Tools & Wizards About Us
airreview.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 45

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    64% of other websites

  • 84

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 56% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    20% of websites

  • 81

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    42% of websites

airreview.com

AirReview - Airline Reviews, opinions & pictures of airlines seats, meals, IFE and lounges

Page Load Speed

2.1 sec in total

First Response

248 ms

Resources Loaded

1.7 sec

Page Rendered

147 ms

airreview.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to airreview.com homepage info - get ready to check Air Review best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about airreview.com

Airline Reviews from Airreview with pictures showing inflight service, seats, fleet, meals, entertainment, routes, baggage allowance & lounges at airreview.com

Visit airreview.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Airreview.com page load time and found that the first response time was 248 ms and then it took 1.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

airreview.com performance score

45

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.8 s

57/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.0 s

50/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.3 s

75/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,440 ms

15/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.076

95/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value13.8 s

10/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

airreview.com

248 ms

adsbygoogle.js

111 ms

anylinkmenu.css

150 ms

Airreview.js

181 ms

show_ads_impl.js

355 ms

Our browser made a total of 61 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 25% of them (15 requests) were addressed to the original Airreview.com, 11% (7 requests) were made to Googleads.g.doubleclick.net and 10% (6 requests) were made to Apis.google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (864 ms) relates to the external source Googleads.g.doubleclick.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 261.9 kB (21%)

Content Size

1.2 MB

After Optimization

986.9 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Airreview.com main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 717.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 91.6 kB

  • Original 109.6 kB
  • After minification 85.0 kB
  • After compression 18.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 24.6 kB, which is 22% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 91.6 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 5.9 kB

  • Original 421.0 kB
  • After minification 415.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Air Review images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-23%

Potential reduce by 164.1 kB

  • Original 717.6 kB
  • After minification 717.6 kB
  • After compression 553.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 164.1 kB or 23% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-42%

Potential reduce by 272 B

  • Original 649 B
  • After minification 649 B
  • After compression 377 B

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Airreview.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 272 B or 42% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 21 (38%)

Requests Now

55

After Optimization

34

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 55 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Air Review. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 22 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

airreview.com

airreview.com

248 ms

adsbygoogle.js

adsbygoogle.js

111 ms

anylinkmenu.css

anylinkmenu.css

150 ms

Airreview.js

Airreview.js

181 ms

show_ads_impl.js

show_ads_impl.js

355 ms

Lux-Traveller-Logo.gif

Lux-Traveller-Logo.gif

400 ms

Banner.gif

Banner.gif

148 ms

NZ1.gif

NZ1.gif

149 ms

o.gif

o.gif

147 ms

SQA380.gif

SQA380.gif

193 ms

BA1.gif

BA1.gif

194 ms

Cathay-HKG-Lounge-Wing1.jpg

Cathay-HKG-Lounge-Wing1.jpg

148 ms

QF1.gif

QF1.gif

148 ms

AdvertIcon.gif

AdvertIcon.gif

194 ms

united-CRJ550-first-class.jpg

united-CRJ550-first-class.jpg

576 ms

delta-a330-business-class-seat.jpg

delta-a330-business-class-seat.jpg

634 ms

brussels-airlines-business-class-shorthaul.jpg

brussels-airlines-business-class-shorthaul.jpg

630 ms

qantas-a380-best-seats.jpg

qantas-a380-best-seats.jpg

577 ms

Stars.gif

Stars.gif

73 ms

PlaneRack.gif

PlaneRack.gif

252 ms

show_ads.js

show_ads.js

68 ms

zrt_lookup.html

zrt_lookup.html

28 ms

ads

ads

182 ms

ads

ads

693 ms

RightOthersNoTop.htm

RightOthersNoTop.htm

248 ms

ads

ads

864 ms

ads

ads

653 ms

ga_social_tracking.js

ga_social_tracking.js

26 ms

plusone.js

plusone.js

32 ms

all.js

all.js

12 ms

all.js

all.js

16 ms

widgets.js

widgets.js

92 ms

cb=gapi.loaded_0

cb=gapi.loaded_0

7 ms

cb=gapi.loaded_1

cb=gapi.loaded_1

60 ms

fastbutton

fastbutton

59 ms

Latestcomments.php

Latestcomments.php

648 ms

Arrow.gif

Arrow.gif

72 ms

postmessageRelay

postmessageRelay

81 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

12 ms

widget_iframe.2f70fb173b9000da126c79afe2098f02.html

widget_iframe.2f70fb173b9000da126c79afe2098f02.html

187 ms

like.php

like.php

169 ms

collect

collect

29 ms

developers.google.com

developers.google.com

579 ms

js

js

62 ms

3604799710-postmessagerelay.js

3604799710-postmessagerelay.js

21 ms

rpc:shindig_random.js

rpc:shindig_random.js

11 ms

cb=gapi.loaded_0

cb=gapi.loaded_0

5 ms

LdI20IMSy2-.js

LdI20IMSy2-.js

32 ms

FEppCFCt76d.png

FEppCFCt76d.png

24 ms

settings

settings

99 ms

button.856debeac157d9669cf51e73a08fbc93.js

button.856debeac157d9669cf51e73a08fbc93.js

22 ms

embeds

embeds

34 ms

tweet_button.2f70fb173b9000da126c79afe2098f02.en.html

tweet_button.2f70fb173b9000da126c79afe2098f02.en.html

31 ms

12597465948925579116

12597465948925579116

149 ms

abg_lite.js

abg_lite.js

23 ms

s

s

5 ms

window_focus.js

window_focus.js

23 ms

qs_click_protection.js

qs_click_protection.js

28 ms

ufs_web_display.js

ufs_web_display.js

17 ms

one_click_handler_one_afma.js

one_click_handler_one_afma.js

147 ms

icon.png

icon.png

13 ms

Accessibility Review

airreview.com accessibility score

84

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

airreview.com best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

airreview.com SEO score

81

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Airreview.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Airreview.com main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

airreview.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Air Review. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: