Tools & Wizards About Us
ajfengineering.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 19

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    36% of other websites

  • 78

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 45% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

ajfengineering.com

Home Inspector in Phoenix, AZ - Certified Professionals | AJF Inspections

Page Load Speed

3.2 sec in total

First Response

76 ms

Resources Loaded

1.5 sec

Page Rendered

1.6 sec

ajfengineering.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to ajfengineering.com homepage info - get ready to check AJF Engineering best content right away, or after learning these important things about ajfengineering.com

Arizona Best Home Inspection Company. Provide Professional Home Inspection Services in Phoenix, Scottsdale, Gilbert & Nearby Since 1996. Call (480) 661-8888 Today!

Visit ajfengineering.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Ajfengineering.com page load time and found that the first response time was 76 ms and then it took 3.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

ajfengineering.com performance score

19

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.6 s

31/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.2 s

2/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value13.1 s

2/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value8,020 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value26.2 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

ajfengineering.com

76 ms

ajfinspections.com

187 ms

wprev-public_combine.css

33 ms

style.min.css

46 ms

theme.min.css

53 ms

Our browser made a total of 89 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Ajfengineering.com, 84% (75 requests) were made to Ajfinspections.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (771 ms) relates to the external source Ma.zoho.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 542.9 kB (22%)

Content Size

2.5 MB

After Optimization

2.0 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Ajfengineering.com main page is 2.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 452.2 kB

  • Original 562.7 kB
  • After minification 549.3 kB
  • After compression 110.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 452.2 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 1.2 MB
  • After minification 1.2 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. AJF Engineering images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 10.3 kB

  • Original 570.6 kB
  • After minification 570.6 kB
  • After compression 560.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-42%

Potential reduce by 80.3 kB

  • Original 192.4 kB
  • After minification 191.9 kB
  • After compression 112.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ajfengineering.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 80.3 kB or 42% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 80 (95%)

Requests Now

84

After Optimization

4

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 84 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of AJF Engineering. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 38 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 44 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

ajfengineering.com

ajfengineering.com

76 ms

ajfinspections.com

ajfinspections.com

187 ms

wprev-public_combine.css

wprev-public_combine.css

33 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

46 ms

theme.min.css

theme.min.css

53 ms

header-footer.min.css

header-footer.min.css

52 ms

frontend.min.css

frontend.min.css

47 ms

post-9.css

post-9.css

45 ms

widget-image.min.css

widget-image.min.css

50 ms

widget-nav-menu.min.css

widget-nav-menu.min.css

77 ms

widget-icon-list.min.css

widget-icon-list.min.css

74 ms

widget-heading.min.css

widget-heading.min.css

77 ms

widget-social-icons.min.css

widget-social-icons.min.css

80 ms

apple-webkit.min.css

apple-webkit.min.css

79 ms

swiper.min.css

swiper.min.css

78 ms

e-swiper.min.css

e-swiper.min.css

90 ms

popup.min.css

popup.min.css

92 ms

widget-text-editor.min.css

widget-text-editor.min.css

92 ms

widget-form.min.css

widget-form.min.css

92 ms

widget-video.min.css

widget-video.min.css

86 ms

widget-loop-builder.min.css

widget-loop-builder.min.css

88 ms

post-430.css

post-430.css

97 ms

post-82.css

post-82.css

100 ms

post-60.css

post-60.css

101 ms

style.css

style.css

103 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

104 ms

jquery.powertip.min.css

jquery.powertip.min.css

105 ms

magnific-popup.css

magnific-popup.css

107 ms

animate.min.css

animate.min.css

108 ms

jquery.bxslider.min.css

jquery.bxslider.min.css

115 ms

core.min.css

core.min.css

127 ms

breeze-prefetch-links.min.js

breeze-prefetch-links.min.js

119 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

113 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

110 ms

js

js

126 ms

jquery.magnific-popup.min.js

jquery.magnific-popup.min.js

114 ms

jquery.powertip.min.js

jquery.powertip.min.js

123 ms

jquery.scrollTo.min.js

jquery.scrollTo.min.js

122 ms

127692.js

127692.js

74 ms

122465.js

122465.js

75 ms

44707138.js

44707138.js

102 ms

api.js

api.js

76 ms

post-5774.css

post-5774.css

109 ms

post-2623.css

post-2623.css

138 ms

post-688.css

post-688.css

125 ms

widget-nested-carousel.min.css

widget-nested-carousel.min.css

155 ms

post-564.css

post-564.css

153 ms

post-2271.css

post-2271.css

153 ms

post-3147.css

post-3147.css

152 ms

widget-star-rating.min.css

widget-star-rating.min.css

152 ms

post-1968.css

post-1968.css

130 ms

post-2077.css

post-2077.css

129 ms

post-1946.css

post-1946.css

128 ms

widget-hotspot.min.css

widget-hotspot.min.css

127 ms

post-1960.css

post-1960.css

128 ms

post-57.css

post-57.css

128 ms

sticky.min.css

sticky.min.css

120 ms

jquery.bxslider.min.js

jquery.bxslider.min.js

118 ms

lazysizes.min.js

lazysizes.min.js

232 ms

wprev-public-com-min.js

wprev-public-com-min.js

231 ms

hello-frontend.min.js

hello-frontend.min.js

230 ms

jquery.smartmenus.min.js

jquery.smartmenus.min.js

230 ms

jquery.sticky.min.js

jquery.sticky.min.js

223 ms

imagesloaded.min.js

imagesloaded.min.js

222 ms

masonry.min.js

masonry.min.js

221 ms

jquery.masonry.min.js

jquery.masonry.min.js

223 ms

plugin.js

plugin.js

220 ms

webpack-pro.runtime.min.js

webpack-pro.runtime.min.js

219 ms

webpack.runtime.min.js

webpack.runtime.min.js

218 ms

frontend-modules.min.js

frontend-modules.min.js

216 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

214 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

214 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

213 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

212 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

208 ms

elements-handlers.min.js

elements-handlers.min.js

203 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

212 ms

Phoenix-Arizona-4-min.png

Phoenix-Arizona-4-min.png

105 ms

circle.svg

circle.svg

101 ms

OpenSans-SemiBold-1.woff

OpenSans-SemiBold-1.woff

95 ms

OpenSans-Bold-1.woff

OpenSans-Bold-1.woff

94 ms

OpenSans-Regular-1.woff

OpenSans-Regular-1.woff

95 ms

app.js

app.js

610 ms

WebsiteAutomation.js

WebsiteAutomation.js

771 ms

banner.js

banner.js

112 ms

collectedforms.js

collectedforms.js

111 ms

web-interactives-embed.js

web-interactives-embed.js

112 ms

44707138.js

44707138.js

124 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

55 ms

Accessibility Review

ajfengineering.com accessibility score

78

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

High

[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents

High

ARIA IDs are not unique

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

ajfengineering.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

ajfengineering.com SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ajfengineering.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ajfengineering.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

ajfengineering.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of AJF Engineering. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: