4.1 sec in total
1.3 sec
2.6 sec
251 ms
Welcome to airportail.net homepage info - get ready to check Air Portail best content right away, or after learning these important things about airportail.net
Le blog des destinations aériennes
Visit airportail.netWe analyzed Airportail.net page load time and found that the first response time was 1.3 sec and then it took 2.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
airportail.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.4 s
7/100
10%
Value8.3 s
2/100
25%
Value7.3 s
28/100
10%
Value100 ms
98/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value7.4 s
49/100
10%
1255 ms
21 ms
284 ms
433 ms
504 ms
Our browser made a total of 32 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 88% of them (28 requests) were addressed to the original Airportail.net, 6% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Airportail.net.
Page size can be reduced by 541.1 kB (38%)
1.4 MB
867.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Airportail.net main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 702.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 47.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 47.2 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 13.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Air Portail images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 199.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 199.1 kB or 64% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 281.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Airportail.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 281.2 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 10 (38%)
26
16
The browser has sent 26 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Air Portail. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
airportail.net
1255 ms
css
21 ms
fontawesome-all.min.css
284 ms
style.min.css
433 ms
style.min.css
504 ms
style-modular-scale.min.css
212 ms
jquery.min.js
363 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
215 ms
modernizr.min.js
402 ms
tc-scripts.min.js
544 ms
core.min.js
290 ms
miami_beach.jpg
398 ms
shanghai_pudong_by_night.jpg
525 ms
las-vegas-paris-sunset.jpg
600 ms
la-grande-muraille-chine.jpg
449 ms
philadelphia.jpg
525 ms
tananative.jpg
549 ms
Carte_antilles_1843-570x350.jpg
602 ms
alcazaba-malaga.jpg
600 ms
jerez.jpg
605 ms
littlerock_arkansas.jpg
628 ms
remparts-de-dubrovnik.jpg
749 ms
charlotte.png
826 ms
ga.js
8 ms
6xK3dSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3qOK7g.ttf
24 ms
customizr.woff
86 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
166 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
87 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
157 ms
__utm.gif
64 ms
magnific-popup.min.css
89 ms
jquery-magnific-popup.min.js
85 ms
airportail.net accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
airportail.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
airportail.net SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
FR
FR
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Airportail.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that French is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Airportail.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
airportail.net
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Air Portail. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: