5.2 sec in total
972 ms
3.6 sec
643 ms
Visit agropit.ru now to see the best up-to-date Agropit content for Russia and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about agropit.ru
Научно-производственный центр «Агропищепром». Разработка нормативно-технической документации. ТУ на продукты питания, ТИ к ГОСТ, ТТК, СТО, ХАССП, ППК. Только положительные отзывы! Технология СУ-ВИД.
Visit agropit.ruWe analyzed Agropit.ru page load time and found that the first response time was 972 ms and then it took 4.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
agropit.ru performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value7.2 s
1/100
10%
Value7.2 s
5/100
25%
Value12.0 s
4/100
10%
Value10,050 ms
0/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value21.5 s
1/100
10%
972 ms
272 ms
268 ms
277 ms
28 ms
Our browser made a total of 116 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 60% of them (70 requests) were addressed to the original Agropit.ru, 16% (19 requests) were made to Kiora.s3-eu-west-1.amazonaws.com and 4% (5 requests) were made to Allfont.ru. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Agropit.ru.
Page size can be reduced by 850.3 kB (29%)
3.0 MB
2.1 MB
In fact, the total size of Agropit.ru main page is 3.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 78.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 78.0 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 253.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Agropit needs image optimization as it can save up to 253.8 kB or 12% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 362.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 362.6 kB or 62% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 155.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Agropit.ru needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 155.8 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 43 (39%)
110
67
The browser has sent 110 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Agropit. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 22 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 18 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
agropit.ru
972 ms
style.css
272 ms
styles.css
268 ms
layerslider.css
277 ms
css
28 ms
style.css
279 ms
jquery.fancybox-1.3.7.min.css
278 ms
css
39 ms
css
49 ms
tooltipster.css
394 ms
tooltipster-light.css
399 ms
slimbox2.css
403 ms
jquery.js
547 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
419 ms
greensock.js
552 ms
layerslider.kreaturamedia.jquery.js
666 ms
layerslider.transitions.js
533 ms
mootools.js
670 ms
ki.Cookies.js
554 ms
ki.JSCart.js
667 ms
jquery.tooltipster.min.js
684 ms
slimbox2.js
687 ms
conversion.js
17 ms
top100.jcn
368 ms
jquery.form.min.js
437 ms
scripts.js
547 ms
wp-embed.min.js
545 ms
jquery.fancybox-1.3.7.min.js
548 ms
jquery.mousewheel.min.js
562 ms
font-awesome.css
560 ms
dc_columns.css
565 ms
style-new-design.css
672 ms
189 ms
192 ms
bangkok.css
95 ms
junegull-regular.css
96 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
221 ms
easy-table.css
135 ms
bg001.jpg
618 ms
logo-main-100.png
294 ms
79.jpg
322 ms
76.jpg
294 ms
98.jpg
300 ms
96.jpg
301 ms
82.jpg
328 ms
117.jpg
432 ms
86.jpg
418 ms
74.jpg
567 ms
80.jpg
578 ms
83.jpg
466 ms
75.jpg
469 ms
116.jpg
563 ms
85.jpg
708 ms
84.jpg
605 ms
73.jpg
609 ms
77.jpg
863 ms
81.jpg
707 ms
78.jpg
717 ms
129.jpg
747 ms
127.jpg
750 ms
132.jpg
864 ms
136.jpg
864 ms
131.jpg
998 ms
67.jpg
887 ms
68.jpg
892 ms
122.jpg
997 ms
121.jpg
996 ms
72.jpg
1125 ms
87.jpg
1026 ms
71.jpg
1033 ms
64.jpg
1110 ms
65.jpg
1264 ms
70.jpg
1134 ms
slide01.jpg
438 ms
slide03.jpg
367 ms
slide04.jpg
390 ms
slide05.jpg
350 ms
slide06.jpg
438 ms
slide07.jpg
702 ms
Ukaz1.png
727 ms
008.jpg
502 ms
009.jpg
543 ms
010.jpg
538 ms
1-142x200.jpg
610 ms
statia-c-N.g.-144x200.jpg
633 ms
pozdrav2016-200x141.png
728 ms
images1_27-200x133.jpg
696 ms
on-line-mail2.png
707 ms
on-line-phone4.png
805 ms
69.jpg
1155 ms
bangkok_2505381306764a2feb773d9165a88bd6.woff
271 ms
66.jpg
1157 ms
smal-map.png
824 ms
envelope2.jpg
762 ms
233 ms
ga.js
208 ms
top100.scn
227 ms
code.js
423 ms
watch.js
299 ms
skin.css
544 ms
__utm.gif
23 ms
118.jpg
961 ms
3179961255.png
980 ms
38 ms
bg-footer-01.png
975 ms
ajax-loader.gif
1003 ms
watch.js
469 ms
counter2
156 ms
counter
231 ms
advert.gif
143 ms
skin.png
136 ms
blank.gif
315 ms
shadow.png
263 ms
loading.gif
265 ms
1
93 ms
tracker
141 ms
agropit.ru accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
agropit.ru best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
agropit.ru SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
RU
RU
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Agropit.ru can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Agropit.ru main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
agropit.ru
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Agropit. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: