Report Summary

  • 31

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    51% of other websites

  • 85

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 58% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 99

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    93% of websites

airduct.cleaning

Sani-Clean - Michigan's Top-Rated Air Duct Cleaning Specialists!

Page Load Speed

2.8 sec in total

First Response

200 ms

Resources Loaded

2.3 sec

Page Rendered

306 ms

airduct.cleaning screenshot

About Website

Welcome to airduct.cleaning homepage info - get ready to check Air Duct best content right away, or after learning these important things about airduct.cleaning

Macomb County's 5 Star Duct Cleaning company. We have been consistently rated 5 stars across every review platform since we opened in 2011. You can trust us to clean your hvac system properly.

Visit airduct.cleaning

Key Findings

We analyzed Airduct.cleaning page load time and found that the first response time was 200 ms and then it took 2.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

airduct.cleaning performance score

31

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.5 s

15/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.5 s

37/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.2 s

30/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,720 ms

10/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.078

95/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value17.9 s

4/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

airduct.cleaning

200 ms

airduct.cleaning

253 ms

www.airduct.cleaning

178 ms

www.airduct.cleaning

320 ms

bootstrap.min.css

38 ms

Our browser made a total of 73 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 75% of them (55 requests) were addressed to the original Airduct.cleaning, 7% (5 requests) were made to Youtube.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Maxcdn.bootstrapcdn.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (860 ms) belongs to the original domain Airduct.cleaning.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 73.3 kB (1%)

Content Size

6.9 MB

After Optimization

6.8 MB

In fact, the total size of Airduct.cleaning main page is 6.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 6.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 25.8 kB

  • Original 31.6 kB
  • After minification 24.7 kB
  • After compression 5.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 6.9 kB, which is 22% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 25.8 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 11.8 kB

  • Original 6.4 MB
  • After minification 6.4 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Air Duct images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-8%

Potential reduce by 34.2 kB

  • Original 423.0 kB
  • After minification 422.8 kB
  • After compression 388.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 1.4 kB

  • Original 65.9 kB
  • After minification 65.9 kB
  • After compression 64.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Airduct.cleaning has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 19 (28%)

Requests Now

68

After Optimization

49

The browser has sent 68 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Air Duct. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

airduct.cleaning accessibility score

85

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA input fields do not have accessible names

High

Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

airduct.cleaning best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

airduct.cleaning SEO score

99

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Airduct.cleaning can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Airduct.cleaning main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Air Duct. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: