientlib-site.lc-c2d09590eabaf88ad4b29a33e8f1a532-lc.min.css

clientlib-site.lc-c2d09590eabaf88ad4b29a33e8f1a532-lc.min.css

25 ms

core.wcm.components.commons.datalayer.v2.lc-1e0136bad0acfb78be509234578e44f9-lc.min.js

core.wcm.components.commons.datalayer.v2.lc-1e0136bad0acfb78be509234578e44f9-lc.min.js

23 ms

core.wcm.components.commons.datalayer.acdl.lc-bf921af342fd2c40139671dbf0920a1f-lc.min.js

core.wcm.components.commons.datalayer.acdl.lc-bf921af342fd2c40139671dbf0920a1f-lc.min.js

29 ms

site-geolocation-clientlibs.lc-e5d2ebf75f12a14dad507ca8155201b9-lc.min.js

site-geolocation-clientlibs.lc-e5d2ebf75f12a14dad507ca8155201b9-lc.min.js

31 ms

clientlib-site.lc-0c7a0930079f5cb31025590467e9038c-lc.min.js

clientlib-site.lc-0c7a0930079f5cb31025590467e9038c-lc.min.js

53 ms

clientlib-react.lc-88329e352a18f0c3a0acaedb26765e5c-lc.min.js

clientlib-react.lc-88329e352a18f0c3a0acaedb26765e5c-lc.min.js

64 ms

container.lc-0a6aff292f5cc42142779cde92054524-lc.min.js

container.lc-0a6aff292f5cc42142779cde92054524-lc.min.js

29 ms

clientlib-base.lc-98b44ec74775c5bc76b0744df1c9b66c-lc.min.js

clientlib-base.lc-98b44ec74775c5bc76b0744df1c9b66c-lc.min.js

31 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

324 ms

roleAvatar.svg

roleAvatar.svg

177 ms

halfArrowBottom.svg

halfArrowBottom.svg

101 ms

hamMenu.svg

hamMenu.svg

100 ms

apollologo.svg

apollologo.svg

96 ms

Search.svg

Search.svg

105 ms

hertz-image.jpg

hertz-image.jpg

120 ms

Retirement_Piggy%20Bank_432px.png

Retirement_Piggy%20Bank_432px.png

112 ms

apollo-sustainability.jpg

apollo-sustainability.jpg

105 ms

Venetian-Resort.jpg

Venetian-Resort.jpg

136 ms

London_Wide_Compressed.jpg

London_Wide_Compressed.jpg

121 ms

pe-image-730x375-72.jpg

pe-image-730x375-72.jpg

120 ms

arrowRightBlackFill-32.svg

arrowRightBlackFill-32.svg

112 ms

APO%20Retirement_432px.png

APO%20Retirement_432px.png

124 ms

thumbnail_yahoo%202.png

thumbnail_yahoo%202.png

122 ms

Blue%20Windmill_432px.png

Blue%20Windmill_432px.png

125 ms

article-09-22-2022.jpg

article-09-22-2022.jpg

132 ms

apo-grey-background-16x9.png

apo-grey-background-16x9.png

123 ms

asia-pacific-apollo-overview.png

asia-pacific-apollo-overview.png

138 ms

apo-clay-background-16x9.png

apo-clay-background-16x9.png

132 ms

economic-club-recap-article-3.png

economic-club-recap-article-3.png

135 ms

private-ig-image-16x9.png

private-ig-image-16x9.png

139 ms

AbstractShapes2.png

AbstractShapes2.png

328 ms

Conceptual%20Image%20Earnings_880px.png

Conceptual%20Image%20Earnings_880px.png

153 ms

arrowRightWhiteFill-32.svg

arrowRightWhiteFill-32.svg

138 ms

arrowFullRightWhite.svg

arrowFullRightWhite.svg

147 ms

Rolling%20Green%20Hills_300px.jpg

Rolling%20Green%20Hills_300px.jpg

154 ms

arrow-right-off-white.svg

arrow-right-off-white.svg

148 ms

open_in_new.svg

open_in_new.svg

150 ms

Apollo%20Footer%20Logo.svg

Apollo%20Footer%20Logo.svg

154 ms

graph.png

graph.png

161 ms

GraphikRegular.otf

GraphikRegular.otf

70 ms

GraphikRegular.32974657.otf

GraphikRegular.32974657.otf

74 ms

GraphikMedium.otf

GraphikMedium.otf

74 ms

GraphikMedium.f58d53eb.otf

GraphikMedium.f58d53eb.otf

73 ms

GraphikSemibold.otf

GraphikSemibold.otf

75 ms

GraphikSemibold.7ef1e78a.otf

GraphikSemibold.7ef1e78a.otf

153 ms

Adobe-Garamond-Pro-Italic.ttf

Adobe-Garamond-Pro-Italic.ttf

146 ms

Adobe-Garamond-Pro-Italic.9a84e6aa.ttf

Adobe-Garamond-Pro-Italic.9a84e6aa.ttf

144 ms

Adobe-Garamond-Pro-Semibold-Italic.otf

Adobe-Garamond-Pro-Semibold-Italic.otf

150 ms

Adobe-Garamond-Pro-Semibold-Italic.df79643b.otf

Adobe-Garamond-Pro-Semibold-Italic.df79643b.otf

150 ms

Adobe-Garamond-Pro-Bold-Italic.ttf

Adobe-Garamond-Pro-Bold-Italic.ttf

144 ms

Adobe-Garamond-Pro-Bold-Italic.9b796f70.ttf

Adobe-Garamond-Pro-Bold-Italic.9b796f70.ttf

148 ms

Adobe-Garamond-Pro-Regular.ttf

Adobe-Garamond-Pro-Regular.ttf

134 ms

Adobe-Garamond-Pro-Regular.9b0413a8.ttf

Adobe-Garamond-Pro-Regular.9b0413a8.ttf

129 ms

Adobe-Garamond-Pro-Semibold.otf

Adobe-Garamond-Pro-Semibold.otf

138 ms

Adobe-Garamond-Pro-Semibold.b101bde8.otf

Adobe-Garamond-Pro-Semibold.b101bde8.otf

139 ms

Adobe-Garamond-Pro-Bold.ttf

Adobe-Garamond-Pro-Bold.ttf

139 ms

Adobe-Garamond-Pro-Bold.e2cb1ec4.ttf

Adobe-Garamond-Pro-Bold.e2cb1ec4.ttf

131 ms

Inter-Regular.ttf

Inter-Regular.ttf

133 ms

Inter-Regular.e89cb199.ttf

Inter-Regular.e89cb199.ttf

134 ms

Accessibility Review

agm.com accessibility score

88

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

High

Some elements have a [tabindex] value greater than 0

Best Practices

agm.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

agm.com SEO score

85

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Agm.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Agm.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

agm.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Agm. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: