4.2 sec in total
719 ms
1.9 sec
1.5 sec
Visit aldercarp.com now to see the best up-to-date Aldercarp content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about aldercarp.com
Visit aldercarp.comWe analyzed Aldercarp.com page load time and found that the first response time was 719 ms and then it took 3.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
aldercarp.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.3 s
17/100
10%
Value5.4 s
21/100
25%
Value8.2 s
20/100
10%
Value110 ms
98/100
30%
Value0.001
100/100
15%
Value5.7 s
67/100
10%
719 ms
24 ms
295 ms
225 ms
255 ms
Our browser made a total of 75 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 97% of them (73 requests) were addressed to the original Aldercarp.com, 1% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Maps.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (992 ms) belongs to the original domain Aldercarp.com.
Page size can be reduced by 901.3 kB (16%)
5.7 MB
4.8 MB
In fact, the total size of Aldercarp.com main page is 5.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 5.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 28.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 28.4 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 340.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Aldercarp images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 306.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 306.0 kB or 72% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 226.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Aldercarp.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 226.8 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 59 (81%)
73
14
The browser has sent 73 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Aldercarp. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 47 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 14 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
aldercarp.com
719 ms
css
24 ms
bootstrap.min.css
295 ms
bootstrap-theme.min.css
225 ms
font-awesome.min.css
255 ms
animate.min.css
261 ms
prettyphoto.css
256 ms
flexslider.css
191 ms
style.css
308 ms
responsive.css
285 ms
ie.css
303 ms
common.css
318 ms
skin.css
329 ms
custom.css
318 ms
style.css
326 ms
jquery.js
467 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
365 ms
selectivizr-min.js
372 ms
json2.min.js
366 ms
js
38 ms
respond.min.js
368 ms
boot.js
45 ms
jquery.mobile.custom.min.js
74 ms
jquery.pixelentity.lazyload.js
70 ms
jquery.theme.utils.js
77 ms
jquery.mousewheel.js
78 ms
jquery.pixelentity.utils.browser.js
80 ms
jquery.pixelentity.utils.geom.js
122 ms
jquery.pixelentity.utils.preloader.js
122 ms
jquery.pixelentity.utils.transition.js
120 ms
jquery.pixelentity.transform.js
113 ms
jquery.pixelentity.utils.youtube.js
121 ms
froogaloop.js
239 ms
jquery.pixelentity.utils.vimeo.js
240 ms
jquery.pixelentity.video.js
240 ms
jquery.pixelentity.videoPlayer.js
221 ms
jquery.pixelentity.utils.ticker.js
220 ms
jquery.pixelentity.backgroundSlider.js
221 ms
jquery.pixelentity.flare.lightbox.js
224 ms
jquery.pixelentity.simplethumb.js
221 ms
jquery.pixelentity.flare.lightbox.render.gallery.js
222 ms
jquery.pixelentity.flare.lightbox.render.image.js
221 ms
bootstrap.min.js
234 ms
waypoints.min.js
222 ms
jquery.easing.js
223 ms
jquery.prettyphoto.js
243 ms
smoothscroll.js
224 ms
jquery.backstretch.min.js
241 ms
jquery.flexslider.min.js
241 ms
jquery.isotope.min.js
250 ms
jquery.waitforimages.js
328 ms
jquery.appear.js
328 ms
jquery.pixelentity.contactForm.js
324 ms
jquery.pixelentity.widgets.js
321 ms
jquery.pixelentity.widgets.contact.js
317 ms
jquery.fitvids.js
316 ms
jquery.easypiechart.js
326 ms
jquery.mb.YTPlayer.js
339 ms
nervaq.js
312 ms
custom.js
307 ms
pixelentity.controller.js
326 ms
init.js
313 ms
loading-animation.gif
300 ms
logoencurvas1.png
356 ms
logofinal.png
303 ms
background-title.png
300 ms
2013-02-22-01591-440x310.jpg
310 ms
20120523_004-440x310.jpg
252 ms
1.jpg
992 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
310 ms
51.jpg
530 ms
81.jpg
571 ms
7.jpg
576 ms
6.jpg
572 ms
2.jpg
743 ms
aldercarp.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Document doesn't have a <title> element
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
aldercarp.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
aldercarp.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Document doesn't have a <title> element
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
ES
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Aldercarp.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Spanish is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed English language. Our system also found out that Aldercarp.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
aldercarp.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Aldercarp. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: