Tools & Wizards About Us
agropro.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 19

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    36% of other websites

  • 81

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 51% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 98

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    92% of websites

agropro.net

Agropro Lawn Care Specialists | Woodstock GA | AgroPro

Page Load Speed

1.5 sec in total

First Response

168 ms

Resources Loaded

729 ms

Page Rendered

624 ms

agropro.net screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Agropro content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about agropro.net

Agropro offers premium lawn care and plant health care services designed specifically for your property. Contact us today at 678-445-9990.

Visit agropro.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Agropro.net page load time and found that the first response time was 168 ms and then it took 1.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

agropro.net performance score

19

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.3 s

18/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value11.8 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.6 s

26/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value3,720 ms

1/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.088

92/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value19.8 s

2/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

agropro.net

168 ms

js

92 ms

css-7ca9e-93497.css

29 ms

css-c3099-90516.css

20 ms

css-7a08a-61922.css

23 ms

Our browser made a total of 44 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 55% of them (24 requests) were addressed to the original Agropro.net, 30% (13 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 5% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (191 ms) relates to the external source Fw-cdn.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 134.1 kB (16%)

Content Size

847.2 kB

After Optimization

713.1 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Agropro.net main page is 847.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 380.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 122.9 kB

  • Original 144.3 kB
  • After minification 141.4 kB
  • After compression 21.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 122.9 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 8.0 kB

  • Original 257.3 kB
  • After minification 249.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Agropro images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 1.4 kB

  • Original 380.6 kB
  • After minification 380.6 kB
  • After compression 379.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 1.8 kB

  • Original 65.0 kB
  • After minification 65.0 kB
  • After compression 63.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Agropro.net has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 24 (83%)

Requests Now

29

After Optimization

5

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 29 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Agropro. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

agropro.net

agropro.net

168 ms

js

js

92 ms

css-7ca9e-93497.css

css-7ca9e-93497.css

29 ms

css-c3099-90516.css

css-c3099-90516.css

20 ms

css-7a08a-61922.css

css-7a08a-61922.css

23 ms

css-db553-91574.css

css-db553-91574.css

19 ms

js-03444-90516.js

js-03444-90516.js

20 ms

jcemediabox.min.js

jcemediabox.min.js

39 ms

js-0544e-61922.js

js-0544e-61922.js

41 ms

api.js

api.js

62 ms

js

js

87 ms

3599416.js

3599416.js

191 ms

smartslider.min.css

smartslider.min.css

38 ms

css

css

113 ms

fontawesome.min.css

fontawesome.min.css

38 ms

linearicons.min.css

linearicons.min.css

44 ms

materialicons.min.css

materialicons.min.css

44 ms

n2.min.js

n2.min.js

45 ms

smartslider-frontend.min.js

smartslider-frontend.min.js

52 ms

ss-simple.min.js

ss-simple.min.js

43 ms

ss-block.min.js

ss-block.min.js

43 ms

w-arrow-image.min.js

w-arrow-image.min.js

46 ms

w-bullet.min.js

w-bullet.min.js

45 ms

system.css

system.css

30 ms

css2

css2

45 ms

font-awesome-base.css

font-awesome-base.css

26 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

38 ms

logo.png

logo.png

116 ms

Home-slider-golden.jpeg

Home-slider-golden.jpeg

33 ms

insta.png

insta.png

10 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

12 ms

1Pt_g8LJRfWJmhDAuUsSQamb1W0lwk4S4bbLPrQ.ttf

1Pt_g8LJRfWJmhDAuUsSQamb1W0lwk4S4bbLPrQ.ttf

34 ms

1Pt_g8LJRfWJmhDAuUsSQamb1W0lwk4S4Y_LPrQ.ttf

1Pt_g8LJRfWJmhDAuUsSQamb1W0lwk4S4Y_LPrQ.ttf

57 ms

1Pt_g8LJRfWJmhDAuUsSQamb1W0lwk4S4VrMPrQ.ttf

1Pt_g8LJRfWJmhDAuUsSQamb1W0lwk4S4VrMPrQ.ttf

71 ms

1Pt_g8LJRfWJmhDAuUsSQamb1W0lwk4S4WjMDrMfJQ.ttf

1Pt_g8LJRfWJmhDAuUsSQamb1W0lwk4S4WjMDrMfJQ.ttf

73 ms

1Pt_g8LJRfWJmhDAuUsSQamb1W0lwk4S4WjMPrQ.ttf

1Pt_g8LJRfWJmhDAuUsSQamb1W0lwk4S4WjMPrQ.ttf

72 ms

1Pt_g8LJRfWJmhDAuUsSQamb1W0lwk4S4TbMDrMfJQ.ttf

1Pt_g8LJRfWJmhDAuUsSQamb1W0lwk4S4TbMDrMfJQ.ttf

72 ms

1Pt_g8LJRfWJmhDAuUsSQamb1W0lwk4S4TbMPrQ.ttf

1Pt_g8LJRfWJmhDAuUsSQamb1W0lwk4S4TbMPrQ.ttf

74 ms

ga6iaw1J5X9T9RW6j9bNVls-hfgvz8JcMofYTa32J4wsL2JAlAhZqFCTx8cP.ttf

ga6iaw1J5X9T9RW6j9bNVls-hfgvz8JcMofYTa32J4wsL2JAlAhZqFCTx8cP.ttf

72 ms

ga6iaw1J5X9T9RW6j9bNVls-hfgvz8JcMofYTa32J4wsL2JAlAhZ9lCTx8cP.ttf

ga6iaw1J5X9T9RW6j9bNVls-hfgvz8JcMofYTa32J4wsL2JAlAhZ9lCTx8cP.ttf

113 ms

o-0mIpQlx3QUlC5A4PNB6Ryti20_6n1iPHjcz6L1SoM-jCpoiyD9A-9a6Vc.ttf

o-0mIpQlx3QUlC5A4PNB6Ryti20_6n1iPHjcz6L1SoM-jCpoiyD9A-9a6Vc.ttf

73 ms

o-0mIpQlx3QUlC5A4PNB6Ryti20_6n1iPHjcz6L1SoM-jCpoiyCjA-9a6Vc.ttf

o-0mIpQlx3QUlC5A4PNB6Ryti20_6n1iPHjcz6L1SoM-jCpoiyCjA-9a6Vc.ttf

73 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

74 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf

74 ms

Accessibility Review

agropro.net accessibility score

81

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

agropro.net best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

agropro.net SEO score

98

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Agropro.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Agropro.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

agropro.net

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Agropro. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: